this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2026
387 points (93.5% liked)

Technology

81162 readers
4113 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In a blog post, Musk said the acquisition was warranted because global electricity demand for AI cannot be met with “terrestrial solutions,” and Silicon Valley will soon need to build data centers in space to power its AI ambitions.

This dumb fuck. Unfortunately, his boosters will be all-in on this messaging. Whatever.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dancroissant@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

It's all a scam that would be investigated in normal times. Tesla's cars and robots will need AI to function (albeit xAI seems to be failing spectacularly), and xAI is hemorrhaging cash, but he loses leverage over Tesla's board if the AI division went to the Tesla. SpaceX investors should be pissed they're going to be carrying it now, and Tesla investors should be pissed as well.

[–] AshMan85@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Arrest this pedo

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 7 points 1 week ago (12 children)

A million satellites he says. That's 100 satellites per starship launch. 5 times per day, every day, for five years. By the time you're done, the first ones are burned out and you have to do it all again. And that's assuming one GPU per satellite because solar panels even in space can't pull enough power to feed multiple of those hungry things.

load more comments (12 replies)

I guess this is insurance for when the bubble pops. It helps justify the "too big to fail"

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 5 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Doesn't one of those companies rely on government contracts? And now that company generates CSAM on demand?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Herr_S_aus_H@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

How little of an understanding of how the natural world works do you need to have to think that data centers in space are a good idea? Nothing to say of economics and logistics. Or am I missing something big here?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago

Uh oh, vibe-engineered rockets.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 5 points 1 week ago

But that was the one place that hadn't been corrupted by capitalism!

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

And it will all come crashing down

“Valuable”

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago
[–] FancyPantsFIRE@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Now if he rolls these into Tesla he’ll be on his way to ticking off one of the requirements to unlock his completely legitimate cagillion dollar pay package.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Rothe@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago

Data centers in space sounds like one hell of an expensive investment for something that has not once shown any profitability yet, and are in fact most likely about to burst its bubble in the near future.

[–] Alloi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

great place to store the expensive child porn generators. far away in space, where a molotov can never reach.

i fucking hate this timeline.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

Or...he just tanked the value of both.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›