this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
41 points (90.2% liked)

politics

25117 readers
2148 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Santos Lopez uprooted his family and walked nearly 2,000 miles on a dangerous trek from Honduras to the United States last spring to escape from a violent gang that was extorting him. The group demanded a monthly payment, he said, to allow him to run his car shop in peace.

Like many others, Mr. Lopez and his family hoped their experience would persuade their adopted country to give them asylum, which is granted to those who face a “credible fear of persecution in their country of origin.” A grant of asylum would allow them to work and eventually apply for a green card and citizenship.

But more than a year after his family — including his wife and two daughters — arrived safely at the southern border, it seems likely they missed the deadline to apply. Mr. Lopez, 42, said he was seeking help from a lawyer.

Mr. Lopez and his family are among the millions of migrants who have arrived at the southern border in the past year. Many, after telling border agents about abuse and persecution that they experienced, a first step in the long and complicated process of seeking asylum, have been temporarily released as they wait for their immigration cases to wind their way through courts.

But even as migrants have applied for asylum in record numbers, advocates and immigration attorneys say that without additional legal support, many — perhaps the majority — will miss their application deadline and fall into a more perilous category of immigrant: the undocumented.

“Our immigration system is broken,” said Henry Love, vice president for policy and advocacy at Win, which runs 14 family shelters and has a contract with New York City to house migrant families.

“You’re going to have so many people who won’t have the opportunity to apply for asylum simply because of the logistical complications of it,” he said, adding: “I have a Ph.D., and there’s no way I could do it.”

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Blamemeta@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There were 1.3 million application as of May this year. At this point, it would be better to fix the problems in Central America.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Fixing the problems in Central America sounds nice, but pretty much all prior experience with the United States trying to "spread democracy" in Latin America and elsewhere suggests that would go poorly, and with climate change getting worse all the time it's not like fixing those problems is going to get any easier.

What we can do in the medium term is to streamline the asylum process so it doesn't backlog to 1.3 million applicants awaiting a decision, and in the short term we need to allow these people who fled here to remain here while we sort out this paperwork mess our policies have created.

[–] Blamemeta@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

We can't take in 1.3 asylum applicants. We can't build fast enough to house them all, we can't handle the increased traffic, none of that is possible right now. And if you just let them in before they get judged, then they just disappear and never show up to the appointments. Remember Obama's missing children? That's exactly what was happening.

[–] ilovesatan@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Blamemeta@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Traffic, not just in cars, but also lines at government offices, schools, and whatnot. A school designed for 700 kids can't support 1400, for example.

[–] ilovesatan@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

So you think streamlining the asylum process is somehow going to double to US population overnight? You have to be trolling.

[–] Blamemeta@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

No, but its not going help. Its only going to hurt Americans

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

In a nation of over 330 million people with 16 million vacant homes, 1.3 million is supposed to be a problem? I don't buy it, the resources and money are there, we just lack the political will to put them into play.

then they just disappear and never show up to appointments

You should cite something about how often that sort of thing happens (and how often it happens because the courts reschedule a hearing date and then don't do a good job of relaying that information to the applicant because the contact information they have on file doesn't get updated), but either way I'd personally rather have them go missing in the United States instead of Mexico or another country, because they're a lot more likely to be ultimately found in a mass grave in the latter case.

If you're looking for some sort of common ground - I could probably endorse putting ankle monitors on asylum applicants or something similar to keep tabs on them because I do think they've got less of a right to privacy than a citizen, but slamming the door in their face and saying "good luck with those drug cartels" shouldn't be an option.

[–] curiousaur@lemmy.fmhy.ml 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

"The group demanded a monthly payment, he said, to allow him to run his car shop"

Uh, I think they came to the wrong place if that's what they were trying to get away from.

load more comments
view more: next ›