this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2026
464 points (96.6% liked)

politics

28244 readers
1599 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“How’s the Democratic Party’s ground game in Pennsylvania?” I asked a friend several weeks before the 2024 presidential election. He replied optimistically that there were far more door knockers this year than in 2022.

It turned out these door knockers were just urging a vote for the Democrats without putting forth a compelling agenda attached to candidate commitments on issues that mean something to people where they live, work, and raise their families. There was no Democratic Party “Compact for the American People.” Then-President Joe Biden visited Pennsylvania, which went Republican, many times, with his most memorable message being that he grew up in Scranton.

...

Their aversion to building their own momentum to answer the basic questions “Whose side are you on?” and “What does the Democratic Party stand for?” remains as pathetic as it was in 2022 and 2024.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 41 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Democrats: At least we’re not republicans.

Yeah that’s not enough

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Since trump got elected that seems to be all they have. Biden, like him or not, actually had some decent policy. Yes, yes…could have done a lot better, but it was more than “we’re not trump”.

But since trump won? They’ve caved on pretty much everything.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

It's all they ran on in 2024 and also during Budens admin.

And it wasn't good enough then either.

[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 31 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They are already winning, they have all the campagn contributions they need. Why would they do anything different.

Citizens United will be the death of the USA.

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

How do we overturn Citizens United

[–] lofuw@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] OshagHennessey@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Expand the Supreme Court. It's not even a radical idea. We have one SC justice for every superior court circuit. The number of circuits has grown, the number of justices hasn't, and there's no reason they can't or shouldn't, except that it'd dilute the donors' power.

[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

congress and the senate would have to make s new law snd the president would have to sign it.

[–] derg@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Citizens United isn't a law, it's a Supreme Court ruling which has its (flawed) logic based on the Constitution. A law won't cut it, because Citizens United would be used as precedent to strike it down as unconstitutional. We likely need a new Supreme Court ruling or constitutional amendment.

[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Well crap, if you are correct, then we really, truly are fukt.

There is no way we'll see a constitutional admendment, especially not one for the people and agaisnt big business. Not in my lifetime. Its fascism from here on out. Fuuucccckkkkkkk.

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

At this point, can we use force? Just asking.

[–] derg@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I’ve heard there’s ways states can resist it with their own legislatures but yeah, it’s pretty bad. This really is the one thing we need overturned though

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Maybe we form a micronation that's basically like the US government but socialist?

[–] OshagHennessey@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Not possible without claiming land. Claiming land that belongs to a sovereign nation is an act of war.

[–] ebolapie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The CIA would like to know your location

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Do you think I'm fedposting?

[–] ebolapie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I dunno, are you fedposting? 🤨

But nah that wasn't my implication. Just that starting a micronation that's "the United States but better" would certainly attract some attention.

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What about a micronation under a distinct name, flag and seal?

[–] ebolapie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It doesn't matter what you call it. You can't do the United States but better. It will make the United States look bad. You must fail. The imperial hegemony demands it.

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

Does anyone think I should study and read a bit more theory?

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The people it benefits would have to decide to not benefit from it anymore.

So not likely unless the alternative is even worse.

[–] OshagHennessey@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Since it's a Supreme Court ruling, it would take another SC ruling or a constitutional ammendment to override it.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It’s because they’re traitors

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's so fucking crazy to see liberal Dems get on their soapbox about how "you can't talk about dual loyalty, that's antisemitism" and then show up at an AIPAC conference in Israel Flag pajama pants with an open checkbook to the US Treasury

[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

What's worse is if you add it all up, it's not even a decent lotto jackpot. The US sold the last bit of soul for pennies.

[–] Pure_Psykosis@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

This motherfucker even looks evil.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 week ago

How many times does the Democratic Party leadership have to create new and inventive ways to steal defeat from the jaws of victory for it to form a clear composite picture of collaboration?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 13 points 2 weeks ago

It's long past time for the MAGA comedy act of Schmuck & Jeffries to get the hook, and get dragged off-stage. They are 50% of the reason that Trump is president again.

Imagine if we let Hitler off the hook, and then allowed him to take power again a few years later? These dipshits did that.

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

They'll still be wagging their finger and expressing concern while they're being beaten and hauled off to a private prison.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 10 points 1 week ago

The Democratic party is such a pussyfest (negative).

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

And they never will

[–] MrErr@piefed.world 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (7 children)

Need to have Schummer, Jeffries and Martin removed. All democratic senate Candidates in 2026 need to be primaried, for a realistic chance of changing the democratic party.

If we can't do that, we should sit the election out.

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

We need more progressives and less establishment bourgeois liberals. Seriously!

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

We could at least have them removed from their leadership positions. That could happen today if 10 dems would call for a internal vote on it. Evidently we dont have that many willing to do the right thing. I wonder why $$$$.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Yeah its all the Democrats fault

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I didn't say it was just the good cop's fault, the good cop by definition has a partner.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Both sides voted to fund ICE...

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The most upvoted garbage here is always blaming Democrats instead, ya know, the party ACTUALLY in charge let alone the ones covering up and grovelling to a fascist pedophile.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 4 points 1 week ago

It's always let's blame the ppl not good enough because they could do better not the ones being bad.

Its like a parent punishing the normal kid for a mistake but never the bad one cause its expected.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They're not "cowards" as much as they are doing the job that they are paid to do by their "donors".

Schumer has made a fortune! Pelosi's family is set for generations! And so on.

Politics are the third easiest way to become wealthy in the USA (easiest being inheritance, second easiest prosperity gospel preacher).

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 1 points 1 week ago

..which is cowardly

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 1 points 1 week ago

Stay* wealthy.

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

With a mortar launcher

[–] MadBits@europe.pub 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

People have to understand that Republicans and Democrats are the same thing, its the same serpent which bites its own tail. Its controlled opposition.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›