this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2026
249 points (99.6% liked)

Ask Lemmy

37739 readers
1241 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Just came up with my father again.
He blames me that mother forgot her phone's and Google password because I recommended against it being a word.
I mentioned encryption, "not necessary unless you're doing something illegal".
When mentioning lack of privacy with targeted advertisements, he said that he actually really likes them, because he bought a couple of things he wanted for years.

I don't really have good arguments.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 107 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

2 big things for me.

First is that everyone, and I mean absolutely everyone has something they want to hide. People assume "I'm not a violent person or a criminal" except yes you are, and you've done something. A great example is everyone in the US speeds, absolutely everyone. Does that mean you want every office to know every instance of you speeding if you get pulled over? So, yes everyone has something they'd rather not say.

Second is more of an example of you should be allowed to go places without everyone knowing. The example was about 5 years ago police used location data to find a person who broke into someone's home. Problem is that the location data they used returned one person who happened to be on that street around the same time. They were riding their bike down the street. To the police they had the person there, they had proof, it was good enough. Except it wasn't, and he obviously wasn't the person they were looking for. Location data put him there though, and sold him out. So maybe not the best thing for whoever to know exactly where you are at any given time.

As for encryption, ask him for his porn history. If he gets upset, just say "why it's not illegal"

but, I agree with the other person. If you're dad is like mine and countless others, you're not fighting against him but propaganda. If that's the case, you aren't going to win this. The only winning is turning off the source.

[–] Chronographs@lemmy.zip 32 points 2 weeks ago

I wouldn’t say everyone speeds as not everyone even drives. The biggest thing for me is that even if you don’t have something you’re ashamed of it could still be something you could be targeted for, like political views, disability or gender identity etc.

[–] Libb@piefed.social 54 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

If I was to answer that type of argument, I would consider those:

  • why do you close the door of the bathroom when you use it?
  • Can I watch you fuck?
  • Show me your last income declaration
  • Give me your credit card
  • Why do you wear clothing?
  • Why do you lock the door of the house?

but I tend to ignore people using the "I have nothing to hide" argument

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I just be direct.

The people making this argument have already built an implicit stage in their mind where they're talking about when authority is trying to investigate you for being "one of the bad ones."

They're not "counting" personal privacy in this context like modesty and personal private space.

I just say "Because when the long arc of history swings the other way like it has for thousands of years, do you want your scary, blue-haired antifa boogymen to have the power to investigate you and your personal life and habits?"

If it's a male conservative, you can have great success with "So if someone says they need to check your hard drive for every image and video you've ever looked at, you're fine with that? I know a guy who can immediately restore every file you've ever deleted."

Sometimes they turn white.

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 43 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (8 children)

I'm going to be real. I was part way through an explanation before I deleted it. What you are dealing with sounds like a situation where you simply won't win by using logic. To continue to labor under the presumption that a good and logical reasoning will have an effect is just going to stress you out and achieve nothing.

Google password because I recommended against it being a word.

IT nerds help me out here, but I've been under the impression that the best defense against brute force attacks is a very long password, and the idea of sprinkling in special characters or numbers is outdated. Something like "iwenttothestoreandboughtabirthdaycake" is a more secure password than "$6jds_*WghP6".

edit: Also the mantra to never write down any passwords is more of a workplace piece of advice. I personally think, and this would probably be helpful for older people, that writing down passwords in a notebook which is kept secure in their home is pretty safe. Short of a home invasion, that notebook is safe, and having it can encourage them to diversify their passwords on different accounts. So, if you are going to keep at the issue, taking an angle of using something they are more comfortable with like a paper notebook is going to be accepted more easily than trying to sell them on a password manager or something.

[–] Technus@lemmy.zip 23 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

It doesn't even have to be that long. 12-16 characters and it'll be infeasible to brute-force for the foreseeable future. But unless you're talking a high-value target like government, military, or executive suite at a company, no one bothers to brute-force anyway because there's easier ways to gain access.

The biggest issue with password security is reuse and sharing. The most secure password in the world doesn't mean a damn thing if you use the same email/password combination across a hundred different websites, because all it takes is for just one of them to suffer a leak and now your credentials are in a dump with millions of others that can be bought for a song and a dance.

This is why it's imperative to use 2FA for your most important accounts, because it can mean the difference between an attacker getting access and hitting an error page and trying the next poor fucker's credentials instead.

But also, no one wants to try to remember a hundred different unique passwords so it's also a good idea to use a password manager. Chrome and Firefox both have them built-in (note that Firefox stores passwords unencrypted on disk unless you set a master password!), but there's also services like OnePass or Bitwarden that have stronger guarantees.

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

While being aware that leaking passwords and reusing them is a major risk, I was just asking about the construction of the password as it relates to being attacked directly.

But also, no one wants to try to remember a hundred different unique passwords so it’s also a good idea to use a password manager.

Absolutely. I recommended the notebook approach only because I think people of a certain mindset would be more open to it than a password manager, even if it isn't as elegant of a solution. At the end of the day it still diversifies passwords. I'm vividly picturing my mom throwing a fit any time a doctor or other office wants her to fill out a form on a tablet instead of paper.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

As far as I know, the thing is that randomly chosen words will be more secure because there's simply too many words. However, sentences will be more predictable. And a single word will give quick access to someone with a sufficient wordlist.

Honestly, I don't remember what exactly my recommendation was, just that I recommended against something quite simple (common word), and that she shouldn't tell me or anyone else what it is.

Edit: but I am not a professional, so don't use me for advice.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] paks@feddit.uk 30 points 2 weeks ago

Everyone's got something to hide.

For example, I like to keep my credit card number secret from criminals.

[–] Tweet@feddit.uk 29 points 1 week ago

"arguing that you don't care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don't care about free speech because you have nothing to say." -Edward Snowden

[–] virtualras@lemmy.world 28 points 2 weeks ago (13 children)

Ask them to unlock their phone and give it to me. If they have nothing to hide from me, then they truly have nothing to hide from anyone since I probably dont hold power over them (nor do I care to).

If they say yes, I show them that im going through their photos, location history, browsing history, texts, emails, all the usual suspects for surveilance. If they're ok with all of that, then by God they truly have nothing to hide.

If they say no, I ask them why. Try to let them find the answer for themselves.

Most just refuse, which is a good reminder to them that everyone has some secrets to keep. Even if they're completely innocuous.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Jack_Burton@lemmy.ca 26 points 2 weeks ago

Surprised I didn't see this quote yet:

“Ultimately, arguing that you don't care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don't care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” ― Edward Snowden

[–] tyler@programming.dev 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Tell him to leave the bathroom door open anytime he’s taking a shit in public then.

[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 20 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Compare it to free speech. Saying you don't need privacy because you have nothing to hide is like saying you don't need free speech because you have nothing to say. Eventually, through no fault of your own, there will come a time when you have something worth saying or hiding, and you will regret having surrendered your right to do so.

Another way to put it is: I don't need privacy because my judgment and intentions are shady, but because the authorities' judgment and intentions are, or one day will be. Allowing the authorities to invade your privacy and suppress your speech diminishes your ability to hold them accountable.

[–] 18107@aussie.zone 19 points 2 weeks ago

"I need privacy not because my actions are questionable, but because your judgement and intentions are."

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Give me the man and I will give you the case against him is a saying that was popularized in the Soviet Union and in Poland in the period of the People's Republic of Poland, attributed to the Stalinist jurist Andrey Vyshinsky,[2][5]: 200 [6] or the Soviet secret police chief Lavrentiy Beria.[3][4] It refers to the miscarriage of justice in the form of the abuse of power by the jurists, who could find any defendant guilty of "something", if they so desired

You can find just about anyone guilty of something if you have access to everything they do/say

When mentioning lack of privacy with targeted advertisements, he said that he actually really likes them, because he bought a couple of things he wanted for years.

"It's ok that we're being spied, it lets people better take my money on stuff I wanted anyway"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

"We require privacy not to conceal our own wrong doing, but to protect against people who would abuse their authority to pry into our lives and do us harm by misrepresenting what they find."

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago

You don’t lock the doors of your house because you have something to hide, you lock it because you have valuable things you want to protect.

Your dad’s fear is not the government (whether or not it actually should be), but he should have a reasonable fear of criminals taking his money. Technology has made it easier than ever to be robbed but also created better locks than ever to fight the criminals.

[–] asg101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 week ago

"If you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of men, I will find something in them which will hang him."

Cardinal Richelieu

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 16 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

"Take your pants off then jackass."

It's a stupid comment, treat it with the contempt it deserves. Do they shut the door when they take a shit? whyyyyyy???. You close your blinds there at night? Why ya lockin' the phone there buddy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Lumelore@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Easiest way to explain privacy imo is simply just saying: "If you have nothing to hide, then why do you shut the door when you go to the bathroom?"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fliberdygibits@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

I posted the following somewhere else recently:

"nothing to hide"

Secrecy and privacy are two different things.

Secrecy is hiding something you don't want anyone to know because it's "Bad/illegal".

Privacy is acknowledging that it's none of ANYONE'S business where you put gas in your car, what route you drive home, what brand of underwear you buy, what kind of music you listen to, your eating habits, etc.....

The more you are ok with data being collected, the more data they will try to collect until finally your life isn't yours anymore.

You don't close the bathroom door because you're doing something illegal, you close the bathroom door because it's none of anyone's business and you aren't interested in being watched.

Our personal data is valuable and holds power over us. Unfortunately it's only been recent decades that this concept REALLY started to sink in and unfortunately big corporations figured it out a little quicker than we did

[–] baronofclubs@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

I'm reminded of a story I heard about a woman in South America (I don't remember the country.) Her best friend attended a protest one year. She makes a post on Facebook about supporting her best friend. A few years pass, and the government started becoming more and more authoritarian. Finally, she gets a visit from the police, asking about her ties to her best friend, and is threatened with arrest unless she can prove she's not tied to the protest as well.

I'm probably getting some details wrong, but it's a thought that stuck with me. She didn't have anything to hide at the time. But things change, and you can't always predict what you'll have wish you had kept private before.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 12 points 2 weeks ago

Privacy is important so that nefarious individuals don't steal your identity, and everything you worked hard for, in your lifetime.

If they have nothing to hide ask for all of the following; all passwords, to everything (internet, bank, shopping accounts, investments, etc.) Bank statements Tax returns Get a set of keys for their homes, cars, businesses, etc. Remind them that you will be allowed to come over at any hour of the day or night and look through every nook & cranny of their property. If someone really is an open book, let the snooping begin. And also remind them that you will share whatever information you feel like with anyone you choose to, publicly.

Privacy prevents people from being abused, stalked and taken advantage of. Privacy is a form of personal security. That's why we lock the doors at night.

[–] Limfjorden@feddit.dk 12 points 2 weeks ago

Ask if he closes the door when he's on the toilet. Everyone knows what is going on in there and it's nothing illegal, but it's still something most people rather do behind a closed door, because... privacy matters.

[–] blackbelt352@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

Ask him to share the passwords to all his bank accounts, when he refuses to just highlight that there are plenty of non-illegal things that you want to keep hidden.

[–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 week ago

"Why do you shit with the door closed? What are you doing there, drugs?"

[–] mundane@piefed.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

Do they lock the door to the bathroom? Why? What illegal activities are they doing in there?

If you lock the door to the bathroom you must acknowledge that there are valid reasons for privacy even if you don't do anything illegal.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Great, can you give me your phone and unlock it so I can scroll through it?

You have nothing to hide right? Also if you could keep the door to the bathroom open that'd be great!

Usually gets the point across very quickly

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"May I see your browser history?"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OshagHennessey@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

"Do you shit with the door open?"

"Why? Are you hiding something?"

"To make sure you're not hiding anything, I need you to shit with the door open from now on."

Eventually, they'll justify their need for privacy. When they do, agree with them.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] r0ertel@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

While targeted advertisements may be nice because it's only showing you things that they think that you'll want/need/like, the other side of surveillance based advertising is surveillance pricing.

Surveillance pricing analyzes massive troves of your personal information to predict the price you would be willing to pay for an item—and charge you accordingly. Retailers can charge a higher price when it thinks you can afford to spend more—on payday, for example. Or when you need something the most, such as in an emergency.

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2024/08/fight-surveillance-pricing-we-need-privacy-first

[–] MSBBritain@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If you have the right relationship for it, ask him about the porn he watches, his banking details and how much money he's got in his account, and tell him you'll go buy a billboard to put those on.

Those usually get people quite quickly, but they're also kind of "gotcha!" moments, and people will generally not respond well to them.

If you want a more structured argument, I think you'll need to reframe the issue. As I read your comment (I'm almost certainly missing huge amounts of context that could change this answer drastically) your father's argument is "privacy is bad because it is only used for bad things" and you're actually arguing back "privacy is good because I want to be left alone". But your dad thinks that you shouldn't be left alone, because being left alone means you're doing something bad.

So, don't argue why privacy is good, you need to argue why privacy isn't bad. Find some examples of things he likes that only happened because of privacy. Try to avoid things like revolutions, resistance movements or stuff like that, because it will only reaffirm his view that privacy means you're doing something bad/anti establishment.

This is where the aforementioned porn/finances comes in, since those are usually things people want to keep private, without having negatives attached (depends a bit with porn on morals). Any guilty pleasures that come into mind would also be useful for this.

Also, make the consequences of no privacy more personal. Government whatever, but what about Janet two doors down? What about his boss? What about his parents?

In the end I'd say it's all about the framing of why privacy matters in the first place. Establish a minimum need for privacy, then expand from there. Hope this helps you (or someone else)!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

I bet the Jews had nothing to hide in 1940 when Auschwitz was established. How do you imagine it worked out for them?

You know who has nothing to hide? North Koreans. If they had anything to hide their government would have already killed them.

[–] TerdFerguson@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Hate to break it to you. Dad has abandoned (or never had) critical thinking capabilities.

There isn’t a reasonable argument you can make against his emotional judgements that will get through and change his beliefs.

You might be able to trojan horse some ideas into his head somehow, but taking the direct path of just giving accurate information will not work

[–] Baggie@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Cool, he has nothing to hide, but when people want to get at you, they will invent things. They will decide regular human behaviours are morally abhorrent, and they will have an infrastructure to enforce that. 

It's not about things that are wrong, it's about preventing abusable tools from existing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] omega_x3@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

"Can I look at your browser history and show it to your mom?"

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

I'm not worried about what I'm doing, I'm worried about the intentions of those looking

[–] DeuxChevaux@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They may have nothing to hide but probably something to protect like their credit card numbers, social security numbers and much more. Or they are on the playground with their grandchildren and there's that weird guy with a camera taking pictures of the little ones. Maybe nothing to hide but really something to protect.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chunes@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Someone who says "I actually really like ads" is a broken person. No exceptions.

If he’s old he’s not going to understand…plain and simple. My boomer mom is completely unable to grasp privacy no matter how I explain it to her.

The reason you want security is because of scams and viruses…generally not because the government is trying to bust you for something you’re hiding. 

[–] not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If you have nothing to hide why go into your bedroom to have sex when you can do it in front of the window where everybody can see? I mean it's not like you are doing anything illegal? Right?

Right?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 weeks ago

EVERYONE has stuff to hide.

It may not be illegal, but there are a lot of stuff I don't want to be public knowledge, as it would be highly embarrassing if they got out.

This is the same for everyone.

Then we need to discuss the illegal stuff, I am talking about stuff you wont even realize is illegal, or things that you did decades ago that is so minor that you never even thought about them.

In my generation, one classic part of growing up was torrenting just about anything you could find. I never considered it illegal at the time, but I sure as hell wouldn't want the popo start investigating me.


I see it like this, if you have nothing to hide, you can't be trusted.


As for your father's misplaced blame, he should be annoyed that neither of you wrote down the password, not that you used a word as a password.

[–] Scottyc65@reddthat.com 7 points 1 week ago

I like to think I have nothing to hide but who decides what is worth hiding and what is not?

[–] BaroqueBobby@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I usually answer that with some version of “OK, do you mind if I put cameras all over the inside of your house and have my neighbor watch the feed?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ProbablyBaysean@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

A quick quip is: I dont suppose you own curtains? Humans have a harder time conceptually thinking of privacy like curtains.

[–] finalarbiter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Ask if they're chill leaving the bathroom door open next time they use the restroom so you can watch. They have nothing to hide, right?

Edit: fixed a typo

load more comments
view more: next ›