this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
53 points (98.2% liked)

Canada

10284 readers
720 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This FinPost article is very thin. Not exactly providing adequate information for their target financial market readers.

I appreciate the OP’s effort to bring a diversity of news sources here, but this isn’t a particularly useful article other than to flag the announcement.

The Ontario government news release itself has more contextual information despite being written to promote the decision to consider an expansion.

The CBC story weighs some of the risks and concerns.

[–] darcmage@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago

Thank you.

Non-amp CBC link for those that need it.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 2 years ago

Hopefully this can start a trend. Nuclear is much cleaner than fossil fuels could ever hope to be, and it puts less radioactivity into the atmosphere than coal.

Also we have literal shit tons of raw ore, and if they use reactors that use recycled fuel rods the waste issue becomes easy to manage.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 years ago

Nice to see them expanding capacity.

I'm also interested in the small modular reactors they are looking to test at Darlington.

[–] Sir_Osis_of_Liver@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

4,800 megawatts? If that sneaks in under $40B, I'd be surprised. They might get electrons flowing by 2040 if they start the public hearings immediately and expedite the process. More likely, they're looking at closer to 2050. So many qualified people have left the industry due to age, or lack of prospects, that I'm not even sure if it can be built at this stage.

They should get serious and remove the offshore wind moratorium and get busy erecting generation on the lakes. At least that way they'd have some power coming on stream within 3-5 years.