this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2026
1155 points (98.2% liked)

Anarchism

2809 readers
9 users here now

Discuss anarchist praxis and philosophy. Don't take yourselves too seriously.


Other anarchist comms


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 7 points 2 weeks ago

Comrades, we have to be comfortable calling capitalists “larcenists/thieves/robers/stealers” so folks actually get the problem.

[–] Aljernon@lemmy.today 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I'd be doing pickup truck stuff. I'm already that guy to my friends, family, and coworkers. Dump runs, moving, transporting large purchases like furniture, or bulk purchases like potting soil. Hell, sometimes I get free wood from trees cut down to drag home, split, and give away free to the neighbors. I've definitely thought to myself before that with a salary and a gas budget I'd be content with just doing that all the time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

But nobody would be motivated to work if they grow up in a world where the broken ppl fixed everything so nobody becomes broken enough for their trauma to motivate them to obsessively fix the things that caused their trauma! We'd all die! Civilization would collapse! We need to traumatize ppl so they'd have ambition.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wakko@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The problem is more definitional than anything else.

The basic proposition is to do valuable work, as others define value, in exchange for whatever you consider equivalent compensation.

If others don't see value in alternative ways of operating, you can help define it for them. Map any activity to either money made, money saved, or time saved, or maintenance avoided/automated and just watch how the tone of those "stick to your job description" conversations change.

As soon as you learn to put what matters to you in terms that matter to others, this problem is a whole lot easier to solve.

[–] i_ben_fine@midwest.social 3 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

The guy obsessed with driving a bus or unclogging pipes isn't necessarily the same guy who can defend the value of those tasks. The profit motive redirects a lot of effort away from the task that needs doing to convincing others the task needs doing and for a living wage. But perhaps every imagined economic model will have a Convincing Stage. That could still be streamlined by removing the wage debate and guaranteeing everyone a livelihood.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] andrew@mastodon.furrow.me 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

@Five this is fascinating. I’m sure I’m not alone in this: even just the internal bureaucracy and culture within a company suppresses (smothers) people, and, in some cases, deliberately prevents them from doing what they’re best at. I’m sure the theoretical free plumber you mentioned would be seen as a threat to the livelihoods of 50 different hedge fund backed outfits here in Las Vegas (Goettl for example…🖕you Goettl).

[–] Ach@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

I'm a pipefitter and I can guarantee all my peers would do if not a wage slave is percocets. Definitely not electively fixing pipes.

[–] m3t00@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

greed corruption uneducated lazy. if all crimes are legal, there's nothing stopping an easy fix. lawyers run cover by dragging things out for fees. the mad plumber would work for free if he didn't have bills to pay.

[–] insomniac199@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Great insight.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›