this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2026
68 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

79355 readers
4180 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
68
Supreme Court To Decide How 1988 Videotape Privacy Law Applies To Online Video (arstechnica.com)
submitted 3 hours ago by Innerworld@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
5 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dan@upvote.au 7 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Interesting case. If the plaintiff wins, I suspect this will mean that sites with videos won't be able to use third-party analytics scripts (not just Meta pixel, but also things like Google Analytics), which would be a pretty large change for the industry.

I'd love to see first-party tracking become more popular again. I self-host Plausible for my sites, but I've considered switching to Swetrix.

[–] Savaran@lemmy.world 24 points 3 hours ago

Well, in the least consumer friendly fashion given this court.

[–] dance_ninja@lemmy.world 13 points 2 hours ago

The Supreme Court is taking up a case on whether Paramount violated the 1988 Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA) by disclosing a user’s viewing history to Facebook. The case, Michael Salazar v. Paramount Global, hinges on the law’s definition of the word “consumer.”

[–] rmt_online@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Depending on how they rule, this could set us back about a couple of decades!!! :-(