this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2026
1177 points (99.6% liked)

Microblog Memes

10249 readers
3326 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If a post is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Be nice. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements to private messages.
  7. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] biggerbogboy@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I find it so funny how I use Spotify daily*, and the account is linked** to my google account that I use a lot, and in the past I made sure to downvote any ads that don’t fit my interests at all, so basically giving as much aminition to give some good targeted ads to me.

Turns out, after all that, I get rubbish collection ads, face mask ads and wastewater management ads, even though I have truly never thought about any of those nor have shown interest in them, AND I’ve shown tons of interest in only technology.

Asterisks(*) - I use the iOS mobile app, so I can’t really block ads unfortunately, even though I’d love to :/

(**) - I made the google and Spotify accounts when I was in my early teens, so I didn’t really know or care about digital footprint or tracking, so if I was able to go back, I would’ve at the very least gotten multiple google accounts to sandbox my activities. But hey, better late than never I guess!

[–] uberfreeza@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

I have a similar account for everything that I expect to have some form of tracking. Yet all of these services that are supposed to spy on me to find out exactly what I'm interested in have not once succeeded in targeted me with advertising for something I have any interest in getting. I've only seen them work for people who have Facebook or something that actively listens for things to make ads about, which I don't have.

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 15 points 3 hours ago

i think advertising purposes are just a front. They use it for something, but ads is just an afterthought/excuse for public.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 33 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

I think it was proctor gamble that zeroed out their $200 million yearly adtech spend and saw zero impact to their sales from it. There's a good possibility we're making everything terrible just so that Zuckerberg and friends can keep getting richer to nobody else's actual benefit.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 5 points 1 hour ago

Yeah, I dare say there's companies that benefit from it, but P&G is one of those companies that exist purely on creatures of habit buying the same big branded boxes every month, because they haven't fallen quite far enough in life to consider supermarket-brand products.

In much the same way as nobody ever got fired for buying IBM, no clueless husband ever got told off for bringing home P&G branded fanny pads.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 22 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

I lived in a country where people don't speak English. There's a sizable expat community of English speaking workers there. The ad targeting was so useless that I was constantly shown ads in a language I couldn't understand. This was on an Android phone where everything was set to English. With every single interaction I with any app or web page I was broadcasting the language I know, and yet they couldn't figure even that absolutely critical detail out.

This targeting was so bad that an old fashioned newspaper ad printed in ink next to a story would have been more effective. At least a publisher is going to put English ads in an English newspaper, German ads in a German newspaper, etc.

If the ad companies can't even figure out the language(s) that their targets understand, their knowledge of their target must be essentially zero.

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago

when i used apps with targeted ads, amongst generic type of stuff i also used to get two polar opposites of ads:

  1. ah, we see you're in poland and use english a lot, want to learn english?

  2. ah, we see you're in poland and use english a lot, we can help you get your immigration papers for legal employment

both at the same time btw. apparently being a polish national who speaks english fluently marked me as some sort of ad-anomaly

the ads also believed that i was a senior? at some point i even got a spam call inviting me to join a study on back pain T–T like bro you're at least 10 years early, relax

[–] MousePotatoDoesStuff@lemmy.world 8 points 11 hours ago

It works well enough to get returns on ad spend.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 30 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Everyone likes to think the ads don't work.

The ads absolutely work.

They work on you as well.

[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

Ads in general, sure. They work wonders, even on people who consider themselves immune to advertisement.

The post is about targeted ads, however. Do they really offer any substantial advantage? Let alone one worth all the data harvesting? Probably not.

[–] REDACTED 19 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

People: Ads don't work

Also people: Everyone knows what Raid Shadow Legends is

[–] thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 hours ago

I know what it is, but I cringe at ads and am reluctant to buy anything that has been advertized to me

(Although this is nowhere near the behaviour of the average person, allegedly autism makes ads less effective because we are rational)

I should make a formal "The List" of products not to buy and put advertizers who get past my adblocking there

[–] DeadDigger@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 hours ago

I mean I think it is a game ... Maybe? Something on mobile?

[–] FancyGreg@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 hours ago

And yet I don't know a single person who has ever played it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

It’s because advertising is the pretext for government surveillance

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 13 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

The ads companies hate the government too. They don't want to share their precious data with the government. The government might just turn around and hand it to someone like Palantir. The companies would much prefer to sell it to Palantir.

There's no cozy relationship between the tech companies and the government. The tech companies just want to make money. If the government were buying the data, they might be willing to do it. But, they really hate that governments try to subpoena the data and get it for free.

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 9 hours ago

This was maybe the case back during the Snowden era where the government pushed for compliance and backdoors (like the leaked prism program). That’s the real driving force behind things like e2ee and “privacy forward” steps in the interim that are ultimately just theater. Now if they use XKeyscore to spy on the actual infrastructure of the web it’s not as helpful - WhatsApp, iMessage, etc are all encrypted in transit. But most of these things are not encrypted in a way that prevents the companies from running analytics, selling those analytics to data brokers, who then share with palantir and the NSA (remember Cambridge analytica? Shit like that is an insulating layer so apple, google, and Facebook can now sell your data to the government without directly doing so)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Thorry@feddit.org 47 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (7 children)

The "algorithms" are also dumb as fuck. For example on a large retailer site you spend a couple of hours browsing for a particular kind of item. You are comparing different kinds, looking up reviews and issues, watching YouTube videos about them. And finally you pull the trigger and but the thing. Then for the next 3 months that site (and others that picked up on the research) will go: Hey here are some more of that thing you like, you really liked it right? Would you like to compare some more items? Uhm no, I actually bought said thing, you made the sale. All of that "targeted" advertisement is just wasted, I have zero interest anymore since the need has been filled.

It's either that or stuff I can't afford (like memory or graphic cards) or really weird stuff I have no idea why it's being shown to me. Sometimes very alarmingly so. Just recently I got an ad that said "Popular in your region" and it was for illegal Nazi dogwhistle flags, "self defense knifes", baseball bats and tracksuits. That's a bit scary. On the other hand the same site gave me an ad for an "easy to conceal" blowjob machine sex toy. Like holy shit what kind of people are living in my region?

Targeted ads have been terrible for as long as I can remember. I don't think I ever bought anything through an ad or hardly ever even clicked on them. Only time I click on them is because the site and my adblocker are fighting and when I try to click somewhere on the page, it inserts an ad the last millisecond, shifts the entire page so I accidentally click on it.

[–] thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Illegal nazi flags are "popular in your region" and bought together with weapons? Maybe tip the police off?

Idk how much action they can take on something like this, but it seems like something is going on that shouldn't be.

[–] PumpkinEscobar@lemmy.world 31 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

Amazon thought I was a toilet seat collector for 3-6 months after I bought a 3-pack. No amount of not clicking on those promoted items could convince them otherwise.

[–] axexrx@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

It thought I was a transvestite for lime a year after a Christmas where I bought my my mom a sweater, and my girlfriend jewelery.

Like full on recommending me panties and lingerie in my mens size 32 waist.

[–] Bassman1805@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

FWIW, a good chunk of lingerie ads are meant to target men (assuming they're heterosexual and in a relationship).

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] bytesonbike@discuss.online 149 points 22 hours ago (13 children)

I work in this space and I'm appalled at how much targeted ads make my company.

Every smart person I know is using adblocking too. So is there's like a percentage of people who eats ads all day and open their wallets up?

[–] djdarren@piefed.social 7 points 7 hours ago

Ads Georg, who lives in a cave and looks at adverts 17.7 billion times a day is an outlier and should not be counted.

[–] hesh@quokk.au 133 points 22 hours ago (12 children)

Yes, most people. Adblockers are used by a minority.

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 14 hours ago

It's not actually most. It's just enough to cover the ad spend.

Someone needs to create malware that installs ad blockers. That will more than half their conversion rate.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] EvilFonzy@lemmy.world 53 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 12 minutes ago) (5 children)

They absolutely are. Everything I got from my family this past Christmas was slop from the TikTok shop. They just clicked the first ad they saw and bought whatever. I even got two of the same item because my brother didn't realize he clicked two ads for the same thing. I've been calling it Dropshipmas.

💀

"compliant consumer" is a mental illness

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 52 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (10 children)

I think it's different if you consider ads as a way to maintain the status quo.

Like, there's an ad I keep seeing on TV where 25 or 6 to 4 by Chicago plays as parents struggle to keep up with the parenting responsibilities of their toddlers. It's an ad for Amazon. And thank god for Amazon for being available to help these parents.

And like...everybody knows about Amazon. Nobody is going to suddenly sign up for a Prime account after seeing this ad. However, parents or expecting parents who already have Prime accounts are going to relate to the people in the ad and not even consider other options for their parenting needs.

Maybe a very specific example, and their are certainly ads just telling you to buy chicken nuggets, but I'm seeing it more and more.

Edit: Or hell, look at detergents. Do you really think Tide has innovated anything in the past 30 years?

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›