They dont have to decrypt the channel. The app just has to run a screenshot every half second or so and pass that back to an ai/ ocr and there you have it.
Surprised more people werent up in arms when ms proposed that, uh, 'feature' for windows.
this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2026
64 points (98.5% liked)
News
34571 readers
3280 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
How anyone would believe Meta wasn't full of shit about privacy is a moron.
It has been public for a long time that they have access to your contacts and metadata (who you talk to, how much, when, from where, etc.) That was bad enough. But this is the first time I've heard about accessing message content. Really chilling.
The headline makes it sound like they have access to all you call, but the text make it sound like it’s just the WhatsApp calls history and contacts and that’s… obvious?
If they actually have access to message that and it is t end-2-end encrypted at all is on a whole different level.
It’s not just “Account A contacted account B.” And that’s it.
It’s more like “Account B using their Facebook profile contacted from a mobile device in Minnesota via an IP address that is known to Meta as a VPN address to connect Account A also using their Facebook profile, who answered from a laptop in Mexico City. The two communicated for 90 minutes and Account B terminated the call.”
It may not be Meta knows everything exactly but it’s a footprint they can follow.
I don't use WhatsApp, because I'm a homebody and none of the ten people I want to talk to use it. (Plus,.meta. Ugh.)
But the test for "is their encryption good enough to keep them from reading your messages" really needs to be "can you trivially lock yourself out of sent messages".
If it's easy for you to set up a new device and chat with your existing contacts without manually entering a code, then it'll be equally easy for them to set up a fake device pretending to be you and read all of the same things.
I don't use WhatsApp, so...
I totally believe WhatsApp that it's e2e encrypted. BUT my personal solution would be to just send chat, differently encrypted, back to WA, as the app obviously can read the chats anyway. So noone would actually lie about a working e2e.
Some companies are trying to redefine E2E as HTTPS... I doubt Facebook is that naive though.
They are probably doing the iMessage trick. The message is encrypted with "your keys", but you can't see your keys, and you can't know if the survaliance key is added to your keys.
Yeah or that. Even simpler. Still technically not lying. But whoever uses those things: their own fault.