this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2026
311 points (98.7% liked)

Fuck AI

6623 readers
1090 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 230 points 2 months ago (5 children)

He lost his chat logs. I was going to mock him him for not backing up his work but I'm not sure I want to punch down on someone who considers his LLM chat logs research.

[–] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 67 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Wait wait wait. ALL of his research was in his chat logs in chat gpt‽ So NONE of his research was outside of chat gpt.

I'm not sure it's meaningful to call that research

[–] monkeyFromTheLake@programming.dev 23 points 2 months ago

ChatGPT did the world a favour it seems

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 3 points 2 months ago

It might have been a research on ChatGPT itself, like glitch token archaeology

[–] a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 33 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Nah, that's fucking stupid on his part and he should 100% know better.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Absolutely. Angela Collier did a video on this where she kind of roasted the guy. Imagine openly stating that you haven't actually worked for the past two years, by saying "hey guys just a word of warning, if you click the delete button it'll delete stuff."

Brain is mush.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] flango@lemmy.eco.br 9 points 2 months ago

I think that scientists embracing AI so naively as this guy contribute to a larger discredit in science. Probably we will have in the future antivax people saying that " such and such vaccines were made of AI slop".

[–] RustyNova@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Same for me but the reason is different

... I don't want to punch down someone for not using backups while I probably have a lot stored on sites and ready to be wiped accidentally

[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

He basically deleted them

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 85 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 36 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

As someone who knows a decent bit about machine learning, I can say Dr. Collier seems to know very little of how it works on a technical level, which presents such a beautiful contrast when I'm watching her be fucking dead-on about its societal consequences. Seeing someone who isn't familiar with the field but still knows what they're talking about is so cathartic in a subject strewn with misconceptions from laypeople. Angela's integrity is really admirable; you can tell that critical thinking is a virtue to her and that she takes a lot of care not to overstep into areas she doesn't understand.

[–] eleijeep@piefed.social 4 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Did you write this comment yourself?

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

I always do. I write as a hobby, and I'm not stuck here, so I don't see why I'd be here if I didn't give enough of a shit to write what I want.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mech@feddit.org 66 points 2 months ago (2 children)

ChatGPT's chat history isn't "carefully structured academic work".
He basically used the 0/0/0 backup strategy, with not even one instance of his data saved anywhere.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 5 points 2 months ago

Nor did he do any research at all. There was nothing useful to backup.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 59 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

He disabled the feature because he “wanted to see whether I would still have access to all of the model’s functions if I did not provide OpenAI with my data.”

Well I guess you found out

[–] groucho@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

He should write a paper about it.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

"ChatGPT, write a paper about how you deleted all the previous papers you wrote for me"

[–] udon@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

He did, check the link (well, "paper")

[–] 01189998819991197253 43 points 2 months ago (14 children)

Not really his research when using an LLM to compile the content, now is it...

[–] Flauschige_Lemmata@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If he only used it as a tool, I'd still say it's his work. It should of course be included in the methodology section.

But considering he lost 2 years worth of work, just because his chats got wiped? That's more than just a tool

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

In 2 years, mr scientist never made a backup?

Fake af, can't be real.

The buffoon.

[–] turmacar@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

"Oops all the research was set on fire" is a tale as old as grad students.

In the 2000s it was trusting everything in a multi-year study to a single thumb drive. In the 70s it was carrying the only copy of everything in a single briefcase. Presumably at some point someone was devastated that the rain came early and wiped out all the work on the sand table.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] UltraBlack@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

"Scientist"

"Ay GPT, research this shit for me."

[–] rolfo@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago

The modern day version of "the dog ate my homework!".

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 19 points 2 months ago

Carefully structured academic work?

AI slop has been given a facelift!

[–] brainwashed@feddit.org 12 points 2 months ago

In Germany we say "Kein Backup, kein Mitleid!".

[–] DonPiano@feddit.org 12 points 2 months ago

Lol

Lmao, even

[–] Cyteseer@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

Angela collier just uploaded a video about how embarrassing the original article is. Frankly, the situation is ridiculous and speaks to the brain rot experienced as some people become more reliant on these chatbots, regardless of how intelligent seeming some individuals may start off.

[–] public_image_ltd@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This moron is even labelled as a „professor“ at cologne university. There goes my respect for the German educational system.

[–] RamenDame@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I wonder if he could get face consequences because he was sloppy. I mean he is a Beamter, a Prof, and he has to lead by example. Here is the science policy of the University. He is responsible.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] homes@piefed.world 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

I eat a lot of cheese. My shit is already backed up.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

i do backups 3 times a year. i hope that's enough

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ebolapie@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Can you imagine coauthoring a paper with this guy? Or being one of his students?

Thinking back to some of my college professors...yes.

[–] Tetragrade@leminal.space 10 points 2 months ago
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 months ago

If is was really "Intelligence" then it would have saved a backup copy first. "AWTF?" is a more fitting name for it.

[–] november@piefed.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] RustyNova@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

An accent!? On my "lot of laughter"!?

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 2 months ago

and science papers are being found with AI content in them in journals, im not surprised.

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Claude, I need some experiment data. Make some will ya?

load more comments
view more: next ›