Today you can walk to the shops.
Tomorrow you're in a Siberian gulag.
Slippery fucking slope.
A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!
1. Be Civil
You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.
2. No hate speech
Don't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.
3. Don't harass people
Don't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.
4. Stay on topic
This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.
5. No reposts
Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.
Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.
In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:
Today you can walk to the shops.
Tomorrow you're in a Siberian gulag.
Slippery fucking slope.
Traffic restrictions will promote getting where the fuck you want to be on any sort of schedule
A true Orwellian dystopia
Oh, look. The Torygraph.
There's a conspiracy theory that what 15 minute cities secretly means is that you'll be confined in a sector of the city and unable to leave without a permit or something.
Why anyone would think that, no idea!
Possibly because that’s actually what the fascists want.
I don't think it makes any logical sense. It doesn't need to, because that's not the point.
Repeat the buzzwords (15 minute cities, WEF, replacement theory, etc) on Facebook or Twitter and the lunatic followers/bots will magically appear to follow, like and subscribe you up the social media pages.
Authoritarians are poor at distinguising "is allowed to" from "is forced to." This is also why they hate gay people-- they think that if someone else is allowed to be gay, that'll mean that everyone will be compelled to.
The reality is that they fear freedom. They like the taste of boot.
And why would a bunch of never-left-their-staters even care in the first place? They clearly don't want freedom of movement
Yeah because in their dreams girls should be compelled to have sex with them, so it's a kind of twisted but understandable logic I guess.
In car-centric American cities however, that would be impossible. You can't just block the single street that leads out of the neighborhood!
Oh, wait.
Why anyone would think that, no idea!
Because that's what Republicans would do, obviously.
Oh no, imagine life being convenient
It's horrible. I've had to give up my beloved 90-minute commute, and if I want something from a shop, I have to got off my lazy arse and spend a couple of minutes walking over there, instead of wasting 20 minutes each way driving to some nightmarish big-box retail hellhole in the outskirts of the city.
And let's not even talk about the clean air and nearly complete absence of road-raging premature-ejaculator drivers speeding along the city streets.
You seem to have skipped over the part where there’s no job at all without that commute
When they argue in bad faith, they’ll say anything and never waver from it to further their agenda.
"every opinion different than mine is stalinist!" said the chugs with their mouths full of mcnuggets and cheap beer.
Don't drag cheap beer into this!
Expensive beer is Stalinist
It's Stalinist to want to cut down on car dependency and actually have a livable place.
Really, the one thing we need to do is reduce car dependency to where you don't have to drive everywhere, and make it to where driving is completely optional at the very least.
"[...] “perverse” and “Stalinist” approach to social control, adding: “It is an encroachment on civil liberties, and it is a page out of the East Germany playbook. With the 15-minute city, you will have to, in effect, apply for an internal passport to go and visit your granny."
That's nothing new. Fossil fuel funded desinformation and their not-less-desinformation-loving right-wing friends have a long history of telling the fairy tale of 15-min cities as a kind of population control.
It's all based on the basic premise that car-brains can't understand that "you cannot go there freely by car" is not the same as "you cannot go there freely at all". So when you tell them that you can only drive somewhere a limited number of times per year before paying a fee for using their car, their brain-damage automatically translates it to "I'm not allowed to go there anymore".
PS: Bringing the "East-German playbook" into this story makes it even more absurd, given the (non-)availability of cars and thus the quality of public transport in the ex-GDR. But that's another thing car-brains can't understand, so they will not see the problem.
It's called a train ticket and it should be subsidized too
This is the Telegraph talking about Labour government plans. Of course they would present it like that.
I personally think the better way is to make people realize themselves that not driving is the better option. Linking omnipresent cameras with driver databases to implement a vague system of fines administered by the councils does not instill me with enough confidence either. I see contested fines clogging up courtrooms (or whatever legal recourse there must be) for years.
Raise parking fees, reduce parking spaces - at a relatively slow rate to keep predictable outrage local and small enough. Implement a system where every car purchase needs to be accompanied by a proof of parking like in Japan (owned driveway or rented spot). Invest in public transport and infrastructure for pedestrians and bicyclists. Tax breaks for infrastructure that's missing (a supermarket, a clinic, a theater, etc.). That would make more sense to me than the threat of punishment through this somewhat Orwellian system.
East Germany was an authoritarian state without rule of law. This can be true at the time as the fact that in most cities they created neighborhoods that come close to this 15-min ideal. Childcare, multi disiplinary medical "poly clinics," and decent public transport. Sure, long lines at the grocery store and an 18 year waiting list to buy a shit car. But it strikes me as extremely dumb to ignore useful lessons from that out of cold war principle.
Fuck the torygraph.
Living in a 15-minute city, it's almost as nice as the previously screeched-about "Shari'a no-go zones" in Paris. I was in one of those when that hysteria started, drinking an excellent bottle of wine with a friend of mine and a charming French-Algerian couple.
And if my quiet little city's modest efforts at pedestrianisation are Stalinist, then I've misunderstood Stalinism and maybe it's not so bad after all (except the purges, the Molotove-Ribbentripp pact and the Holodomor).
Note for the paranoid: you can easily be tracked if you drive a car, though in-car telemetry and ANPR cameras. But you're nearly invisible to the authorities if you're a pedestrian or a cyclist.
the Molotove-Ribbentripp pact
Here's a fun mostly-unknown fact about this one: the pact(s) included military technology transfers, with one result being that advanced anti-aircraft guns earmarked for the battleship Bismarck were instead given to the USSR. Bismarck ended up being fatally crippled by British biplanes.
This is genuinely in bad faith. As far as I can tell, the "15 minute cities" are not some renaissance in urban development with dense housing and mixed-purpose residential and commercial spaces. It's just slapping a steep fine on anybody who drives out of the neighborhood without bothering to check if they actually have access to an Aldi's within their zone, much less where they might be employed. (Oh, don't want to pay 38 pounds every day as a commute toll? Quit your office job and work at the corner store. We did it, we saved the environment!)
They clearly never been to Moscow, they would love it though, a car hellscape.
As it happens, Russian cities saw huge sprawl during the USSR, though probably mostly starting in the sixties. As is usual, the pre-revolution city centre is twisty and cozy, while around it are radiating straight avenues for kilometres. So sorta the opposite of what the headline says.
Straight avenue is not necessarily a bad thing though, if they're high-density, walkable, full of services and green spaces, and interconnected with public transit, as they were.
"Journalism opens the door to writing articles after a frontal lobotomy"
Maybe tankies are the way they are because they live in some bastardized allegory of the cave where all they've ever learned about Stalin is from Duncan White, director of the Alliance of British Drivers.
The tankies I've known have almost all been middle-class contrarian twats. They often convert to the hard right when they get older, maybe because it increases their chances of actually being able to ruin people's lives.
Saying this two days after Michael Parenti's death is really something
new gender neutral bathroom just opened 🥳
That's actually disgusting, talking like that about a fucking socialist activist who spent his life making the lives of others better. The guy was fucking beat up by cops for organizing protests against the Vietnam war, and forbidden from teaching in universities afterwards. Have some fucking respect
I hope all nazbols burn in hell, as he's currently doing right now. genocide deniers are only good as worm food
Is the Telegraph a tabloid? What the fuck is that?
Yes, for at least the last 3-4 decades. It just has smaller print , costs more and only shows metaphysical tits.
so says a voice for the ‘stall in traffic’ demographic