this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2026
350 points (99.4% liked)

politics

29198 readers
2312 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi sent a letter to Minnesota Democratic Governor Tim Walz demanding the state take three specific actions before federal immigration agents would consider reducing their presence in Minneapolis, including handing over voter rolls.

In the letter, Bondi blamed both state and local leaders for the unrest that has come in response to the Trump administration's immigration enforcement operations. She said that Walz could "restore the rule of law."

all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ryrybang@lemmy.world 152 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

before federal immigration agents would consider reducing their presence in Minneapolis,

"Consider" is doing a lot of work there. It guarantees this is an empty promise. I mean, it was anyway, even if it had stronger language, but this means it can be ignored.

Also, why is Bondi blackmailing states? Why are the feds interfering with states' rights?

[–] evenglow@lemmy.world 51 points 2 months ago

It's not a promise. It's Republicans threatening people who they are supposed to be helping.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago

Imagine trusting this bitch at face value

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 104 points 2 months ago (2 children)

She said that Walz could "restore the rule of law."

Classic reverse victim and offender.

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago

Well she said it. Walz needs to mobilize police and deputize citizens to eliminate ice. I mean, I don't think he can ignore the order if it comes from DHS

[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 3 points 2 months ago

she is actually confessing that ICE is continuously breaking the law

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 80 points 2 months ago

Tim, your answer is:

"We, in the United States, do not negotiate with terrorists."

[–] BotsRuinedEverything@lemmy.world 61 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So the fascists say they will stop murdering people if Minnesota just identifies the names and addresses of all people in the state who did not vote for fascism? Jesus. Fucking. Christ.

[–] Kaz@lemmy.org 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They obviously have greater plans for the states they are terrorising.

[–] BotsRuinedEverything@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Prison labor camps.

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 59 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 2 months ago

If you coerce someone to do what you want politically under violence it's usually called terrorism

[–] SkavarSharraddas@gehirneimer.de 14 points 2 months ago

Preparing for election fraud, like their efforts to sue media that reports low Trump approval rates. Gotta make sure that non-Trump voters have difficulties voting e.g. by purging their registrations, and if that's not enough and Trump doesn't win, declare the result as fraudulent because Trump's poll results were so good (because nobody dared report bad results).

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 54 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What the fuck kind of extortion/racketeering is this?

"Our armed thugs will continue terrorizing your constituents until you give us confidential information that can be used to identify anyone who votes against us" fuck outta here!

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 31 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's an open admission that it was never about immigration.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 months ago

At least she looks like she's aging in dog years. It's a small consolation knowing that selling your soul to the devil won't keep your vanity intact for very long. Hatred really does leave its marks on ones face...

[–] tyrant@lemmy.world 40 points 2 months ago

"before they would consider" fuck them. Fuck their bullshit. Even if they complied with these terrorist demands it's not going to have any impact on the ice situation. "We considered and decided not to remove them" same old boring ass playbook.

There is no honor. They have been waging a social war and Democrats keep playing by the old rules.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago

Pam Blondi is a terrorist.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I saw someone say that she's literally from Minnesota, and as such can just pay a $20 processing fee and get the voter rolls thru official means...

They're making a ridiculously easy to fufil demand so idiots don't realize they're not getting anything after the literal extrajudicial executions.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

They don't just want voter rolls. They want voter INFORMATION, including the things that the state collects but isn't normally public, like SSN, party affiliation (sometimes), etc.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago

How about go fuck yourself, Pam. This isn't a negotiation.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago

They need this data to conduct vote tampering.

This is why they want it.

They will target machines with high use of Dem voters.

There is zero reason why the federal government should have that list except for nefarious intentions.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

Oh, Like Kamala wasn’t going to shoot citizens in the head to extort voter information in order to rig the election.

Honestly you liberals are so dumb.

spoiler/s

[–] RandomStickman@fedia.io 14 points 2 months ago

So they're attacking the civilian population and now has released demands to further their political gains?

I think we have a term for those kind of people and we don't negotiate with them.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Never forget she was AG of Florida from 2011 to 2019, and could readily have prosecuted Epstein herself. It's not like he stopped offending in 2008.

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 12 points 2 months ago

the Department of Justice be given the state’s voter registration records, that the state repeal the "sanctuary policies," and share its records on Medicaid, and Food and Nutrition Service programs.

So, let them run free anyway (revoke sanctuary policies), and let them know where everyone lives and how they vote, and what areas should be targeted when they go after the poor, and maybe they'll consider leaving? Fat chance.

The attorney general said that there had been a 1,300 percent increase in violence against ICE officers and a 3,200 percent increase in vehicular attacks against federal agents

Maybe if ICE wasn't targeting PoC regardless of citizenship status, refusing to accept valid documentation, and intentionally escalating the situation in multiple multiple ways, there'd be less "violence" and "vehicle attacks". And, btw, since "violence against ICE" and "vehicular attacks" were miniscule numbers beforehand, a "1300%" and "3200%" increase in those numbers is also still a fairly small number - and that even assumes that what she's describing as "violence against ICE" and "vehicular attacks" actually are such things (which I very sincerely doubt). These are Faux "News" numbers made up by a favorite guest of Faux "News".

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 12 points 2 months ago

Bullshit. What kinda of idiot would believe a lying nazi?

The fascist death squads we built are murdering americans in cold blood, but if you make it easier for us to fake the next election we'll definitely leave you alone.

Sure, very believable. 🙄

[–] gdog05@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Bold request from the people who owe us the Epstein files. Walz should send the 100+ page blacked out PDF to them.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

I see we’ve now hit the “Trump is tired of this and wants to TACO, but you have to make it look like he’s winning something” stage.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 months ago

And so the dollar store Don Corleone wannabe failure again tries a protection racket and nobody bats an eye

If this were Democrats doing it, Republicans would (rightfully so) literally throw hell around, but Republicans do it and meh, Maga is fine with it

Fuck these clowns

[–] ruuster13@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 months ago

Zoom in on the photo of Bondi in the article. She's starting to look like The Joker. You cannot hide what's inside.

[–] Jerb322@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Why? What do they expect to find?

[–] Maiq@piefed.social 37 points 2 months ago

Democrat voters to be purged before midterm elections.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 24 points 2 months ago

More victims to harass and assault.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Well shit, Bondi's demands are in line with Stalin, Hitler, Mussolini, Franco and Mao.

[–] Oyml77@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Pam Bondi is gruesome cunt.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

What about the regimes' narrative that ICE's presence is necessary and there are dangerous criminals they're looking for? Surely if ICE needed to be there, they wouldn't be able to pull back in exchange for voter info

[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

No. Fuck you

[–] 0ndead 5 points 2 months ago

Too bad Pam Bondi’s dad didn’t offer to pull out

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Criminal bitch is trying to blackmail them. Report that shit

[–] NOPper@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

To whom? The US Attorney General? SCOTUS? This shit is raining down from the highest levels of government and nobody's been held accountable for breaking the law yet. 🤷‍♂️

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Should at least try the scotus. Might shame them into doing something since its all their fault

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Evil fucks gonna evil.

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

Will the US act?? Or nah.