this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2026
311 points (98.1% liked)

Just Post

1265 readers
244 users here now

Just post something ๐Ÿ’›

Lemmy's general purpose discussion community with no specific topic.

Sitewide lemmy.world rules apply here.

Additionally, this is a no AI content community. We are here for human interaction, not AI slop! Posts or comments flagged as AI generated will be removed.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 43 points 5 days ago

Time to level that bunch of old hovels and finally build something sensible.

[โ€“] hakase@lemmy.zip 37 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Surprisingly enough, the infrastructure needed to support millions of people is a lot larger than the infrastructure needed to support a few tens of thousands.

The enormous Gare du Nord, Paris, for example (also population 0):

[โ€“] knatschus@discuss.tchncs.de 33 points 5 days ago (1 children)

That looks alot smaller even with the buildings surrounding it.

[โ€“] alcibiades@sh.itjust.works 17 points 4 days ago

also transports significantly more people than a single of the dozens of interchanges in Houston

[โ€“] VibeSurgeon@piefed.social 1 points 3 days ago

This is comparing apples to oranges - Gare du Nord supports far, far more transportation than the highway interchange does.

[โ€“] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 35 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You sure nobody's living under those ramps and overpasses?

I can confirm a population size of at least half a dozen. Drive under that spot regularly

[โ€“] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago (3 children)

7.8 million people in the Houston metro area, no shit the infrastructure is huge.

[โ€“] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's also one of the least walkable cities in America, which is saying something

[โ€“] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yes, but y'all have ungodly car infrastructure to accommodate for the lack of anything else. You make LA look like Europe

[โ€“] ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Expand that out to the greater Houston area to include everyone who drives to work every day and you have a highway system that needs to accommodate 10s of millions of people using it every day.

needs to accomodate

Wants to accomodate. Induced demand is a thing.

It also works in reverse: Slowly remove lanes and sooner or later it will somehow accomodate everyone that needs to use it. Either by making the inner city more dense or by businesses moving away and distributing more.

[โ€“] Blackmist@feddit.uk 13 points 4 days ago

With this administration's time and dedication, you too can have 30,000 people living under an intersection.

[โ€“] glimse@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

Anything but metric

That's a Houston interchange? No frontage road, no uturn lanes, no separated speeding zone? Texas has worse.

[โ€“] Steve@startrek.website 9 points 4 days ago

The highway has more green space

[โ€“] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

America has so much land it can waste it. Italy needs it to live.

[โ€“] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

One is beautiful, been there, seen it, it's amazing

The other is a horrendous post apocalyptic wasteland. Never been there, never will.

[โ€“] knightly@pawb.social 4 points 4 days ago

I know that urban wasteland well. I was born in it, molded by it. I didn't see a green space until I was already a them. XD

[โ€“] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

True but that intersection is probably connecting between Houston and Austin which supports ~3M