this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2026
-22 points (15.6% liked)

science

23798 readers
523 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Human penis size may indicate male attractiveness and fighting ability, with a larger size more attractive to women and more likely to intimidate rivals, according to Australian and South African researchers. The team asked more than 600 male and 200 female participants to rate computer-generated male figures that varied in height, body shape, and penis size. Women rated the figures’ sexual attractiveness, while men assessed how threatening they found them, both in terms of fighting ability and as a sexual rival. Women rated taller male figures with a higher shoulder-to-hip ratio (indicating a more V-shaped body) and a larger penis as being more attractive, but only up to a point, when further increases in penis size made little difference. Males also rated taller figures with more V-shaped bodies and larger penises as being more intimidating, both as sexual rivals and fighting opponents. But, in contrast to females, men consistently ranked males with ever larger penises as more of a sexual threat, suggesting they overestimate the importance of penis size in attracting a mate. These pressures may help explain why humans evolved larger penises than other primates, the authors conclude.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kalkulat@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

Down under? of course!

Scimex : science in Australia, New Zealand and the Pacific

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Women rated taller male figures with a higher shoulder-to-hip ratio (indicating a more V-shaped body) and a larger penis as being more attractive, but only up to a point,

Out of pure scientific curiosity of the friend that wants to know this but not me: to WHAT point exactly? 😁

Seriously: what a stupid article...

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This sounds... absolutely stupid and subjective.

Women rated taller male figures with a higher shoulder-to-hip ratio (indicating a more V-shaped body) and a larger penis as being more attractive, but only up to a point, when further increases in penis size made little difference.

How would you even know? What's the control here? Between two people, how would you classify these variables without distinction aside from just throwing a marble in a jar. 🙄

[–] anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I find it harder to believe someone can rate any of these monsters as sexually attractive:

But with those it would be very easy to let then rate a whole bunch of monsters where only one of the variables differ - such as penis size.

[–] jayambi@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Somehow the hips dont get narrower and now the small dude looks like a bowling skittle... maybe thats why he isn't attractive lol

"* You have to choose one option"

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

How would you even know? What’s the control here? Between two people, how would you classify these variables

Are you confused about how a woman can tell the difference between two drawings of different heights?

Cuz like, if you can figure out how they can differentiate that, then it should be pretty easy to figure out the other two.

I'm willing to bet that 99.999% of the human population can see two separate visual representations of a dick and balls, and accurately determine which is larger.

If you can't evaluate differences of sizes/shapes with human anatomy, that's like some kind of "whole body blindness" which is probably just as common as bird blindness...

[–] dogbert@lemmy.zip -4 points 1 day ago

Uh oh, the men are upset 😆

[–] brooke592@sh.itjust.works -5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Anyone with a dig bick knows this.

[–] jayambi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

DATING SITES HATE THAT ONE TRICK