Not The Onion

21101 readers

300 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

kescusay@lemmy.world

848

Anger as suspect in $100M jewelry heist said to be biggest in US history avoids standing trial – because ICE deported him (www.independent.co.uk)

submitted 2 months ago by bytesonbike@discuss.online to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

89 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Last month, federal officials allegedly deported one of the suspects in a massive 2022 jewelry heist in Southern California where thieves made off with $100 million in merchandise, in what prosecutors have called the largest jewelry heist in U.S. history.

Jeson Nelon Presilla Flores was sent to Ecuador on or about December 29, according to court documents obtained by The Los Angeles Times. He was believed to be linked to a raid on a Brinks truck that netted a fortune in stolen jewels, gold and watches.

(page 2) 41 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 5 points 2 months ago

I hope the insurance company sues DHS/ICE for assisting with his escape.

[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Task failed successfully

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 months ago

To bad he didn't face a trial

[–] maid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago

stonks

[–] NorthoftheBorder@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

Incompetence and cruelty are the hallmarks of this administration.

[–] E_coli42@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

extradition?

[–] T156@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (8 children)

The criminal is no longer in the country, as they voluntarily self-deported. Extradition would no longer be possible.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Do you know what extradition is? If he's in a country with extradition deals with the US, the US can ask to be arrested and send back to the US to be judge

[–] Lucelu2@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago

I bet this guy can pay people enough to forget they saw him. He can change his name and go no contact.

[–] T156@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Ah, I see. I thought that they meant that the US should extradite the criminal.

Though if he voluntarily self-deported to escape the trial, it seems rather unlikely that he would have chosen a country with extradition deals with the US. That seems like it would just be going in a circle.

load more comments (7 replies)

load more comments