this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2026
337 points (95.9% liked)

Explain Like I'm Five

20769 readers
92 users here now

Simplifying Complexity, One Answer at a Time!

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If you havent read it, Sun Tzu's Art of War is a real thinker.

[–] Patnou@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What page is it on actually? I have one by my beside along with Machiavelli the prince.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 months ago

Oh you can tell them to piss off. But they have more guns than you do.

[–] shirro@aussie.zone 7 points 2 months ago

This is very satisfying in a schadenfreude kind of way. I have been lectured to by Americans and those influenced by them for decades about the importance of their constitutional freedoms to shoot children and spread hate speech.

Some liberal western democracies don't even have a codified constitution and still have better human rights and fairer government than the USA. Without a well functioning representative democracy with preferential or proportional voting, concentrating enormous executive power in a single tyrant without strong protections was always obviously exploitable.

I think a lot of them are still living in denial and think the good guys are going to come in and defend the constitution at the last minute. Hope they are right. It is one hell of a gamble for them and the rest of us.

[–] BussyGyatt@feddit.org 7 points 2 months ago

Yeah, but. They have guns. So.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Laws are only laws when they're enforced. After decades of training law enforcement to hate and fear the average citizen, they don't care to enforce laws that exist to protect those citizens.

And don't tell me it's always been that way. It's a matter of degrees and there's been a effort for decades to normalize police violence. It was bad, but it's been engineered to be worse.

[–] Skkorm@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Laws are threats made by the dominant socioeconomic ethnic power in a given nation, it's just a promise of violence enacted with the police acting as an occupying army.

And if the police don't enforce those threats, they have no meaning. The police are not enforcing the laws that ICE is breaking, and therefore what they're doing is effectively legal.

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 months ago

The Constitution also gives Congress the right to a constitutional convention. This means that it can be possible for the US to become socialist by way of constitutional reform. Seriously!

[–] Rhoeri@piefed.world 4 points 2 months ago (4 children)

They’re all above the law. That’s how. Democracy and law and order are gone.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The asswipes have yet to apply their SS and NKVD home invasions in a Stand Your Ground Oblast.

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 months ago

Minnesota supports castle doctrine, or so I've read.

[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

The constitution give you a right to organize 30 of your neighbors, armed with guns, and chase them out of your neighborhood.

You also have the right to put buckshot into the face of anyone who illegally breaks into your home.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

As if Trumps GeStaPo would care about the Constitution! The rule of law died in the US about a year ago.

[–] TheTimeKnife@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Its not, republicans stacked the courts so they can violate the law and republicans in congress are cheering them on.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

This is a nontrivial legal question.

Of course there needs to be a way for government agents to enforce immigration laws (like all other laws) and also enter private places for that purpose. You don't have an automatic right to tell them to piss off because you don't like certain laws being enforced.

What kind of warrant or situation they need exactly, courts may already have decided, or will still decide. It's obviously legal for government agents to enter homes with certain warrants, and sometimes without warrants; whether the exact thing the linked article is about will or will not be found constitutional, no one here can ELI5 to you with any certainty.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Wow. ELI5 on Lemmy is way different from ELI5 on Reddit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] abbiistabbii@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago

Bold of you to think the law means anything to a state that doesn't care for your rights. 

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›