this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2026
779 points (98.7% liked)

News

36889 readers
4428 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Turns out all you need is a Supreme Court majority on your side and you can wipe your ass with the Constitution.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ScrambledEggs@lazysoci.al 10 points 2 months ago (4 children)

It is legal to booty trap your own house. Unrelated, just a funny thought.

[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

No, that's illegal. But AFAIK in all states you can wait inside your door with a shotgun and blast anyone who breaks into your home illegally.

Better yet, you have the constitutional right to organize 30 or your neighbors to use guns to protect each other from marauding thugs.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] itistime 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Fight back! But consider:

  1. Why do they want direct violence with their thugs?
  2. Direct violence with ICE leads to direct violence with police, MAGA civi-thugs and military.
  3. Would MAGA base have the same violent and visceral reaction if violent events happened to wealthy folks whom they probably never heard of who live in disconnected realities from their own??? A thought tickles my mind that maybe they would not. Maybe it’s a pathway…
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Turns out all you need is a Supreme Court majority on your side and you can wipe your ass with the Constitution.

Same as it's always been, they're just being more brazen about it

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

That's funny, because I say I can shoot someone for an armed unlawful entry. So either the law is on my side, or the laws are illegitimate and are irrelevant anyway. I guess we'll just have to disagree.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 6 points 2 months ago

Nowhere in that article did it even imply that the Supreme Court would support warrantless entry into a person's home. In fact, it said that this policy contradicts many years of court precedent.

This is just more legal manipulation of the Constitution. Just have some psychopath MAGA traitor INVENT his own law, write it down (because he's one of the few that can), and all the rest of them can wink and agree that since it is written down, and called a MEMO, it is perfectly legal, and a reasonable basis for an entire predatory and parasitic paramilitary enforcement operation. It is NOT.

However, they will proceed as of it is, without tipping anyone off for as long as possible, and when it finally gets discovered, and challenged in court, they'll slowly drag it through the legal process, all the whole continuing to follow the policy as if it is a perfectly legal and reasonable policy that is just having a little regulatory snafu, as peoples' lives get systematically destroyed, along with all of America.

[–] taterthotsalad@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

They won’t like that with a Constitutionalist.

[–] BotsRuinedEverything@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (18 children)

They will absolutely come for the guns next. Once the population is disarmed the civil war will begin. Martial law. Police state. No privacy protections. All amendments abolished. Civil rights act abolished. Military checkpoints at all state borders. Reinstated draft. 10% inflation. 20% unemployment. Reeducation centers. Prison work camps. State takeover of media. Iron curtain. Restricted Internet.

This year. Get out while the borders are open.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 9 points 2 months ago

Don't got the money for that. My best option is to fight, provided the people of my state are also willing to die for a better future.

[–] Aermis@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Other than the black Panthers ain't nobody already with guns doing anything right now.

[–] crypt0cler1c 8 points 2 months ago (5 children)

If you think they will take guns away from Americans in 2026 at any kind of scale you are very naive

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Doesn't mean they won't try

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›