this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2026
1098 points (99.6% liked)

Microblog Memes

10249 readers
3326 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If a post is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Be nice. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements to private messages.
  7. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ZombieCyborgFromOuterSpace@piefed.ca 129 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Motherfuckers have been buying people out of their homes, emptying entire neighborhoods just to get access to land near power plants and near water sources to build their AI data centers, they've been polluting drinking water sources and siphoning the electricity of entire towns, and polluting like crazy, and they're affraid society might not accept their useless AI porn generating bullshit? Because let's face it, that's what it's mostly used for.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 22 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Where did they buy neighborhoods to bulldoze them?

[–] ZombieCyborgFromOuterSpace@piefed.ca 60 points 5 days ago (2 children)
[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 26 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Wow is right, those people made a massive profit on their homes.

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world -1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They reportedly paid an average of around $950,000 per house — which was significantly above what that land would have been worth as residential

Why are you trying to make it seem like the homeowners have been screwed over? It makes no fucking sense.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There is a reason they all sold. But that it is happening is still crazy. As if there is no empty space anywhere?

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

It doesn't matter. They didn't hold a gun to anyone's head. It's hard to imagine anyone being dumb enough to not realizer what a gift that is.

What's crazy is people acting like this is some kind conspiracy that screwed over the homeowners, who made out like bandits.

[–] cron@feddit.org 25 points 5 days ago (1 children)

For example in Illinois:

The rush to build data centers has become the new Oklahoma land grab, with providers competing for prime real estate. In one instance, a data center provider bought 55 homes only to demolish them to make room for its campus. Stream Data Centers, a Dallas-based provider of colocation and custom data-center construction services, last November purchased 55 homes in a 34-acresubdivision of Elk Grove Village, Illinois. According to published reports (here and here), Stream paid an average of $950,000 for each house.

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

"land grab"? That makes it sound like they did something illegal.

They offered people money and those chose to take it. Wisely. Because they made a huge profit on their houses.

You think I wouldn't sell mine for 950k when I bought at $310k?

[–] cron@feddit.org 2 points 4 days ago

True. At least the owners got a good price.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I'm surprised we don't have a story yet about a town of people weilding pitchforks and torches and breaking into a data center.

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world -1 points 4 days ago

Would you pissed if someone offered you double the value of your home? Wish would that happen to me.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 96 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] axexrx@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Need a third button, ruin society to be pressing.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 1 points 4 days ago

He's like every other CEO. Currently pressing it with his erection at the profits and suffering of poor people.

[–] Mauriciobravo@lemmy.world 22 points 5 days ago (2 children)

It’s wild to think that 'actually being useful' is considered a backup plan and not the starting point. Usually, you prove the value before you use all the resources, not the other way around.

[–] InputZero@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

The epitome of a solution looking for a problem. Microsoft and others have dropped almost trillions into AI. With nothing to show for it.

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

It is useful, if you have the freedom to use it when and how you want. Not when Microsoft says so.

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 53 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Wow, it turns out "Really convincing-sounding chatbot" isn't as all-purpose as was hoped.

I mean, legit, it's impressive how detailed and precise (and often wrong) it can get, but impressive isn't the same as useful.

I guess AI image generation probably has made concept art mockups quicker for some.

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Even using it for concept art is a bad idea in terms of creativity and the creative process and negatively impacts the end result.

[–] PineRune@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

An artist will have an easier time creating concept art than AI will have giving you an accurate representation of what you envision using keywords. If they turn to AI Slop instead for creative ideas, then the project they need concept art for never had a concept in the first place, and is doomed to fail.

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 2 points 4 days ago

An artist will have an easier time creating concept art

What about a writer?

I've never used it myself for such purposes, but I have a friend who generously uses AI image gen for his extensive constructed world, complete with a glossary and pages which link to each other. He doesn't have the artistic talent (or time) to make a sketch for every one of his ideas, but he finds they 'feel' more complete and sit more 'fully' in his mind with an AI gen pic for each one.

I've threatened him with bloody murder if he goes to a public release without commissioning real artwork, but as concept art and placeholders, I don't think AI gen is inherently illegitimate.

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world -3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

People who can't find any use for it are those who are determined to hate it at all costs.

Cooking and weight loss alone is worth $20 a month for me and that's just scratching the surface.

[–] nomy@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'm not sure an AI nutritionist in every kitchen is worth burning the environment/economy down.

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I am sure you're a hypocrite when it comes to energy expenditure. My footprint is probably smaller than yours.

Fuck me for improving in a way YOU don't approve, right?

[–] nomy@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 days ago

Is it an improvement though? You've just gotten rid of cookbooks and basic nutrition and are relying on a Chatbot that's going to lie to you eventually if it doesn't already.

Do you ever fact check it to make sure it's giving you good advice?

[–] IEatDaFeesh@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago

They've already lost social permission by making us hate their OS. This wording feels the same as calling lies "alternative facts." You just rename"hatred of our OS" with "lack of social permission." God PR speak is so annoying

[–] Emi@ani.social 24 points 5 days ago (2 children)

My GPU just started to die and I planned to build/upgrade my PC. Rip I guess all I can do now is hope for the bubble to burst.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 21 points 5 days ago

You can still get one that's 7 years old and was thrashed by the crypto Bros for 800 bucks though !

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

My RAM is starting to go on my 10 year old machine. I haven’t cried, but I wouldn’t describe the situation as dry, either.

[–] JustARegularNerd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I had the same thing yesterday - I had bought a 16GB DDR4 stick in the before times for my ThinkPad and now it's been behaving erratically and unpredictable. I'll run a memtest at some point, but it might be going back to its original 8GB for a long time..

[–] twack@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

DDR4 laptop RAM hasn't been hit quite as hard, a 16GB will set you back about $100-120

I had a squiz, so I had gotten a Samsung 2666MHz DDR4 16GB stick back in early October 2025 and it was AUD52.23

Looks like if I look around hard enough they're about AUD80-90 now, so while that's still a relatively large jump, it's not anything like the desktop memory has been.

I think even so, if my ThinkPad continues to have issues I'll live with the 8GB for now and wait out the price hike.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago

Today in "billionaire says the most blatantly evil and deranged shit ever publicly and no one cares"…

[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

lose 'social permission'

So when was that permission given?

[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago

This is your grave, Microsoft. Keep digging it.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

They could all lay themselves off

[–] Virtvirt588@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

It absolutely makes no sense that a bunch of corpos can do whatever the hell they like all while the common folk are forced to pay for their stupidity.

The electricity is one example. Bullshit like this which is completely useless shouldn't be a thing - All it does is severely impact the general populace all while the borguoise is blinded by false narratives whilst living beside their fat stacks of cash.

[–] TheProtagonist@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

They could produce something useful instead?!

[–] KingPorkChop@lemmy.ca 11 points 5 days ago

Bananapants.

Puts that in my pocket for later

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Microsoft committed too much too soon and now they're desperate.

[–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

They wrote a "Happy Birthday" sign with a big ass B, big ass I, big ass R... Oh, no!

[–] Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I see ai having 1 purpose

Help blind people

Image recognition is amazingly useful for blind people

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

There are a ton of useful use cases for machine learning, especially in the medical field. But the AI hype that all these datacenters are being built for isn't about molecule folding and interpreting x-rays, it's about chatbots.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 4 points 5 days ago

It's also good at assisting with software development, no thanks to Microsoft though when it's Google's Gemini model and Anthropic's Opus model used by copilot

[–] piranhaconda@mander.xyz 3 points 5 days ago

In a similar vein, machine learning is also being used to improve cochlear implants

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago

Banana pants for scale.

I think there are valuable, narrow use cases for AI as it currently is. It should not be released into the wild willy-nilly in some scheme by greedy, irresponsible billionaires to profit from. It should be strictly regulated and controlled, perhaps allowed only to researchers who are trained to use it responsibly. I imagine it would be useful for suggesting novel solutions to problems that people would eventually come up with on their own, but LLMs would present many more now for consideration. It could act as a hallucinating muse for people who understand its limitations and know the application well enough to know what to reject out of hand as wrong and irresponsible.

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

It is the grift du jour, so it was at the time

Any city council not restricting data center builds or not expanding renewables isn't paying attention or has been bribed

load more comments
view more: next ›