this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2026
224 points (99.6% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

68517 readers
367 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SnoringEarthworm@sh.itjust.works 133 points 2 months ago

I will always side against the multi-billion dollar corporation.

[–] mrsilkworm@piefed.social 73 points 2 months ago (3 children)

If you don't own what you pay for, then pirating is not unethical. Period.

[–] guy@piefed.social 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

This makes Anna's archive a bit problematic with that logic since when you pay for a paper you get a PDF copy?

[–] Arcka@midwest.social 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

These companies maintain that even though you possess a PDF, you still do not own it and do not have the rights associated with ownership.

[–] guy@piefed.social 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well no, but in the same spirit of how you don't own a movie just because you bought the DVD? I mean there are few things you actually own after buying them

[–] Arcka@midwest.social 3 points 2 months ago

I'm not sure what you're buying, but I prioritize purchases of things I will actually own and therefore do own most of the things I buy.

[–] Cenotaph@mander.xyz 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I would consider it more problematic if the author of the paper got any of that and not the journal the author had to pay to be published

[–] guy@piefed.social 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Not when the vast majority of music rights holders are not the artists. Then it becomes a far more apt comparison.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] breadguy@kbin.earth 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

what about when you rent something

[–] grey_maniac@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

When you rent something, you can share it. You rent a car, you can have passengers. You rent an apartment, you can have visitors. You rent a tool, you can lend it to your neighbour.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Then it's rent and not bought. That shitty excuse "akshualy you only bought the license, can't do what you want with it" is just abuse, because the buyer never gets clearly informed beforehand.

[–] breadguy@kbin.earth 2 points 2 months ago

if we're still talking about spotify it's pretty clear you are not actually purchasing all of music for $15

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 46 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Earlier, I wasn't convinced this was due to Spotify because it happened incredibly quickly after the news about the scraping. Two weeks or so after AA's announcement, I'd hardly believe this sort of domain takedown can be carried out so swiftly, without the pirated material even being available on the site yet. Guess I was wrong, Spotify money can do miracles.

[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 42 points 2 months ago

Funny how the same doesn't happen when X hosts CSAM though... Money truly can do miracles

[–] ChaosSpectre@lemmy.zip 33 points 2 months ago

Glad they can throw money at this, but still pay artists dogshit

[–] Fijxu@programming.dev 41 points 2 months ago

I stopped believing in DMCA/DRM/Copyright legality when big tech can use pirated content for their AI training and not pay a cent for it because the judge said "Is fair use" or whatever

[–] sopularity_fax@sopuli.xyz 28 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I feel like the whole Spotify thing was a misstep, I really dont know what to make of the whole thing

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 53 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They poked the Beast. I admire their moxy, and I hope they survive.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 8 points 2 months ago

It was a big ball move for sure, but they should probably get their domain name game good now that they're doing stuff like this

[–] altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It seems like overstretching the image of primarly-bookhunting piracy community. It could've been Anna's Playlist or something. Next we'd hear the FitGirl's name is Anya too.

Having a resource with a distinct field of interest and set of challenges, foes, arguments makes way more sense to me. In public perception, stealing a book and stealing a CD, or a movie are waslty different cases, and being book-first was their natural advantage in claiming the high horse in every discussion.

[–] sopularity_fax@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Like I dont get why they had to take credit for it. Like, fine, find an anonymous way to distribute and seed it initially, I just dont get why they felt like they needed to stamp their brand on it

[–] altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 months ago

I guess, besides stupid pride and challenging copyright fuckos, it also whitelists these uploads as coming from a reputable source, shows that's the community is alive and still kicking.

[–] brooke592@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago

Nah. It was great and we should see more of it.

Stop being afraid to fight because your enemies might fight back.

[–] protogen420@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

so how do I access it now?

[–] Cenotaph@mander.xyz 45 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Only the .org domain got seized. You can still use one of several backup domains:

While there, consider donating to help preserve the modern day Library of Alexandria!

[–] BoulderHole@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago

Thank goodness!

[–] atropa@piefed.social 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 22 points 2 months ago (19 children)

I never jumped on board with it. But people use it and it's news.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] slothrop@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I still use smoke signals to communicate afar.

[–] brooke592@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago

We need to move away from the DNS as quickly as possible.

It's just another tool of control.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 months ago
[–] themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)
load more comments
view more: next ›