this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2026
1089 points (98.9% liked)

AssholeDesign

10377 readers
1 users here now

This is a community for designs specifically crafted to make the experience worse for the user. This can be due to greed, apathy, laziness or just downright scumbaggery.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This cannot possibly hold up in court. You cant just advertise a product and then be like "*but actually we might be lying about some or all of these things"??? What the fuck are you selling then

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Susaga@sh.itjust.works 257 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Do not buy that laptop. If they cut corners on the fucking description, who knows what else they'll cut corners on.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 52 points 1 week ago (10 children)

I literally cannot think of the last time I saw a Samsung (or Sony for that matter) laptop in the wild.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 35 points 1 week ago (6 children)

How'd you know it was Samsung? Honestly I don't know if I've ever seen a Samsung laptop even through a screen

[–] Chronographs@lemmy.zip 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I think they’re assuming it’s a Samsung computer because it mentions phone link can connect to a Galaxy smartphone. Seeing as that’s the name of the program provided by Microsoft (which will connect to any smartphone) I’m assuming whatever ad copy this shitty llm ate to regurgitate this slop used a Galaxy phone as an example

[–] Davel23@fedia.io 18 points 1 week ago (5 children)

It specifically calls out Galaxy smartphones.

[–] L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Likely is, but not necessarily. Lot of scam listings just toss in "works with popular brand of thing" for ad space filler.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 101 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Send us $1300 and we will send you... something?

[–] Cattail@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago

Send a labubu

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Pavidus@lemmy.world 80 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I recently ran into this issue with a coffee pot. I was specifically hunting for a coffee pot with an adjustable temperature warmer. Ordered one that specifically stated that in the description, only to receive a coffee pot that did not have that feature. Checked the model number on the box versus the listing, and it's the same. Then I saw the fine print: we are not responsible for inaccurate product information.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 99 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They are absolutely responsible for that, fuck em

[–] Cevilia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 44 points 1 week ago

Too fucking right, send the fucker back

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 38 points 1 week ago

we are not responsible for inaccurate product information.

I have half a packet of mints in my car. Going to put them up on eBay and sell them as immortality drugs. Well see how that works out.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] j4k3@piefed.world 67 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Sales bs has been totally disconnected from actual specs for a long time. Like shopping for hardware a few years ago, I could not rely on any sales garbage for info. I only looked for verifiable model numbers and then looked them up on linux-hardware.org because those scans list everything the Linux kernel discovered.

[–] Cattail@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

I know as a reseller the sales stuff tends to be useless. Like it doesn't tell me every feature or how to use the device but for really old products it ends up being the last thing around

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 43 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Amazon’s “Starfish” project is scraping the net for small businesses and posting their products on Amazon, with AI generated information.

Imagine getting a sale from a storefront you didn’t consent to being listed on, with an inaccurate description of your product.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hdnsmbt@lemmy.world 43 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What's keeping them from checking the info before publishing it, though?

Oh, right. Greed.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] deltaspawn0040@lemmy.zip 37 points 1 week ago (2 children)

"windows 11" "smooth computing experience" yep that's AI alright.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Was just arguing about the usefulness of AI as a tool with someone on here, and he said that AI consistently making mistakes is a great way to improve critical thinking skills, because it challenges you to figure it out on your own after AI fails.

So what I'm saying is, that was an absolute rubbish take, and shit like this is going to be the downfall of the internet. The internet was such a wonderful, useful tool, and now look at how they massacred my boy 😞

[–] Shayeta@feddit.org 16 points 1 week ago

It went to shit when "the internet" became 4-6 biggest web services, this is just the final nail in coffin.

[–] PixelatedSaturn@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Brilliant 😂

It's the post truth world so many wanted.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kirk@startrek.website 29 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

I recently tried asking Amazon's AI a simple question about a product that had hundreds of reviews. It was a cheap thing, and I admit I was too lazy to verify the info so I went with what the AI said and bought it, and guess what the AI was just completely wrong and now Amazon is paying for me to ship it back.

[–] Suburbanl3g3nd@lemmings.world 23 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Lpt: don't buy shit on Amazon. Ever. Never. Never ever ever.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Denjin@feddit.uk 28 points 1 week ago (2 children)

There's almost as many words in the disclaimer than the generated description!

[–] Cattail@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Right idk why they don't copy/paste the description from manufacturer

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You cunts gotta get used to name and shaming instead of just posting and forgetting

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

bUt iF I NaMe tHeM ThEn tHaTs aDvErTiSiNg!!!

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If you can't give me exact, accurate details about your own fucking product, then I will not be buying your product. If it even actually exists, which I would now be doubtful of.

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They need to be held accountable for every single issue until they realize AI is not the way.

[–] orioler25@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (7 children)

I mean, this kind of missing why AI is so favoured by capitalists despite its obvious unsustainability. AI is already extremely overvaluated for a number of reasons, but its speculative ability to expand corporate ownership of consumer computing while eliminating/devaluing human labour created a potentially infinite vector of growth in a stagnating industry. Because all of these companies invested so heavily into this, largely in a scramble over intellectual property, they were able to realize numbers for this speculative value. Since immaterial financialization is the only kind of growth in a system that is so imcompatible with material reality, these companies have no other option but to adopt the technology, as to deny it would mean that they are not following a profitable vector of growth.

It's a very perfect situation to demonstrate exactly why capitalism is an unsustainable system. Infinite growth and profit imperatives literally makes it impossible to make effective decisions.

"Held accountable" doesn't mean anything wuthin this system, as the legal framework is designed to the interests of capital. They will not choose to stop because neoliberal politics and economic have constructed the state as a viable vector of revenue and risk absorption should any of these gambles fail (especially after the '08 recession).

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] percent 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

we strive to deliver accurate information

🤔 what do they think "strive" means?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Seasm0ke@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Online shopping just became gacha

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Truth in advertising was killed off in the 80's.. They can basically say whatever they want now and little ever gets done.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 0li0li@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

That's just illegal in many countries for a start

[–] Cattail@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Sucks that the US is outlawing ai regulation

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This isn't an AI regulation thing.

It could say this was made by a marketing fuckboy and it'd be the same.

This is a consumer protection thing...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kn0wmad1c@programming.dev 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Do they know what "strive" means?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Widdershins@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I've got a bridge to sell. It's about yay high and goes all the way across. It is colored #9aae07.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Sorry, that color is copyrighted by Pantone, please cease and desist.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rolive@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 1 week ago

LLMs are a disease.

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I'm like 95% sure a 360 degree hinge isn't even possible, without the thing connected to that hinge being paper thin.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago

Technically they're not a single 360° hinge. They're actually two 180° hinges that are very close to each other with a short link. I've got one right here.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] hector@lemmy.today 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I do not get it, how much effort would a product description possibly be to instead use ai? This is not a one off, even before these llm ai systems a lot of instruction manuals in cheap crap you buy were written by machines, very badly.

They are presumably paying people to be executives and board members and managers, but they can't be bothered to pay someone a few hours to write a product description accurately? We have all the wrong people in charge in this country. Because they can not even write an accurate product description they chose to.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 14 points 1 week ago

Looks like you didn't just save 450, you saved a full 1300 by not buying it from them

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I hope somebody sues them for an unreasonable amount of money, and then wins even more - enough to get the attention of other companies that are considering this.

Laziness/overenthusiastic cost cutting is NOT an excuse for false advertising.

[–] Cattail@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Companies really need to stop expecting an ever growing amount of profit and just accept making enough to live off of

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 11 points 1 week ago

SO many problems would go away if people stopped being greedy assholes. Since this problem was created by greedy assholes, the best way to get their attention is, ironically, by suing them for a staggering amount of money (which could be misconstrued as greed).

The idea that a company could sell anything while giving out inaccurate information about the product up-front strikes me as utterly bizarre and unimaginable. at least in germany that would be considered "fraud" and definitely you'd have a right to get your money back.

[–] bytesonbike@discuss.online 14 points 1 week ago

Name and shame. Send the link so we can blast this bullshit.

[–] Alpha71@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In case anyone was wondering, it's Best Buy

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Eh, nothing new. For the past few years I’ve had to shop though manufacturer spec pages anyway.

Retailers know most shoppers aren’t careful, though.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›