Yeah, I debated whether I should include it but tbh I think it would've lost its shitpost-factor and turned into political slop. I decided it was more a IYKYK situation.

That being said I appreciate it being added in the comments.

It’s got to be satire. Beautiful women have never stopped being in ads. Why make this comment for this specific post if it’s not satire.

Edit:

Richard Hanania (born August 28, 1985) is an American political scientist and right-wing online personality.[3][4] He is the founder and president of the think tank Center for the Study of Partisanship and Ideology (CSPI).[5][6][7] He has written for The Washington Post,[3] The New York Times, The Atlantic,[6] and The Economist.[4][6] He wrote The Origins of Woke and publishes his newsletter on Substack.

Oh

Knowing absolutely nothing about the model... My first thought was that she was trans. Because the dipshits run into that all the time.

They make no effort to actually understand anything and just live off vibes and beliefs with no factual basis whatsoever. Not doing a basic Google search to look up the model and verify before posting like an idiot is par for the course.

definitely needed that context

I don't know if the post is real, but I want someone to point it out to the guy.

Edit: I've browsed this guy's account. The post is supposed to be sarcastic.

This is why many of them hate trans and or gays, they are attracted then realize it. Maybe still are attracted after knowing.

Clearly their influencers are using them as a scapegoat of sorts. Otherizing them in bad faith anyway idk what you could call that not scagegoating perhaps.

Given that the poster has his own Wikipedia page… I’m going with dumbass?

Isn't she the one who wanted to be cast as Princess Zelda that a surprising number of terminally online folks were super angry about because trans?

This... This is too stupid why am I laughing so hard

I need a vacation

I quite enjoy how those who are pro senseless lewdness in advertising are often the same people who want women to cover up.

Let's take a look at plus-size models. That's a really good example.

It makes this rift between haas/body acceptance and what's really actually healthy.

But on the flip side, super-skinny models aren't exactly healthy, either.

Both normalize unhealthy weight and lead to population-wide body image problems and related eating disorders. Then you get things like social media throwing rocket fuel on that fire.

I don't see how either is "woke" though.

I'm almost certain they're talking about the model's weight, and that having plus sized models is "woke"

@lemmy.blahaj.zone

Checks out

... I was going to ask what this person is smoking, but I'm guessing its meth.

Worse. It's OANN

The higher-end the product, the more malnourished and not-happy the model must look.

Only models for low priced products can eat and smile.

That's why they hate the yearly Pornhub report.

IIRC there's a pattern of greater interest in trans porn in all red states.