this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2026
579 points (99.2% liked)

politics

28220 readers
2095 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://archive.is/2OdeD

Attorney General Pam Bondi was so furious with six federal prosecutors who announced they would resign rather than prosecute the widow of a Minnesota woman killed by an ICE agent that she fired them before they had a chance to give their notice.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 166 points 1 month ago (10 children)

They should have just not said anything dragged their feet while at work while slowly eating up annual/sick leave to really slow everything down. Now there are 4 vacancies that could have been tied up for the better part of a year.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 103 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Bingo. Drag your feet, use up time. File shitty motions you know won't work to tie up the courts. Sabotage is hard work, but slowing the gears of the Orphan Crushing Machine is important and actually pretty easy to do when it's the federal government.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nocteb@feddit.org 88 points 1 month ago (6 children)

It's better strategically but you need to have the strength to do so. Sometimes people are overwhelmed by something and just need to get out of the situation and I think that is OK too. Everyone should do what they are capable off, but it should be fine to just stop doing wrong stuff.

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 25 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Exactly. It's easy to tell people what they should be doing, from the outside.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 month ago

even moronic lawyers betting on trump over the constitution have to know there's no way that bloated sack of animated cholesterol is going to make it to 2028, and then where are they? working for couchfucker?

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 18 points 1 month ago

They aren't going to be able to fill these because fed attorney jobs pay dick and there is zero prestige to these postings now.

[–] CainTheLongshot@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (3 children)

We also dont know the situation that led up to them resigning and getting fired. They very well could have been trying to drag their feet but were already under immense pressure to file charges immediately. No amount of feet dragging can help if the Nazis are literally hovering over you as you fill out the paperwork.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 month ago

I agree with "don't quit, impede" philosophy, but a very public show of support against these fascist actions is not something to dismiss.

Some people just don't want to eat shit for a living.

[–] EtherWhack@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Weren't these the people earlier this week who supposedly resigned, of which people were complaining about. Now it comes out they were actually fired before they even could...

Maybe people should realize there might have been more going on that we aren't privy to.

All this 'not good enough' thinking does is breed toxicity and in-fighting. Both of which are not good when trying to form a solidarity.

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

Weren’t these the people earlier this week who supposedly resigned, of which people were complaining about. Now it comes out they were actually fired before they even could…

The prosecutors announced their intent to resign, and would have done so after using up their allocated PTO. A fairly standard practice in professional environments. Pam Bondi fired them in retaliation for announcing their intent to resign

She claimed it was because they wanted a tax payer funded vacation, but anyone who understands the basics of unemployment, especially in Minnesota, can tell you she just gave them even more tax payer money (if they want it). Not only will they be entitled to their PTO, but they are now also entitled to unemployment

Edit: Fixed typo

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

not everyone seeks "lowering the bar" transgressions for feels

these people want to change the world not troll their boss

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 101 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

What? They want to prosecute the widow? What for? Fucking monsters.

Can they sue for wrongful termination or something?

[–] ajoebyanyothername@lemmy.world 51 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm sure I read some suggestion of charging her with felony murder; as in she committed a felony (anyone's guess what that would even be) and as a result her wife got shot, which somehow makes it her fault.

[–] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Who is that?

Damn hes got a great hairline

[–] rainwall@piefed.social 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

A reporter that asked trump some easy, direct questions during his first term and got substained crazy back. His expressions have been memed.

[–] irq0 11 points 1 month ago

HBO reporter that interviewed Trump a few years back

Be warned, it's extremely painful to watch: https://youtu.be/NmrEfQG6pIg

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 47 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The need to dehumanize the victim because even some Republicans are upset that they are shooting white ladies.

[–] Soulphite@reddthat.com 23 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Yeah but they'll let it slide because she was LGBTQ... /s

[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

This, but not sarcastic.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

"After a brief investigation over mimosas and a cheese platter, we have found credible evidence that Good was a member of the Alphabet Mafia. The agent was justified in his use of lethal force against a dangerous criminal. No charges will be filed."

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

It’s true but it’s getting close to where they are beginning to feel uncomfortable about it. Not quite unhappy yet but they’re getting there.

[–] duckCityComplex@lemmy.world 60 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm not surprised that Hannity finds it "almost impossible to comprehend" that someone would resign to uphold their principles.

[–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Both of these talking heads are puppets with the hands of the same puppeteer up their asses.

FOX news needs to be destroyed. Preferably with everyone still inside.

[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

I had the chance to give the staff diarrhea but I felt bad for people like the camera operator or whatever... I worked for a company involved with Dairy Queen and Carvel ice cream and at the start of the "ice cream season" fox does a morning show with them as a advertisement. I was so close to putting exlax in the mix but I decided against it... I still kick myself for not doing it but it wouldn't have reached assholes like Hannity anyway.

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 59 points 1 month ago (1 children)

As a Minnesotan, I've had a lot of conversations with friends, family, and neighbors lately about what is going on

Most are pissed about ICE being here, and how they're acting. Some, however, are 100% MAGA, and happy ICE is here

There is one thing everyone seems to agree on though: ICE being in Minnesota is political retaliation

We're a state with ~2% of the population of the US. We have less than 2% of the immigrants due to our location and climate. Yet 20-30% of ICE agents are now here

[–] eddanja@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you're not MAGA, you're an immigrant.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fishos@lemmy.world 53 points 1 month ago

Dumb of her. You have more protections when fired than if you just quit. It's almost always in your best interest to have a shitty boss fire you and have those protections than leave voluntarily and have almost none.

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 50 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

She was:

Murdered!

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 37 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Damn Pam. Ok,you broke up with them. Not the other way around. We got it.

Somebody literally needs to remind this lady to stop and take a breath before she passes out mid rant.

[–] Xbeam@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

Or maybe we get lucky and she has a stroke.

[–] IckabodKobain@feddit.online 31 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

Correct me if I am wrong here: Are there women in ICE? All I have seen are men who look like they are divorced and not paying their child support.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago

A quick search brings up stats from 10 years ago, and at that time about 7% were women.

No idea what the number is now, but I've seen recent information (news reports, vlogs, etc.) mentioning, and showing women in ICE uniforms.

I believe there are women in ICE, which isn't surprising, but not very many.

Just yesterday, we had the story of a female journalist who claims she was admitted to ICE with no vetting. So, they at least allow women to enter.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago

The fact that these monsters would even think of going after the victim's wife tells you all you need to know about the conservative mind.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

I so want to see her on the stand at some point. Under oath, and not in an environment controlled by conservatives, either.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Man who would think a corrupt AF soulless scumbag like her would do such a thing.

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

It wasn't her intention, but she did effectively help those prosecutors

She handed them a bulletproof unemployment claim. Now they'll get their PTO paid out in a lump sum, but they'll also be eligible for unemployment on top of it

Minnesota unemployment decisions are very favorable to workers

[–] Scottyc65@reddthat.com 12 points 1 month ago

You can't quit! I fired you first! LOL

[–] hesh@quokk.au 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

She calls them the "deep state" lol

[–] radio@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Policy failure? Deep state. Polls down? Deep state. Your revenge prosecutions are getting thrown out of court? Deep state. The few people in the DOJ that have a teeny bit of integrity quitting? Believe it or not, deep state.

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 11 points 4 weeks ago

Daily reminder that ICE is a manufactured distraction from the Epstein Files.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 8 points 1 month ago

Suck it Nazi Barbie.

[–] Taco2112@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

More posturing to look like they’re taking charge. I don’t know if any of what I’m about to say is true but if those attorneys already had the accrued PTO, they will get their pay for that time anyway, at least that’s how it’s worked anywhere else I’ve worked in the US. Also, if they can prove that the firing was retaliatory, they may be able to get further compensation and payouts.

Like I said, I know nothing of their employment/contracts so I could be talking out of my ass, but if what I said is true then the government is paying more money than they would be if they just let the prosecutors resign. I could be wrong once benefits are included.

Overall, my theory lines up with yours. They knew thr simple minds at the top would fire them, and somehow that benefits them. They are lawyers after all, and getting hired into the jobs they had makes it very likely they were at least savvy in political maneuvers.

[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago

She is trying to save her job.

load more comments
view more: next ›