this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2026
11 points (66.7% liked)

No Stupid Questions

45367 readers
741 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Retro_unlimited@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago
[–] Teh@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Uh… where exactly? There’s not a lot of land that isn’t claimed by someone already and unless you’re willing to hold whatever new nation you’re trying to form by force, you’ll have a hard time. Trying to do that in the middle of the Gobi Dessert probably only requires a few million in weapons, but water is gonna be hard to come by. Trying it inside the USA is gonna be pretty tough. I’ll suggest buying an island for a couple billion, spend another couple billion on infrastructure and then just a kinda lay-low government, where you don’t officially claim independence, but also don’t really follow the laws you don’t like (see Epstein island for more details).

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

A lot of micronations were formed in the micronational head of state's property, so as long as you have your own property to claim as a micronation, then you're good.

[–] Teh@sh.itjust.works 2 points 13 hours ago

Again I ask… where exactly? Inside the USA your micro nation is going to have to either follow all the laws of the local, regional and national governments, or be prepared to defend it by force.

[–] fort_burp@feddit.nl 3 points 1 day ago

Yes. Power's biggest fear is irrelevance. That's why power in distress is so violent- it's forcing it's relevance into a place where it doesn't provide anything and is not needed or wanted. At this point all the institutions in the US are a hindrance to the people and the people can manage much better without them.

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 4 points 1 day ago

Yes, and it will need a militia to protect itself, and a Declaration of Independence. You should focus on distributing food and arms to the people and constructing a leadership apparatus for your new nation.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The FBI calls those cults, usually with cause.

[–] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

Frankly, at the point we're already at, this time around the cause would be "We don't like competition".

[–] deafboy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Some say it's useless to overthrow a government, because the first thing people do after is create another government. It's highly unusual to skip the first step, though.

[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

If by "government" you mean "autonomous anarchist community" and by "micronation" you mean "freely associated federated network of autonomous communities" and by "United States" you mean "the stolen land occupied by the AmeriKKKan settler-colonial project", then yes.

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean a micronation like Molossia or Austenasia

[–] remon@ani.social 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Only if you want to be raided by federal agents.

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What if you form that micronation under a very very different name that DOESN'T in any way say America?

They don’t care what you call it, they’ll kill you anyway. Violence is typically the only way for any nation to get new land, and nobody is currently more equipped for violence than the US Government.

[–] remon@ani.social 4 points 1 day ago

Is it on American soil? If so, the name is irrelevant.

[–] CombatWombatEsq@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

I don’t fly the Cascadia flag for nothing. Cascadia now!

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why "alternative government"?

This current "government" is illegitimate and we should redo the 2024 election and swear-in the rightful government of the people then remove these traitors that are illegally occupying Capitol Hill

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

How are we gonna convince the government to recount all the votes in the 2024 election? Should we use force? NOT fedposting, just asking.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Why would you even try to convince an illegitimate gonverment to do something?

Like if the confederates took over DC, do you send them a nice letter?

Its illegitimate, and people who sworn an oath to the constitution should really try to take back control and restore constitutional order. As in the way the Union dealt with the confederates. The Union held an election during the civil war, they simply just don't count the electors from the rebel states, so we just do the same right now. Pro-constitution states should get together, hold federal elections in those states, and declare those elected officials to be the real United States government.

Edit: Legal disclaimer, this is hypothetically speaking of course, I do not condone violence

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What about the current Trump administration?

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He's just another Jefferson Davis

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Then should we form an alternative government as a micronation?

[–] Nemo@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago

I don't think she meant "micro", no.

[–] Nemo@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is someone just discovering anarchism?

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

I mean a micronation like Molossia or Austenasia. I support micronations.

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

No, but as a whole nation.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think you're asking about secession, and at what point that becomes necessary?

Texas threatens this every decade or so. The problem is that any individual states outside of New York and California would not be able to subsist. These two states because they have massive economies and are coastal, others because they are landlocked between.

The first order of business down this road is finding legal ways to stop the flow of money from these states to the federal government and starving them, which will invariably destroy the country as a whole.

It's complicated.

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don't mean secession - I mean like a micronation like Molossia or Austenasia, for example

[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I mean both of these micronations do claim to have seceded from the nations that surround them. And unless you're thinking of starting a micronation in one of the few remaining terrae nullius, i.e. land so shit that no one wants it, secession is a necessary part of building a new nation.

IMO nationalism is a way for weirdos to roleplay as important people and isn't really a serious solution for anything. Micronations are just a pitiful facsimile of that. Like even people who like states see micronations as not worth recognizing.

Any state would have to secede first.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Just tell the AI to pretend he's a benevolent ruler and do what he says.