this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2026
202 points (98.6% liked)

news

380 readers
902 users here now

A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.

Rules:

  1. Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
  2. Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
  3. Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
  4. Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
  5. No link shorteners
  6. No entire article in the post body

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BotsRuinedEverything@lemmy.world 2 points 24 minutes ago

Oh I'm sure we'll get him this time. Yup all those other times he dodged responsibility for his actions were just practice. This will truly be the moment of reckoning.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 5 points 6 hours ago

schumer and hakeem will give a strongly worded letter, when thier AIPAC masters tell them too.

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 hours ago

I have zero faith in Dems at this point, so, yea.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 17 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

"Could be"? Are they setting the stage for yet another example of when Democrats have the power to do something beneficial...they simply decide not to?

[–] resin85@lemmy.ca 7 points 12 hours ago

Their messaging needs to be simple and clear.... Trump and his cabinet are breaking the law, and must be impeached.

[–] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 63 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

why is stealing in scare quotes? that's literally what he's factually objectively demonstrably fucking obviously doing

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 19 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

While the media are generally cowardly if not outright fawning towards Trump, in this case I think the quotes are not intended to be scare quotes. This is a standard journalistic way of indicating in the headline that this is a direct quote, not a paraphrase, of what he said.

[–] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 3 points 16 hours ago

makes sense

[–] asteriskeverything@lemmy.world 8 points 11 hours ago

Impeached??? Omg! Not again! How ever would they survive? Unprecedented

[–] SillyMe@piefed.social 30 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

hell his Greenland threats alone are grounds for impeachment. fuck all this.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 6 hours ago

anything to distract from said EPSTEINFILESTHATMAKETRUMPLOOKDEVIANTANDANYOTHERRICHPERSON.

[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 15 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

As an outside observer - does impeaching do anything? I thought he'd got two of those under his belt already and it made no difference.

Impeachment is done in the House of Representatives and is similar to an indictment. After the House impeaches a government official a trial is held in the Senate. A conviction requires a two thirds vote in the Senate. If convicted the official is removed from office and may be barred from holding future office.

Trump has been impeached twice but neither trial has resulted in the 67 votes required for conviction in the Senate.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

You have to impeach in order to remove from office. So far impeachment hasn't led to that, but it could.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 6 hours ago

the gop will never remove one of thier own office, they may virtue signalling by doing it in the house, but they made deals ahead of time knowing the senate will not convict.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

it could

It absolutely couldn't. Best estimates show dems gaining a couple seats in the midterms, and conviction requires 2/3 of the senate. There's no way 15+ of the GQP are gonna suddenly not be fascist bootlickers.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

They're talking about the parliamentary process, not the political reality.

[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 1 points 5 hours ago

I was asking about the political reality.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 1 points 13 hours ago

The House has the power to impeach him...but only the Senate has the power to remove him. All the other times Democrats had control of the House, while Republicans controlled the Senate.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 26 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

A bit misleading, to have the power to remove Trump requires 67 Senate votes which means removing every single Republican up for reelection and losing no seats or otherwise convincing those Republicans to remove Trump.

Even then, the line of succession will go to Christofascist Vance.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Voice of reason.

He commits impeachable offenses LITERALLY every single day. Just impeaching him with no consequences is a waste of effort, and it's not like Vance is going to be a picnic. Besides, Id rather leave Trump in and watch him make the MAGA candidates dance in 2028, teasing them about staying in or getting out, etc. He'll have lots to say, and they'll be afraid to cross him, etc. It's going to be entertaining.

If Vance is in, it gives him a chance to normalize MAGA, and make them viable for 2028.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 12 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

vance can then be impeached if he does not follow the law.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 9 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Will he be impeached before or after he's excommunicated?

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 5 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

EDIT: I was wrong, he's Catholic, he should be excommed


Evangelicals don't believe in excommunication, their churches don't have central authorities which is why so many of them turn into money grubbing scams like televangelists with mega-churches.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 2 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

And then you'll have the equally loathsome Mike Johnson. It's scumbags all the way down with that mob.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Vance will have chosen Thiel as his vice before then.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 1 points 12 hours ago

I reckon Thiel is probably pretty content where he is, running things behind the scenes.

The VP has to be confirmed by the Senate if appointed after the election. A Senate that would convict Trump wouldn't confirm Thiel.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 13 hours ago

following the law which includes the constitution should be the standard regardless. then it goes all the way down.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

if trump gets impeached then theoretically congress should be functioning again and enforcing the constitution and law on the executive.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 1 points 10 hours ago

I feel like Vance for all his aspirations cannot be compared to an elderly serial rapist pedophile who dodged the draft and tore down a wing of the whitehouse.

[–] NorthoftheBorder@lemmy.ca 6 points 15 hours ago

“Could be”? Wtf. Dems need a spine. Or be replaced with someone who does.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Democrats promised this in 2020 and didn't follow through. Get a new lie.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca -1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Democrats didn't control the Senate all those other times.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Stop making excuses. The caucus had a majority from 2020 to 2022.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Republicans controlled the Senate in 2020...and after that, Biden was president until 2024.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Yes, and during the time democrats had a majority, they did fucking nothing to bring him to justice.

To hear you talk about it, you'd think there is no such thing as a democratic majority ever.

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 15 hours ago

Block him and stall his efforts. Public hearings.