this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2026
91 points (96.0% liked)

Europe

8419 readers
1940 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archived version

Shortly before Christmas, the new chief of [Secret Intelligence Service ] MI6, Blaise Metreweli, made her first public speech since taking charge. She chose as her subject the multifaceted threat posed by Russia, warning of the growing danger from Vladimir Putin’s regime. “We are operating in a space between peace and war,” she said.

...

The picture Metreweli paints is frightening: a scenario not of overt military strikes, but of covert “grey zone” assaults from every angle. The spy chief did not go into detail. We are all aware of the existence of planned sabotage, assassinations, hacking, cyber crime and drone attacks. Such concepts are well aired and are firmly embedded in the public consciousness. Less familiar, however, according to security experts, is the notion of economic warfare. Key to this, to use their parlance, are non-state actors – not Russian diplomats or entities formally associated with the Russian state, but private individuals, organisations, movements and companies who secretly act in Russia’s interest.

Some are ideologically motivated, while others do it for money, frequently being paid in untraceable cryptocurrency, like Jan Marsalek. Austrian-born Marsalek was COO of Wirecard, the German payment processing firm that collapsed in 2020 after announcing that €1.9bn (£1.65bn) it supposedly held in cash did not in fact exist.

...

For almost a decade prior to its insolvency, Marsalek had been working for the Russian security agency, the GRU. His position at Wirecard gave him access to data and resources that were useful to the Russians. He used his seniority to develop pro-Russian links in Libya, and to encourage a flood of migration to Europe that was calculated to cause social and financial damage – all playing into Moscow’s hands.

After his exposure, following Wirecard’s collapse, Marsalek fled to Russia. In late 2023, Marsalek was named again as the coordinator of a Bulgarian spy ring operating in the UK.

Another example is petty criminal Dylan Earl, the ringleader in an arson attack on a warehouse in east London stocked with aid for Ukraine in March 2024. He was also recruited online by the Russian paramilitary organisation known as the Wagner Group.

...

Harder to crack are the Russians or non-Russians working in the commercial field, in strategic industries critical to Europe’s defence and infrastructure, such as defence and energy, and acting in Russia’s interests, often under orders from the GRU or other Kremlin agencies. Security sources maintain that Moscow considers these actors useful as there is a degree of separation: deniability is fundamental to the strategy.

...

The difficulty of tracking such activity can be seen in the case of Alexander Kirzhnev. The Russian is wanted by the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court in Ukraine, having been accused in absentia of organising a fraud against Ukraine by using a bogus US company to fulfil an order for ammunition.

The Ukraine state-owned firm Artem placed a multimillion-dollar order for 152mm and 155mm shells with a supplier based in Florida. Advance payment was made. All seemed well: a US firm was helping Ukraine’s war effort, no problem there. The trouble was, the Florida company had no ability to fulfil the order.

By diverting precious Ukrainian cash, taking up their time and effort, and making them think much-needed military supplies were coming when they were not, Kirzhnev’s alleged actions – whether under instruction or not – epitomise Russia’s goals in the “grey zone”: deniable private-sector activity that moves the Kremlin closer to its strategic objectives, sowing uncertainty along the way.

...

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tomiant@piefed.social 8 points 7 hours ago

I can't prove it but I have a strong suspicion that the arson attack in Germany last week on their power infrastructure was the Russians, pretending to be far left extremists, killing many birds with one stone; damaging Germany's energy infra, evaluating responses, and further polarizing the left right divide as per their old MO and goals as stated by Alexander Dugin.

They were caught doing this exact same thing dozens of times now all across Europe, among other terrorist attacks.

I think they've been responsible for far more sinister types of terrorism as well these past 20 years, but they really picked up steam after they invaded Ukraine the second time.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 8 hours ago

You mean a Cold War? Like we've been having since WWII?

Yeah, we know that. America thought it was over when the Iron Curtain fell in 1989, and stopped, but Russia never quit. This isn't new, these Dumb Apes either paid or forced some kid to do their homework in private school, and never cracked a history book in their lives. They are profoundly, virtuosically ignorant.

[–] rayyy@piefed.social 15 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

These folks may not have noticed but Russia has been at war with the US for a long time utilizing social media and other cyber avenues and they have been successful beyond their wildest dreams.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Whenever I try raising awareness about kremlin psyops, people make cliché tinfoil hat jokes.

Like, this isn't some bonkers conspiracy theory. It's real, it's well-funded and organized, and it's been going on for a long time...

[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 5 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

I remember a few years back there was a power outage where one of the major GRU op centers was, and so many Twitter and reddit accounts were dark for half a day when they would normally be active as hell. Some guy actually made a traffic graph with a bunch of the accounts, that really opened my eyes to how extreme it is.

Brexit, Canadian Truckers, MAGA, they amplified all of it to success.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 hours ago

Fuck the GRU. Sometimes I imagine what the world could be like without their manipulation, and it's sad to realize how much the trajectory of history and of human sociocultural evolution has been influenced and shaped by these evil, nefarious, bad actors.

Literally so many problems we have today (the brainwashing and radicalization of the masses, the extreme polarization and divisive rhetoric) can be placed on their shoulders, and they have complete plausible deniability.

[–] Supervisor194@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago

Too true but I think their success, their actual success - as measured by desirable outcomes for Russia and the world it creates for itself to exist in - is far from certain.

Russian leadership has this bizarre sense of manifest destiny, an unflagging idea that destabilizing the dogshit out of everything everywhere (the "success" you refer to - because yeah, they're killing it) somehow can only lead to good outcomes for Russia and not the reverse. That's far from certain. Shit, if history is anything to go by, it's strangely arrogant hubris.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

encourage a flood of migration to Europe that was calculated to cause social and financial damage

Using the aversion of migrants to maintain aversion of Russia is cheap. From the origin of the Libyan instability to the magnitute of the Russian share, that point sounds constructed. This questions the support for refugees and validates the parties that have questioned it since the beginning.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Misinformed take. Lukashenko is known to have channeled migrants through Belarus to Central and Western Europe, on russia's behalf, with the deliberate goal of destabilizing Europe.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belarus%E2%80%93European_Union_border_crisis

And it's working. How many right-wing populist nutjobs have used the crisis to gain traction for their pro-russia parties?

Many people in Europe, even on the left, acknowledge that an uncontrolled influx of migrants is having a range of detrimental effects. The difference is some people want sensible solutions, and others want to paint with a broad brush while making rabid accusations.

It's entirely possible to still support refugees while also stymying the flow of a hostile power's weaponization of displaced people. Dismissing the problem altogether doesn't do anything but help reactionaries who paint themselves as the only ones willing to address the issue.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 1 hour ago

I couldn't find a number for the refugees in the article. How many are approaching the border? I don't doubt Russian influence but the magnitude.

More than a million refugees came from Syria to Germany. If several thousand have crossed the border in the east then that's not causing mentionable social and financial damage. Instead mentioning 'social damage' from Libyan refugees is almost open racism.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Why are these migrants leaving their countries I wonder.

[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Often it's the long tail of colonialism in the form of ethnic disputes and displacement, disenfranchisement, or more modern geopolitics. Sometimes it is just plain remote control capitalism that has kept a region poor for low wages. Simple imperialism exists still, too. All of that leaves its natural offspring, corruption, and war.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

It's a bit more complicated than that. It's tempting to fixate on a simplification with one culprit to blame, but causality is rarely linear.

For instance, many Syrian refugees were fleeing Assad's brutal regime before it was toppled; Assad was being propped up by Iran. Afghan refugees were fleeing the Taliban. And while yes, there are historical factors that contributed to Assad, Khameni, and the Taliban being in power, and the West certainly doesn't have squeaky clean hands in those historical factors, it's not entirely the West's fault, either.

If you want to trace the origins of conflict back to the beginning, there's always one step further that you need to take in order to understand the set of circumstances that contributed to the particular tensions at play that gave rise to each conflict throughout history. Ultimately, there's been conflict in the region (and arguably all regions) since the dawn of civilization, and likely earlier too.

That's not a justification for colonialism, but let's not act like we would have world peace if only Europeans had decided to stay in Europe. A lot (not all) of what we call European colonialism in the Middle East began at the conclusion of WWI. There was no longer an Ottoman Empire, and after nearly five centuries of stability the region was suddenly thrust into a period of change and the potential for chaos. The victors had the responsibility to oversee a transition to a new system of governance. A lot of the results were less than ideal, but hindsight is 20/20. We can't say we would have made better decisions if we were in their shoes, limited to the knowledge that they had available to them at the time. Anyway, it's not like the Ottomans had been some egalitarian society that respected all people equally; even they had clearly defined hierarchies that were based on race and religion.

Most of the post-WWII involvement of the west in the Middle East was to combat the influence of the Soviet Union, which wouldn't have been any better. If Europe and the US had simply pulled out of the region, there would still have been a major colonialist/imperialist power in the Middle East, destabilizing civilizations and propping up puppet governments, perpetuating cycles of conflict and fueling the rise of armed militant groups, all resulting in mass displacements of people.

All in all, ethnic disputes have existed since the beginning of time, and while European colonialism may have exacerbated certain of these by placing their thumb on the scales for a period of time before suddenly removing it, let's not pretend it would all be sunshine and rainbows if they hadn't, either.

That doesn't justify conflict by any means. We should all strive for a world in which we can put away the conflicts of the past and move forward in an age of peace and cooperation. This herculean task would require us to have a comprehensive understanding of the origins of each conflict in the first place, and almost all of them go much further back than a cursory glance at 20th century history can reveal.

So I think it's also important to focus on the progress that societies have made, and acknowledge their contributions to the peace process as well.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 1 hour ago

there would still have been a major colonialist/imperialist power in the Middle East, destabilizing civilizations and propping up puppet governments,

Is the USSR a colonial power? At least the intention for spreading Socialism should be the opposite. Would the USSR extract resources in the same way?

We can’t say we would have made better decisions if we were in their shoes, limited to the knowledge that they had available to them at the time.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sykes%E2%80%93Picot_Agreement

The agreement is frequently cited as having created "artificial" borders in the Middle East, "without any regard to ethnic or sectarian characteristics, [which] has resulted in endless conflict."[116] The extent to which Sykes–Picot actually shaped the borders of the modern Middle East is disputed.

That would be the best interpretation. It's more likely that it was done with regard to ethnic or sectarian characteristics,

[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago

While this is a fine and much more detailed response, I don’t appreciate you mischaracterizing my comment as fixated on a simplification with one culprit, when I explicitly provide 4 or 5 examples of causes, use modifiers like often and sometimes, and don’t specifically mention a region or group of migrants, as it is obviously a generalized introduction to the issue.

So much more exposition than comprehension or engagement. Carries the whiff of overeagerness to establish an agenda.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 hours ago

Aside from political instability and endemic violence, poverty, and lack of social mobility; there's also climate change to blame for making equatorial regions increasingly inhospitable and/or uninhabitable...

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 2 points 16 hours ago

Europe: "First time?"