this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2026
88 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

7788 readers
342 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

While the United States drives away its brightest minds, China is doubling down on its investment in research, positioning itself at the forefront of an industrial transformation

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 13 hours ago

Don't worry, US citizens will let it.

USAID, dead. IRS, gutted. FBI & DHS, nazified. The list goes on into the hundreds maybe thousands.

If US citizens changed things today, it would still be decades upon decades before one could even get back to square one.

It sucks, but at this point I think China taking over as the world's super power might be net better in the short term.

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 7 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

A generation? No. All future generations.

[–] diabetic_porcupine@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago

The venn diagram's circle of 'no' in inside that of 'all'.

[–] ProfThadBach@lemmy.world 12 points 15 hours ago

Oh he has done grabbed us by the pussy.

[–] grober_Unfug@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 16 hours ago

Not only would it cost America a generation, each country, each area under the American influence will suffer the same.