this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2026
358 points (99.4% liked)

politics

27087 readers
2974 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 1 points 29 minutes ago

IDK, there have been a lot of dumb wars. I don't think that's a competition worth grading though.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago

Really shouldn't have used a superlative, now Orangeman will want another subtitle.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Never underestimate the power of large groups of dumb people doing very dumb things.

The redcaps are not a majority, but they got Donvict into office and Donvict probably has something like the Sarah Palin Floor for support - somewhere in the high 20s percent to low 30s percent, I'd wager. That's millions of very stupid people that are cheerleading dumb things.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Falklands on notice

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

And Trump is known for doing the dumbest thing possible in almost every situation, so ....fuuuuuuuck.

[–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 15 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I agree it would be the dumbest war in history. And there was a war over a bucket.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

True. At least in that one the Bolognese didn't already have the bucket.

[–] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 53 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

I don't think this dude realises that he is talking about the dumbest president in American history, but then again he did get into the White House TWICE, so i'm not really sure who's stupider? him or those that put him there and are STILL rooting for him...

[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 14 points 12 hours ago

I think he might be the dumbest world leader in history, honestly.

Like, there have been some real morons throughout the world, but this guy really takes the idiot cake.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 27 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

It shows you how rigged the voting system is in favor of the Republicans for the presidential election. They have rejected the illusion of democracy at this point let alone the practice.

They have gerrymandered, used religion, the courts, infiltrated voting systems, and not mention constant propaganda with a heavy reliance on othering people to ensure they win even when their numbers are less.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Republicans and the voters that voted Trump are definitely the stupider part of that situation. Being fooled by a fool makes you pretty stupid. Failing to detect the blatant lies of a pathological liar makes you stupid. Thinking the obvious flaming sociopathic narcissist is on your side makes you stupid.
The only way to be that stupid is by a lifetime of indoctrination that up is down. Americans have been indoctrinated for a century that freedom is the ultimate highest value, higher than life itself, without ever actually making a good definition of what freedom is! And Trump is a sociopathic narcissist, with no conscience no respect for anything or regard for other people and little self control, and that is seen by most of the American population as the ultimate expression of the freedom they idolize.
Americans are also indoctrinated to admire being rich, as a sign of skill and intelligence. And since Trump is rich and famous, Americans think he is intelligent, despite his fortune is based on his inheritance.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 9 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

The Americans will gain absolutely nothing that they don’t already have.

Not true. They'll gain the thing that they actually want, possible mineral and oil fields, even though nobody is asking for it. Trump sees dollar signs, even though as per usual it's terrible business, but he has a military to enforce his wants so we're all fucked

Trump is a mobster wannabe if mobsters were just terribly dumb

Even the oil companies don't want Venezuela, yet he invaded it for them anyway

[–] amorangi@lemmy.nz 1 points 34 minutes ago

Anyone can get a mining license in Greenland right now. The reason they don't is that it's difficult to mine there.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

They already have access to mineral and oil rights in Greenland. This is literally just about the words on the map, just like Gulf of Mexico.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

And we have a military base there, too.

I think someone wrote some gaslighty DARVO piece in The Atlantic taking this "reasonable" position about how we "had" to acquire Greenland at any cost.

I still don't understand how any of their reasons are real reasons, other than Donvict wanting to feel like his tiny peen is yooooge and still works.

[–] paranoia@feddit.dk 7 points 9 hours ago

US companies can apply for mineral extraction in Greenland if they want, there is nothing stopping them. Greenland would be quite happy for the tax.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

Also he probably looks at a Mercator projection map and thinks New Trumpistan would be just YUGE. Trump the great they will call him in his own imagining of history.

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

This Danish dude needs to wake up.

Trump will absolutely move forward with the "Dumbest War".

Bitch, it's coming!

[–] Boiglenoight@lemmy.world 38 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

An attack on Greenland would trigger Article 5. An attack on one is an attack on all. It would start a world war.

Trump said that electing Kamala would lead to world war 3. Every accusation is an admission.

[–] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

I think the EU would capitulate. They know they can't fight the US. But it would likely be the end of NATO.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 13 points 12 hours ago

There are options. Dumping US bonds would collapse the US, and the only thing that makes it hard is the US economy collapsing would be a bad thing for the EU right now.

Also, protracted resistance. Greenland is harsh territory, and Nordic weekend soldiers regularly beat US marines in exercises in cold weather warfare.

The USSR lost half a million in Afghanistan, 50k to fighting, 450k to the environment. And they didn't need to resupply via the Atlantic.

Also, the Nordics probs have the world's best submarine interdiction fleet, and most of the Cold War era US anti-sub stuff is actually reliant on Greenland, Iceland and the UK cooperating.

Nordic subs regularly score hits on US carriers in exercises.

[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It would be the end of NATO as it stands, there's no reason the remaining countries couldn't continue the alliance or start a new one.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

Would technically have to be a new one, NATO wasn't designed to handle this sort of scenario. Of course New NATO would be an America-free roughly equivalent, with some different governance to prevent things like a single county impeding something everyone else wants.

[–] Rhoeri@piefed.world 38 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

Considering that Trump will go down in history as politics’ dumbest fucking member, it’s not a stretch.

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 9 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

I mean it was ronald reagon up to this point but trump well being trumped is going to have a whole new meaning after this.

[–] Therefore@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (5 children)

There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me - you can't get fooled again.

[–] moakley@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago

That wasn't even stupidity. He just realized partway through the sentence that he didn't want there to be an audio clip of him saying "shame on me." So he tried to change it and made it so much worse.

If anything this makes him more relatable.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] atropa@piefed.social 5 points 16 hours ago

You forgot ,pedo ,scammer and murdere

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 67 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

The Dumbest <thing> In History is Trump's bag, baby. It's his home territory. An enduring legacy he has painstakingly built over decades. It's a tall bar to clear, but I think Trump can top the Emu War.

I can't predict anything this administration does, but it seems very possible we attack on MLK day.

[–] ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world 10 points 18 hours ago (5 children)

but it seems very possible we attack on MLK day.

I'd be curious to hear your reasoning for this.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 21 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

I think he'd love to rename it after himself somehow. And if they did an instant takeover, that would be Trump's "V-Day."

I wouldn't bet money on it, but if I had to, that's the day I'd pick. They are ramping up the rhetoric more than they ever did for Venezuela.

I think his birthday is coming up. That is a strong contender as well. "Happy Birthday, Mr. President. We got you Greenland."

"Wow, no one has ever gotten me one of those before. Can I do the whole Prime Nocturn thing with the Danish gals?"

That might be a better bet, even.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 hours ago

He’d call it T-day for sure.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MummifiedClient5000@feddit.dk 42 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Dumbest war in history so far.

[–] ClownStatue@piefed.social 1 points 5 hours ago

Came here for this!

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

I feel like this one would have some staying power...

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 11 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Idk, invading the wrong country for 20 years was also pretty dumb. Maybe not for american standards, but for every developed country.

[–] logi@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

That wasn't Bush being dumb, though. That was Chaney and the gang taking advantage of the American prople being immensely dumb.

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 1 points 47 minutes ago

the American prople being immensely dumb

hah

load more comments
view more: next ›