My two cents is that more users oughta establish new communities when they find the absence of one. Even if they don't have the time to devote for moderating it, as people join the responsibilities can be allocated among the early adopters. Especially those with strong political and moral backgrounds (to mitigate abuses of power like those infamously cultivated over at Reddit).
this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2026
791 points (97.9% liked)
Fediverse
38804 readers
1653 users here now
A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, Mbin, etc).
If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!
Rules
- Posts must be on topic.
- Be respectful of others.
- Cite the sources used for graphs and other statistics.
- Follow the general Lemmy.world rules.
Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I agree! There is not enough people here
Goes to 'All --> New,' here we go again...
Come on everyone, let's do our part. The only way to get less doom and gloom on the main page is to engage with the stuff you want early. Like it was mentioned by others, that primarily means comments not just upvotes
load more comments
(2 replies)
Tell your musician friends to find me here:
https://lemmy.world/c/IndepthIndie
Actually, you know what? I'll give a free guitar lesson to the first 10 people to make a post in that group.
aw damn i'm a commenter more than a poster. I could use a good resource on theory beyond the circle of fifths though i'm a total novice.
load more comments
(3 replies)
I'm doing my part. I can't stop making communities and having debates.
To the user mines!
I actually don't mind a smaller community of more intelligent people. Too much riff raff and the quality degrades.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Alright, I'll make more content. Give me a month or two. I'm slow at drawing.
This is quite concerning indeed.
We should start by being better at retaining what we already have.
Every person is valuable now.
load more comments
(9 replies)
I've been here a few years now and I can say Lemmy's got issues. You can't come on here and have a good time anymore when all it's about is trump trump trump and Linux Linux Linux it gets old. I wanna escape from reality a bit sometimes and there's few areas to subscribe to that gives any joy anymore.
On a long enough timeline, every Lemmy thread eventually becomes one of the following:
-
ACAB
-
Trump bad
-
FOSS good
-
Reddit bad
-
Socialism (generally, via vanguard party) good
-
Tankies (i.e. #5) bad
Not that I disagree with most of the above, but we need some normies in here to balance things out, so invite them and don't demonize them. That's made trickier by Reddit banning people for talking about the Fediverse/Lemmy, so you have to be clever about it.
Yeah part of the issue here is that there are so few users that the more niche topics just don't get a lot of traction.
For example, I help mod the Washington Capitals hockey team community, but mostly it's just two of us talking. We recently decided to stop posting game day threads for every game, because there'd be one comment in them (usually me), if we were lucky - and we were the last NHL team community to end the game day threads; most stopped long ago. The overhead just wasn't worth the reward. We decided we'd focus more on the general Hockey community, hoping to build that out a bit.
(We didn't give up entirely - we posted a sticky thread that is for all games, and we'll make a top level comment for each game in there, asking people to respond to that comment for that game. If they don't, not a major issue. This way we still have the forum for the game discussions without having to worry about posting it every time.)
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(18 replies)
Just wait for Reddit to finally ban porn and we’ll have more users than we know what to do with
load more comments
(4 replies)