this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2026
426 points (91.9% liked)

Microblog Memes

10088 readers
1285 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A lot of replies here (obviously from people not already aware of The Discourse on this point) were genuinely confused variants on "But why, they're right, that's a valid concern." Let me leave a short thread for future readers explaining why that stuff is always unwelcome on here. (1/n)

It's totally understandable if you're dooming about any facet of the American experiment right now. So your feelings are "valid" in the sense that they represent real anxiety, and I get that. But to vent that anxiety in other people's spaces is wrong for three reasons.

First, it's factually wrong. There will be elections in 2026 and 2028 under Trump, just like there were elections last year under Trump and during his first term. This despite one of the two major parties now harboring a lot of anti-democratic elements and ideas.

I'm not particularly interested in convincing anyone on this point and won't try, the future is the future. But if the left side of the political spectrum is still the domain of scholarship and expertise, take note that you don't find scholars and experts you worrying about canceled US elections.

Second, and probably most importantly, it's tactically wrong. "No point discussing political opposition to fascism, there won't be elections anyway" cedes victory to your enemies. It's defeatism and nihilism.

Finally, it's wrong AS A MATTER OF ETIQUETTE. Entering a total stranger's discussion and leading with your private anxiety is as off-putting in social media replies as it would be in real life. If you wouldn't interrupt a stranger at a party to announce that America is doomed, don't do it here.

If you are anxious and sad about the state of the world, that's fine, and there are plenty of strategies for dealing with that. But I think you already know that drive-by online dooming isn't a strategy. It's selfish and adolescent. It's a contagion that only spreads the worst of you, not the best.

Take a second and think before posting the easy Eeyore reply. You might have something substantive to say instead. Or, even better, you can say nothing at all.

https://bsky.app/profile/kenjennings.bsky.social/post/3mbuedepurs2x

(page 3) 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Triumph@fedia.io 7 points 1 day ago

There will be no midterms. Notice how every single fucking day for years has been "I cannot believe this is happening", and that the breadth and depth of that is only increasing?

This horrible chapter in human history will close, for the better, like every other horrible chapter in human history: with a lot of bloodshed. Should there be political opposition to fascism? Of course. Will that be enough to turn the page? Absolutely not.

[–] Rubisco@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's a typo in the title, Null. And thanks for the post. Agreed.

[–] negativenull@piefed.world 2 points 1 day ago

Thank you, fixed

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I find it helps to ask what is the intention. If it is to just unload negative feelings and there is no effort to build something after dumping those emotions, then the intention is to dissipate energy. IMHO it is better to hold those emotions and unpack them in a space where the energy can be harnessed into something more useful than venting. Even a rage room is healthier and more productive for instance.

[–] sudo@programming.dev -4 points 1 day ago (28 children)

First, it’s factually wrong. There will be elections in 2026 and 2028 under Trump

This should really be the only point that needs to be made. You can say the elections will be fraudulent or a sham but you can also say they've been that way for a long time. Its just a shallow and juvenile understanding of the situation.

[–] phx@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

They have been, they will be too, but I'll also say it's gotten a lot more blatant over time. Jan6 should have been the moment where people really woke up

It'll be even more blatant as the next election comes closer, assuming they don't pull the "martial law no election" shit which seems to be the current aim.

[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Tell me what you think would happen, for instance in Texas, if Trump issued an executive order saying "election is suspended"?

Are you certain that there wouldn't be any states that would go along with this? The election can't happen if the states don't participate, and if only some do, then you are entering into an unprecedented situation which potential gives Dumbtits the ability to make precedent.

load more comments (26 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›