this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2026
663 points (99.0% liked)

News

34088 readers
2293 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A leading Catholic paper has branded JD Vance a “moral stain” and accused the vice president of having a “twisted and wrongheaded view of Christianity” for his comments on a woman killed by ICE.

Renee Good, a 37-year-old mother, was shot three times in her car by a federal officer carrying out immigration raids on Jan. 7. Vance, 41, who identifies as Catholic, has since joined the government’s push to brand Good a “domestic terrorist” who tried to run the officer over, calling her death “a tragedy of her own making.”

In a blistering op-ed column on Thursday, the National Catholic Reporter accused Vance of “justifying” Good’s killing, saying his comments are “a moral stain on the collective witness of our Catholic faith.”

The outlet’s digital editor John Grosso wrote: “In times past, a politician might offer thoughts and prayers, encourage those reacting to wait for the full results of the investigation and generally try to lower the temperature. A leader might take the opportunity provided by a fresh day to soothe the broken heart of a nation.“

But, Grosso added, “JD Vance went in a different direction.”

Good, 37, a U.S. citizen, was killed when an ICE officer fired into her SUV on a residential street in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Multiple videos show agents shouting conflicting orders at her before one officer moved toward the driver’s door and another stood in front of the vehicle and opened fire as it rolled forward.

The Trump administration quickly framed the killing as an “act of domestic terrorism,” with Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem alleging that Good had “weaponized her vehicle” and Trump claiming she “violently, willfully, and viciously ran over the ICE Officer.” Local officials who reviewed the footage, including Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, have called that version of events “garbage.”

Undeterred, Vance went even further. In posts on X and in a White House briefing, he argued that Good’s death was “a tragedy of her own making” and that she was part of “a broader left-wing network to attack” ICE officers.

In response, Grosso wrote: “As a Catholic, Vance knows better than to peddle this brand of gaslighting and agitation. Vance knows that only God can take life. Vance knows that protesting, fleeing or even interfering in an ICE investigation (which there is no evidence that Good did) does not carry a death sentence. Vance knows that lying and killing are sins.

But, Grosso added, “He doesn’t care. Vance’s twisted and wrongheaded view of Christianity has been repudiated by two popes.”

Suggesting that Vance’s Catholicism “seems to be little more than a political prop, a tool only for his career ambitions and desire for power,” Grosso said: “The vice president’s comments justifying the death of Renee Good are a moral stain on the collective witness of our Catholic faith. His repeated attempts to blame Good for her own death are fundamentally incompatible with the Gospel. Our only recourse is to pray for his conversion of heart.”

The critique is part of the latest episode in the long-running tension between Vance and the Vatican over the Trump administration’s hardline immigration crackdown. In 2025, Pope Francis skipped an official meeting with Vance at the Vatican, sending Secretary of State Cardinal Pietro Parolin instead to deliver a lecture on compassion and migrant rights, before granting the vice president only a brief Easter greeting the next day.

Francis’ final months were marked by increasingly sharp rebukes of Trump-era mass deportations, which he called a “disgrace” and “not Christian,” and by a behind-closed-doors dressing-down of Vance over the White House’s treatment of migrants shortly before the pontiff died at 88.

His successor, Pope Leo XIV, 69, has also seemed to distance himself from the Trump immigration agenda. When Vance led the U.S. delegation to Leo’s inaugural Mass in Rome last year, the new pope greeted him briefly in public but held private meetings that day with Ukraine’s president and Peru’s president instead.

A longer sit-down with Vance followed a day later, but the Vatican’s statement on it emphasized humanitarian concerns and “current international issues,” which was interpreted as a subtle signal of disagreement.

Outside Rome, Catholic criticism of the administration’s immigration campaign has intensified. An essay on the Letters From Leo website this week declared that Trump’s renewed crackdown—“championed by our nominally Catholic Vice President JD Vance”—has “inflicted mounting inhumanity,” and said the policies have drawn “scathing rebukes from two popes and the vast majority of bishops.”

The Daily Beast has contacted Vance’s office for comment.

top 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] neuromorph@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

He did kill a pope.... have we forgotten that?

[–] merdaverse@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As a Catholic, Vance knows better than to peddle this brand of gaslighting and agitation

I really fucking doubt he does. Being Christian is just an aesthetic for these people. I kind of hope their God is real, just so they can burn in hell.

[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

He's claiming to be Catholic, though, not just a garden-variety American Christian (which could be anything, really). This article seems to ask why he even calls himself specifically Catholic if he's going to espouse these views and engage in this kind of behavior. I see two major possibilities:

  • he doesn't know what Catholicism is, and is just pretending to be Catholic for political favor
  • he does know what Catholicism is, and is trying to fuck with it

All modern presidents/VPs have claimed to be "Christian" -- it's basically an unofficial job requirement at this point. So why not just generically claim to be Christian (like Trump does). Instead he claims to be Catholic, but clearly is not lol. So something is not being said.

[–] phx@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

A lot of Catholics seem to consider themselves the "uber-Christians", with the whole Pope thing being their religious king, such as it were.

And the ones like that are absolutely terrible at actually following the lessons of their religion too. Now they've got a new "king" so I guess the Pope doesn't matter as much

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They should bring back excommunication just for him.

[–] LordCrom@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Excommunication is still a thing.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

When was the last time somebody was excommunicated? Did they deserve it as much as he does?

[–] LordCrom@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's not everyday you get an opportunity to have your name put on a wikipedia page with people from the 1st century...

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Also for a while being excommunicated could earn you a painting, which is kind of neat, but was probably less neat if you got burned at the stake. Unless you really had being painted as a goal.

Well Vance is a literal heretic from my admittedly shallow understanding of Catholic doctrine so... Probably not. It's pretty hard to be worse than a literal heretic.

[–] AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world 128 points 2 days ago (1 children)

JD Vance is so unlikeable that it killed Pope Francis.

Never forget.

The only reason trump can survive it on a daily basis is because his dementia is so advanced that his brain is effectively mayonnaise and cannot recognize what is happening in the world around him.

This administration must really despise the 1st amendment.

[–] kgillies272@feddit.online 50 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He should be excommunicated.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We should start an excommunication petition

[–] AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago
[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 76 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Still not as big of a stain as the one he left on Erika Kirk's couch last night!

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 39 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 days ago

Those weren't tearstains.

We Catholics take a lot of well earned crap for a lot of people for a lot of things we did over the millennia.

But people often forget that a not insignificant percentage of Saints became saints being murdered for standing up to the church for the dumb shit they were pushing.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

"JD" "Vance", Taco, the Republicans, and the entire conservative movement are a skidmark on this country.

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Punchable face.

[–] FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world 40 points 2 days ago

I saw the video of Vance berating Good and fanning the flames of the fire. The way he speaks appears strong to people who can't think for themselves, and who lack their own moral compass. Truly a nation of weak, heartless automotons we've found ourselves amongst.

[–] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 40 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Shocker, the man that murdered the Pope isn't a very good Christian. Who'd have guessed?

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 24 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Seriously will never be convinced he didn't play some part in his death (and not just by being such an awful person it made the pope decide it was time to peace out and go home).

[–] Plurrbear@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Couch fucker can’t even get the church on his side… embarrassing. He should just go back to fucking couches and Kirk’s widow! Oh I forgot… buying eyeliner at Walgreens! Hahaha! Douche!

[–] OldQWERTYbastard@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Vance should have began and ended as a cum stain. The same goes for mango mussolini.

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 31 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

JD Vance has no chance.

Shit stained soul and shit stained pants.

“The vice president’s comments justifying the death of Renee Good are a moral stain on the collective witness of our Catholic faith. His repeated attempts to blame Good for her own death are fundamentally incompatible with the Gospel.

How appropriate JD Vance would attempt to make such a shitty legal and moral argument. I wonder who God would side with in the case of Good vs Evil.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Considering there hasnt been a rain of brimstone, or assholes turning to pillars of salt, or anything else of the sort.. Suggests that, if a god so did exist, he absolutely does not care about their actions at the very best.

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I mean to each their own, but if you do believe in a God, you might also view this through the lens of most historical and religious texts being full of very similar stories. Seemingly undefeatable evil and oppressive rulers and empires, reigning supreme over large numbers of people for generations until the day they just suddenly didn't.

For me personally, it has actually kind of rekindled and helped me better understand my own faith, and I've stumbled across numerous passages in the bible that almost seem to be warning about this exact scenario. False prophets, hypocrisy, and men who use their positions of power and influence to spread a false message in the name of Jesus to deceive oppressed people, keep them from resisting oppression, and gaslight them into believing their oppression is a necessary part of God's larger plan. As if the oppressors were actually chosen by God to commit these horrific acts, and anyone who isn't loyal to their leadership somehow also isn't being loyal to God.

That dumbass Pete Hegseth actually recently quoted one of those warnings (Matthew 10:34) in an attempt to claim his thirst for destruction and violence is simply a manifestation of Jesus acting through him to spread his message... Except, he missed the entire point of the passage he quoted by about a million fucking miles.

When Jesus says he brings a message of the sword not one of peace, he's using a metaphor to describe the divisiveness of the message (the sword) he preached. When you read the entire passage in context, then try to depict Jesus as a violent warrior with a sword ready to go to war, you're literally arguing that Jesus was telling people to kill anyone that disagrees with them including their own parents... If that doesn't sound like something Jesus would say, it's because he definitely wasn't trying to say that. Like many parts of the Bible and other ancient texts, it was obviously a figure of speech. He was explaining that the true message of Christianity can often be a divisive one, even for the people you consider your closest friends and family.

"The sword Jesus brings is not here military conflict, but, as vv. 35–36 show, a sharp social division which even severs the closest family ties. … Jesus speaks here, as in the preceding and following verses, more of a division in men’s personal response to him."

When we hear this blasphemous messages this administration is spreading, like the idea of "toxic empathy," as a justification for tearing immigrant families apart by kidnapping, detaining, and often deporting them to places they fled while seeking asylum, just to flaunt their disregard for human life. Actively protecting wealthy pedophiles and rapists from justice, while publicly celebrating the attack and invasion of smaller and weaker sovereign country to kidnap a dictator and his wife, and put them on trial in the U.S., while the administration is continuing to violate habeas corpus for millions who have been detained in immigration sweeps in the U.S. Seizure of what resources that smaller country does have simply to make some of the most wealthy American corporations even more wealthy by giving them a larger share of the huge profits they were already making, yet still refusing to provide healthcare, housing, and other basic needs to Americans citizens. Now they're literally trying to justify the murder of a mother who made the fatal mistake of being in the wrong place at the wrong time, and not bowing before the mighty army of the King when they invaded her home while welding their "absolute immunity" (not to mention the monetization of all of these fucked up messages and policies via constant exploitation of a religion they seem to care nothing about). We quite literally (not metaphorically) are all collectively witnessing how hard a pill to swallow Christianity actually is for the people who profit in his name while openly refusing to respect or follow the word of Christ.

Sorry for beating a dead horse, but these cowardly fascists hiding behind Christianity to spread their hate gets me a bit riled up. Even if you didn't grow up from birth to 18 immersed in the often dark and hypocritical world of southern evangelical Christianity, (then come out the other side very jaded only to realize that in spite of everything they tried to brainwash you into believing, your faith was never lost, it was what was guiding you to resist the whole time), you probably still understand that Jesus would be fucking pissed and flipping tables if he caught a glimpse of One America or Fox News right now, just like anyone with a shred of decency and critical thinking skills should be.

The passage Hegseth chose to quote as "secretary of war," is actually particularly relevant when it comes to contrasting the hypocrisy of the Christian Nationalist movement with what Jesus actually says in the same book (The Greatest Commandment Matthew 22:35-40), are the 2 most important commandments to remember and follow even if you take away nothing else from the Bible (practicing empathy and loving your neighbor as a sign of your own love and respect for God and his creations).

Tldr: Hegseth quoted what he thought sounded like a badass hypermasc message of Jesus advocating war, not realizing he's actually who Jesus was trying to warn you about in the passage.

[–] regedit@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

First I thought, wouldn't it be Good vs. Ross? Then I realized you didn't mean to refer to her last name in this case. I kind of like the thought of using her last name to play up the comparison, regardless!

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

Good vs Johnathan "Evil" Ross. I assume the E in his name is for evil*.

*What is the actual middle name? If anyone researches this fucker, it would be good to know.

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You can't be apart of the Trump administration and not have moral failings. They even make you prove from time to time.

Moral failings would imply they have any morals to live up to in the first place.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Moral stain? More like a shit stain.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The writer says "Vance knows that only God can take life."

That means that God took the victim's life, not the ICE officer.

Such a goofy religion. Fortunately, it's TAX FREE, so we all can pay for it! Yay!

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This is America. Everything is tax free if you're wealthy enough.

You get all kinds of breaks on taxes, interest, random fees, and other costs as a reward for already having money. Because why would you give a break to somebody who actually needs it?

If there's any chance you could conceivably use a tax break or extra income to potentially improve your standard of living, these fascist try to convince you it would be taking away your dignity to not pick you up by your ankles, turn your pockets inside out, and shake you until they've made sure they've gotten every fucking penny.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Our only recourse is to pray for his conversion of heart.”

Thoughts and prayers.

What does it profit, my brethren, if someone says he has faith but does not have works? Can faith save him? If a brother or sister is naked and destitute of daily food, and one of you says to them, “Depart in peace, be warmed and filled,” but you do not give them the things which are needed for the body, what does itprofit? Thus also faith by itself, if it does not have works, is dead.

Talk is cheap. Walk the walk.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Gotta try hard to out-shitstain the Catholic Church. JD might manage it, but it'll be an uphill battle.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Certainly is responsible for a lot of upholstery stains

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They took until now to notice what he is? My goodness, don't they have eyes and ears in the US?

[–] gnutrino@programming.dev 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Well no, as the article says he's already been admonished by two popes but if he's going to keep doing heinous stuff while claiming to be catholic they've sort of got to keep calling him out.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Time for excommunication

[–] ol_capt_joe@piefed.ee 0 points 2 days ago

That'll teach him (that he can keep spitting in their faces). How many cheeks can you turn?

[–] MagnificentSteiner@lemmy.zip -2 points 2 days ago

Virtue signalling. If it's in their interest the Catholic church would fall in line in the blink of an eye.