this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2026
372 points (99.7% liked)

World News

55217 readers
2452 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Conflict around possible American seizure of Greenland island only intensifies further. However, this doesn't prevent issuing permits for selling Denmark weaponry, such as AGM-114R Hellfire II missiles and associated equipment for $45 million.

According to a published U.S. State Department permit document, Danes want to purchase up to one hundred missiles, three stationary test missiles, six M299 launchers, two MHU-191/M transport trailers, and three BRU-14 holders. This will also include logistics, support services, spare parts, technical documentation, and software.

The sale is stated to help advance American geopolitical interests and improve NATO security. This is very interesting considering the surrounding political situation around Greenland island, which supposedly needs to be surrendered for White House needs.

Worth noting here: so far most threats sound only verbally, without special practical changes in U.S. policy. Meanwhile, Denmark remains a long-time ally, so there is no need to refuse it weapons sales.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lettruthout@lemmy.world 84 points 2 months ago (2 children)

What did Michael Moore say, something like…. “Capitalists will sell you the rope to hang them with.“

[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] regedit@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 months ago

Doesn't matter. Let's do it!

[–] Magnum 4 points 2 months ago

Same guy for americans

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago

... very angry rope.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 60 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Arming your "enemy' immediately before attacking them seems like a very stupid idea. So par for the course with this administration.

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 58 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Denmark shouldn't trust anything that comes from Trump, I know I don't

[–] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Weapons production is private sector. And if there is anything the MIC isn’t known for it’s selling bogus weapons (after all such a thing tends to piss off clients present and possible future.)

[–] regedit@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The US has some of the most dud-prone weapons of any military, at least they did when I was in. A lot of our bombs have multiple safety mechanisms that, if any fail, may fail to fully initiate the ordinance. They still fuck stuff up, though. A 2K bomb falling at that rate and height will still ruin someone's day.

Source: prior ammunition specialist with USAF

[–] 0x0 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

A lot of our bombs have multiple safety mechanisms that, if any fail, may fail to fully initiate the ordinance

And thank god for that considering how many nukes the US have managed to misplace without finding them again

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 44 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Chinese stuff with hidden off switch 😱

American stuff with hidden off switch 🤑

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

DE added a bit towards the end of the article explaining that (in their opinion ofc).

Worth noting here: so far most threats sound only verbally, without special practical changes in U.S. policy. Meanwhile, Denmark remains a long-time ally, so there is no need to refuse it weapons sales.

[–] possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

DE is Germany, DK is Denmark

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

DE is Defense Express, the source of the article.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 43 points 2 months ago (2 children)

As a Dane, I'm appalled and disgusted by my awful government continuing to financially support fascism even in the face of open hostility 🤬

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (19 children)

There is currently no European alternative to this or some other US missile systems. Though France has a program to create an alternative (MAST-F) by 2029 which I'm sure will be very popular among European weapons purchasers.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

I guess the bright side is that's 100 less missiles the US has... Seems like a poor tradeoff to funding their empire though

[–] Throbbing_banjo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 2 months ago

"The last capitalist will sell us the rope we hang him with" energy

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 25 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This should read "Denmark will give $45M to the Greenland invasion fund".

Seriously, it's like Europe wants US to humiliate it. Is this part of some master plan? Give them so much money and power that they will overload?

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 10 points 2 months ago (3 children)

If they want missles for their aircraft there currently is no alternative. I'd rather they have the missles they need to shoot down US aircraft than any concern about the US having $50m which is a rounding error in their budget.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SoloCritical@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Y’all are wild if you think each and every one of those can’t just be killswitched whenever the US feels it’s convenient to do so. They don’t like your target? Whoops, that’s a dud.

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

43m sounds like one missile.

[–] hexdream@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

Because money.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There are probably ways to disable them if used against USA intentions.

If not, stupidity is a feature of fascism and the inbreeding inherant in racial superiority ponzi schemes.

More like. It doesn't matter. A few hell fire missiles are not making any meaningful difference in a fight between the usa and Denmark, so you might as well sell them to hedge your bets if you decide not to invade

[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's gunna be funny as fuck when they launch right back at the US because trump tries to invade.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Not so much when they turn around mid-flight and obliterate Denmark.

[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

You are vastly over estimating the destructive power of a hellfire if you think they can obliterate a country.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 6 points 2 months ago

maybe if it has a spoonful of antimatter.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Well, it really depends on how many Denmark bought, and what the targets are.

[–] halferect@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

45 million would probably be 250-300 missiles

[–] abcdqfr@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] Tja@programming.dev 3 points 2 months ago

Not the article for sure, because the article mentions "up to a hundred". But reading articles is for losers, it's much cooler to make stuff up.

[–] halferect@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

They cost between 130000-160000 each and I'm kinda just rough estimate because I don't know the exacts of the deal

[–] Tja@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago

Gee, I wonder if we could find this kind of information, maybe by interpreting letters into sounds and ideas...

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

The world's biggest arms dealer is dealing arms?

I'd guess the software has some kind of kill switch, but I'm not a missile engineer

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 8 points 2 months ago

!nottheonion

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Does no one understand that bullys are cowards?

[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Denmark right now...

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 5 points 2 months ago

Yeah, we're crazy like that. Just like how we arrest the leader of one country for being a drug dealer, only 2 months after pardoning the convicted drug dealer ex-leader of another country, serving decades in prison.

load more comments
view more: next ›