this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2026
475 points (99.6% liked)

politics

27087 readers
2974 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Amberskin@europe.pub 7 points 12 hours ago

They are going to be primaried, right

RIGHT?

[–] FahrenheitGhost@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago

Traitors! Bought and paid for by Citizens United.

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 1 day ago (2 children)

With Democrats like these it doesn't take a genius to wonder why 1/3rd of the US didn't show up to vote.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago

We’ve never had a government that put the needs of the people ahead of the wants of the rich. The closest we had was FDR, and even he only pushed the New Deal to stop us from demanding an even better deal.

[–] Ach@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Are you under the impression 1/3 of Americans made academic decisions to protest poor candidates by not voting?

1/3 of Americans didn't vote because they're uneducated, lazy slobs. Stop fooling yourself.

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Why are you complicating things? Whos taking about academia? If people don't see candidates that inspire them they stay home. This is pretty basic. The uneducated lazy slobs came out in droves for Trump whos vote share kept increasing, so why is it the uneducated slobs that dont like Trump didnt? Don't fool yourself thinking all the slobs stayed home but also managed to vote for Trump. One group was inspired by the hate, and one group was uninspired by the lack of resistance.

[–] Ach@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

So you truly believe that 1/3 of American voters didn't vote in protest?

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 29 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Who needs the diet version of fascists?

[–] notwhoyouthink@lemmy.zip 1 points 12 hours ago

WE. WILL. NEVER. GO. BACK.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 day ago

Those that refuse to admit that is what they are

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 33 points 1 day ago

Useless fucking losers

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago

The midterms won’t save us. Pitchforks will.

[–] jenings@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I just don’t see how anyone can hear this and see them as effective leadership. Minority party or not. Like it makes me, a dedicated left wing person, not want to support democrats because they seem to have lost the plot

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago

They haven’t lost the plot, they like the plot. They don’t agree with you, they don’t like you, they don’t want to help you.

[–] OshagHennessey@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Completely agree. There are no US politicians who are willing to offer social progress or even support middle-class workers. If you're not a campaign donor, you can't get shit in this country.

Not that it matters who votes for who. After the 2024 election, it's obvious the winner isn't decided by votes anyway.

[–] notwhoyouthink@lemmy.zip 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

It doesn’t help that most of them are so old and rich they’re completely detached from the realities of the people they’re SUPPOSED to represent and serve.

Many of them either have never been anything other than at least upper class, or their time spent below upper class is decades away and very very irrelevant compared to those of us who are not, especially during this time.

They do NOT represent us. How the hell can anyone expect them to serve us?

[–] OshagHennessey@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

"Democrats agree with fascism and wont oppose it."

Tell us something we don't know.

[–] Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yet people get mad when you say both parties are working together.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Not so much working together but definitely share the same masters.

[–] Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip 1 points 12 hours ago

But that's "bOtH sIdEs" thinking!!! Don't you know even just saying that means you hate humanity?!?!?!

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago

PRIMARY ALL OF THE FUCKING DEMOCRATS!!!

Unless they are actively opposing this regime, they are complicit. Full stop. Some worse than others, but just replacing Schumer won't do shit if the rest of the Democrats in Congress are the same milk toast centrist corporate assholes.

[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 148 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Dont listen to their words, only watch their actions. By actions alone, these 2 are MAGA.

[–] Goretantath@lemmy.world 51 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Yup, they are republican plants.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] human@slrpnk.net 137 points 2 days ago (5 children)

“We’ll figure out the accountability mechanisms at the appropriate time,” Jeffries told reporters.

Didn't realize this was an inappropriate time to try to stop them from kidnapping and murdering people.

[–] notwhoyouthink@lemmy.zip 4 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

“We’ll figure out the accountability mechanisms at the appropriate time,” Jeffries told reporters.

This reeks of post school shooting rhetoric, ‘now is not the time to discuss gun law’ in the immediate aftermath of mass child slaughter.

The appropriate time was years and years ago, or at the very latest January 20, 2017.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago

“We’ll figure out the accountability mechanisms at the appropriate time,” Jeffries told reporters.

Counterpoint: no you fucking won't

“We’ll figure out the accountability mechanisms at the appropriate time,”

That would be Flight of the Pigs O'Clock.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 40 points 2 days ago (9 children)

Primary these worthless fucks

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Someone needs to run against him in order to be primaried.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Yes. And I'm calling for that to happen.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 day ago

No need to wait. The elected Democrats can vote them out of their leadership positions now.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] leadore@lemmy.world 55 points 2 days ago (1 children)

New York 8 you know what to do -- primary Jeffries. Start looking for your candidate now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] devolution@lemmy.world 66 points 2 days ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 39 points 2 days ago

They will not go against the wishes of their donors. They do not represent their voters.

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 36 points 2 days ago

Unseat these cowards

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I am so disappointed in Jeffries. When Pelosi stepped back, I thought we might get some change but that was dumb of me to think a Democrat would have a spine. They are so floppy.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

He has a spine. He faces criticism and outrage from people like you every day. He likes what is happening. Wealthy Democratic Party donors like what is happening. They want a paramilitary police state.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 day ago

Lost hope in it as soon as she announced a successor instead of letting anyone else try.

Especially as he's as strong and effective as a wet paper bag

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Dear Leader has something on both of them.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Or just Schumer thinks the issue is the person leading ICE and DHS, not that they have too much impunity.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 37 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The Democrats are why we have fascism ascendant in this country by refusing to be an opposition party.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I'm beginning to think they both spent a lot of time raping trafficked children on Trump and Epstein's Pedophile Island and need the distraction.

[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago

Add em to the list

[–] pantomime@leminal.space 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I swear man, people don't hate neoliberals enough. Complete traitors to our country, and for what? Hard times require strong, courageous people to take charge and lead. The average American that voted for Harris in 2024 has more love for this country and bigger balls than these people ever will. Absolute cowards.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Controlled opposition operating accordingly

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›