this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2026
483 points (99.4% liked)

politics

27087 readers
2974 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In relation to this, thinking about a new community for Political Activism. Calls to action, that kind of thing.

The rules would be super simple:

  1. Purpose is for protest organizing. [Country, City, State]

  2. Absolutely no calls for violent action.

  3. No links to fundraisers. Too rife for fraud and abuse. Stories about fundraisers would be fine, but no GoFundMes, etc.

Think there's room for PolticalActivism?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

What I don't get is how ICE is still allowed to walk around masked up and unidentified as individuals.

Is there any kind of coordinated sousveillance being done by activists? These people should all be getting identified because even if another admin comes in, before the Republican one exits, they'll be covering up/shredding records on who is employed in ICE.

[–] artifactsofchina@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

+1 for the new community idea. I would definitely followi it. I remember when occupy was happening there was organising via reddit. It may have just been lots of pizzas being ordered, but it did seem like a legitimate community.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 12 points 2 days ago

Here is the latest video of the murder, from the butcher's own camera.

Renee Good's final words to her murderer: “That’s fine dude, I’m not mad at you.”

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 72 points 3 days ago (244 children)

"Fatally shooting" someone is called murder when it's calculated and done to the back of the head of a mother trying to drive away BTW

[–] hanrahan@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

Not if its under the auspices of the state. They are after all the entity describing murder. When the armed forces kill somone for example (recently in Venezuela butnalos Nigera etal)

The state calls its own violence law, but that of the individual, crime - Max Stirner

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 44 points 3 days ago (5 children)

People say it was 2nd degree murder, but I say it was 1st degree. To me, he had enough time to decide on killing someone.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago

Based on his behavior before, during, and after the murder it’s clear that it was planned, calculated, and premeditated. He was intentionally creating the circumstances to give himself an opportunity to murder somebody.

He is a murderer and deserves to hang.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 24 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Failure to render medical aid, and actively interfering with medical aid from others demonstrates intent and escalates it from 2nd to 1st.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 31 points 3 days ago

In my previous comment I said that I thought manslaughter would be the appropriate charge. But no, interfering with medical aid demonstrates clear intent to escalate it to 1st degree.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (242 replies)
[–] LemmyFeed@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

In relation to this, thinking about a new community for Political Activism. Calls to action, that kind of thing.

I think that's a great idea, I often lament not being more connected to events and calls to action because I don't have reddit or meta apps. I often don't hear about things until after they've occurred.

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 5 points 1 day ago

The cure to this is getting involved with activist or community groups in your area

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 41 points 3 days ago

The officer can argue all he wants that from his point of view it appeared for a split second that she was going to run him over (although he'd have to explain why he shot her after he was obviously no longer in the car's path).

But in the video footage it is obvious that she was not trying to run him over and trying to pin domestic terrorism charges on her is a blatant cover-up attempt.

load more comments
view more: next ›