this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2026
366 points (99.7% liked)

Games

22713 readers
398 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org 29 points 3 days ago

If they don't want you to form a union and go to such lenghts to prevent unions from forming, you know that unions are a good thing for workers and a bad thing for bosses and owners. You might want to think about joining your union.

[–] Toto@lemmy.world 53 points 4 days ago (2 children)

71 people lose their jobs just to send a message

[–] Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 41 points 4 days ago (1 children)

And the message is:

Unions should be a constitutional right

(And it is, in Denmark)

[–] TheJesusaurus@sh.itjust.works 26 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

It is also a right in Canada, where this happened and where we don't refer to our rights as "constitutional" since they don't primarily derive from our constitution but rather from the charter of freedoms and case law

[–] OpenPassageways@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

These employees did exercise their right to unionize, but there's no way to force employers to keep the union. A union just means that you can bargain collectively, and it should theoretically protect employees because what kind of scummy employer wants to fire ALL their employees, right? Turns out Ubisoft IS that scummy.

[–] TheJesusaurus@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I mean it absolutely is illegal to retaliate against unionizing workers by firing them, that's why they didn't say "we fired them because they unionized". And Canada isn't America, we don't have right to work legislation and you can't generally just fire people en masse without cause out of the blue

[–] MolochAlter@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Except ubisoft is hemorrhaging money so it's an extremely easy sell to say "the studio is not profitable and we're in dire need to cut waste" and indeed can the lot.

[–] TheJesusaurus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They can, and they can try to make the case that this is unrelated to unionization and fight that in court. Good luck

[–] MolochAlter@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I mean, I'd bet dollars to donuts Ubisoft would win it handily if it gets to a class action or whatever equivalent.

For one, they're basically on the verge of falling over so the economic motivation is a no-brainer.

For two, it's a massive multinational company headquartered in France (a country with stronger labour laws than Canada) with plenty of legal advice available on these matters. I highly doubt they'd do it this blatantly if they were not confident this is an easy sell, instead of waiting something like 6 months to separate the 2 events enough for plausible deniability.

For three, good luck holding a foreign company accountable, in general.

[–] Zagorath@quokk.au 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I highly doubt they’d do it this blatantly if they were not confident this is an easy sell

I mean, I would have agreed with you, except we've also just recently seen even more blatant and indefensible union-busting from Rockstar in the UK, another country with good labour laws, and another country with more than adequate legal resources.

I think you're probably right that Ubisoft has sufficient legal cover to win this case, but that's because of the merits of this case, not because a big company from a country with good laws could never do something stupidly illegal.

[–] MolochAlter@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Very fair lol

[–] TheJesusaurus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

Oh they will win it for sure yah

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 19 points 4 days ago (1 children)

And that message is "Don't ever buy from Ubisoft ever again"

[–] MolochAlter@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Their games have been reheated bongwater broth for more than a decade now, more predictable than even Sony and far less competent in execution, did you need more reasons?

[–] jodanlime@midwest.social 46 points 4 days ago

I've been avoiding ubi for a decade or longer because they suck in many other ways, but here's another reason to not give them a single penny.

[–] weirdo_from_space@sh.itjust.works 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Ubisoft is actually the worst possible video game corporation.

They almost never make a game that's worthy of anyone's time, their business practices are scummy, they kill off their games and tell people to get used to not owning them, treat their workers like shit and their stock price is in the gutter so not even the wallstreet ghouls benefit from how awful they are.

It's incredible.

[–] steeznson@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Rockstar had a similar scandal firing unionising workers last year

Yeah, I remember that. They also treat their players like absolute shit in general. But at least Rockstar makes games people enjoy and provides shareholder value. Ubisoft sucks so much they are actively harmful to everyone involved.

[–] Whowebe@europe.pub 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Here if over 50% want to form a union its illegal to stop it. I wonder if the USA has that?

[–] better_world@slrpnk.net 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

This was in Canada… and Ubisoft is French.

[–] st3ph3n@midwest.social 26 points 4 days ago

Absolute scumbags.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 11 points 4 days ago

Need more to unionise at the same time.

[–] slimerancher@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

What are the chances that it was shut down because of the unionization, vs just bad timing?

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 52 points 4 days ago

100% because of unionization; this is capitalist formula.

[–] borth@sh.itjust.works 23 points 4 days ago

They said they closed it as a "cost-cutting measure"... The only costs that increased was that the studio unionized, and unionized studios "cost" more.

[–] TheJesusaurus@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 days ago

There's zero chance this was coincidence

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 days ago