this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2026
358 points (88.9% liked)

RPGMemes

14796 readers
545 users here now

Humor, jokes, memes about TTRPGs

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Seriously. Every form of entertainment has baked-in political assumptions, and that definitely includes #ttrpg . You might choose not to examine them, but this is an active choice on your part, and you don't get to pretend that your entertainment is "free of politics".

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rosswinn@ttrpg.network 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

RPGs, much like SF, have always been a mechanism to explore social issues in philosophy, governance, and thought. In Human society I don’t personally believe that “politics” can be avoided in any group anywhere. —of course that’s just one man’s opinion.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 31 points 4 days ago (3 children)

You can tell what someone’s politics are by what they consider political.

I was astonished at some of the Steam reviews of Outer Worlds after playing it. People proper pissed off that their experience had been ruined because there’s a female side character with an optional side quest where she wants a date with another woman. Like how thoroughly filled with hate do you have to be as a person, to be fine with all the mass killing but suddenly get a moralistic high horse about a fictional character going on a dinner date you don’t approve of.

Sad that Steam are making a comment of their own by allowing those reviews to stay up.

[–] Logical@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

While I haven't read those reviews, I think the implications of Steam removing reviews would be worse, since they would effectively be manipulating the user score of a game. User reviews are just that, user reviews. The score should indicate what users think, whatever their reasons may be for thinking it, no?

I don't disagree with the rest of what you said though.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 days ago

How DARE you make your game try to reflect reality.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 4 points 4 days ago

Steam definitely has a libertarian streak, seemingly. I wish I had started switching over to GOG a lot sooner.

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 76 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (5 children)

~~This douchebag isn't exactly the most appropriate for this meme.~~

*First draft was the op crowder meme. Good on op for updating it.

[–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone 66 points 5 days ago (1 children)

He changed it to Calvin, but this comment is hilarious now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 25 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

This template really needs to die.

Edit: this was meant for the Crowder template. Calvin is cool.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago

I came here after the edit and got scared that Watterson did something.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 40 points 5 days ago (4 children)

"I don't want to talk about/see politics" is always synonym to "I support the status quo, and I will aggressively reject anything that goes against it".

Nothing that happens on a public space is free of politics, even when it's not controversial.

[–] edible_funk@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago

Just MLK's white moderate doing white moderate things. Funny how shit don't change.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 31 points 5 days ago

EVERYTHING is politics and the shitheads who complain are the ones who made it that way.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 27 points 5 days ago

People do not all have the same working definition of "politics". Many people seem to use it to mean "overt content about contemporary issues", but that's not really a good definition.

If your game has sentient creatures with agency and desires, it has politics.

For example, if your game has a king, there's politics. Having the people accept monarchy is a political statement. It's not as hot-button as, say, having slavery, but it's still political.

You might not be surprised if your players react to a world with chattel slavery by trying to free the slaves and end that institution. The same mechanism may lead them to want to end absolute monarchy. They see something in the setting they perceive as unjust, and want to change it.

A lot of people are kind of... uncritical, about many things. They don't see absolute monarchy as "political" because it's a familiar story trope. They are happy to accept this uncritically so they can get to the fun part where you get a quest to slay the dragon. (Note that the target of killing the dragon rather than, say, negotiating or rehoming it is also political)

People then get frustrated because they feel stupid, and they're being blocked from pursuing the content they want. They just want to, for example, do a tactical mini game about fighting a big monster that spits fire. They don't want to talk about the merits of absolute monarchy or slaying sentient creatures.

It's okay to not always want to engage in the political dimension. That doesn't mean it's not there. If someone responds to the king giving you a quest with "wait, this is an absolute monarchy where the first born son becomes king? That's fucked up" they're not "making it political". It already was political.

If you present a man and a woman as monogamously married in your game, that's political. That's a statement. If you show a big queer polycule, that's also a statement. The latter will ping the aforementioned uncritical players as "political", because it's more atypical, but both are "political".

Some of this can be handled in session 0. But sometimes you learn that some people in the group have different tastes and probably shouldn't play together.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 25 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Same people who complain about Nazis being the enemy in Wolfenstein

EVERYTHING is politics. It absolutely affects every aspect of life, ESPECIALLY fascism

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 20 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

All I want is more nice unpolitical games like Bioshock or Wolfenstein

And not the woke nonsense of having female or PoC main characters.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 8 points 4 days ago

I disagree, because typically it means someone is racist or sexist and just doesn't want to see people of color or queer characters. Such people may still be willing to engage with the political aspects of their gaming insofar as they may join initiatives like Stop Killing Games or argue that game devs should be treated better, but they're just bigoted assholes who can't handle people of color or queer characters.

Also don't mistake this as a defense of them. They're deplorable. I'm just saying I don't agree with the statement as written.

[–] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I absolutely want politics in gaming. Without it, we'd be stuck in the arcade era. Sure, sometimes I also like to zone out on puzzle games which are largely devout of it. Imagine The Witcher 1 without politics, is there even a game there?

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (6 children)

What's the political assumption of pong?

I mean I don't disagree with the sentiment, the moment something has world building or a story or goals that relate to real life non-abstractly, there's at least a political assumption, potentially an intentional statement. And people just don't notice when it conforms to their world view. But politics free entertainment can exist, even if being able to engage in that entertainment necessarily requires some sort of engagement with real politic systems.

Though the most memorable games tend to be the ones very intentionally making statements anyway.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 5 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Glancing at Wikipedia for any Pong discourse. Found a likely example. Turns out Pong had a bug (read: feature) that contributed to its place as the first commercial success in video games. Quote,

the in-game paddles were unable to reach the top of the screen. This was caused by a simple circuit that had an inherent defect. Instead of dedicating time to fixing the defect, Alcorn decided it gave the game more difficulty and helped limit the time the game could be played [per payment]

So, Pong established the concept of video games systematically favouring the rich. Are we there yet, is that political enough?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Hazzard@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Closest I've got, which I'm surprised nobody has mentioned, is the very concept that entertainment is a worthwhile pursuit, and that we aren't made solely to work. Pong serves no functional utility, which is a statement unto itself.

That said, it feels a bit like a cop out to me, from what that quote is supposed to mean. I'd be content to rephrase it to "any sufficiently complex entertainment has politics in it". For example, I feel like this could almost certainly be said about stories in general, but I'd struggle to find the politics in many simple children's books, besides "children should be read to". Although the more I think about it, teaching all children to read was once quite political.

[–] stray@pawb.social 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Children's stories have tons of politics. They're almost always intentionally pushing a message of some kind, like "Be nice to ugly people because they might turn out to be really hot and/or magical later."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 days ago

Pong represents the slow but inevitable march towards socialism

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Ziggurat@jlai.lu 7 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Actually it's hard to keep politic out of RPG.

In game, politic is what makes the game more than just killing random person you know the Princess who want to escape a political marriage, the advisor looking to become the lord, the church and and the merchant guild trying to gain influence ? All of that is politics. and all of that is what makes your campaign fun.

In real-life, like any other social activity especially if you get wider than a closed circle, politics get involved, your club need to talk with the mayor to get a slot in the municipal culture centre or rent a room in a school. Moreover, RPG tend to have a bad reputation and be not correct according to conservative which make it even more political than tons of other RPG, if you let church and right-winger tell you which hobby are acceptable you won't be able to play RPG

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I love politics in gaming, I loved Fallout 3, NV,4 (I still enjoyed it but to a lesser extent), Cyberpunk, and Outer Worlds 1/2. I love it when a game has multiple factions, I love when you get to really understand the politics of a fictional world, and I love stories involving politics.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bobbysaurus@lemmy.world 19 points 5 days ago (18 children)

I feel like a lot of people, who complain about politics in gaming are not choosing to examine/not examine the political assumptions, they are simply not realising that they’re there. Often these themes reside deeper in the storytelling so you have to actually engage with it to be aware of them. People who complain about it only choose a handful of topics to be mad about, because they are against it.

No. Their politics is being default to the point they can completely avoid self awareness.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] DarkMetatron@feddit.org 16 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I don't care about politics in my games (and shows/movies) as long as it fits into the world and into the story. A TV show examples for that is Torchwood. It has to be the most gay scify show (at least it is the most gay I know) but all of it fits together and I love the show, even as a totaly hetero/cis guy. It doesn't feel forced but is just how everything just it. Not sure if I can explain it good, hope it is somewhat to understand.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I learned after the fact, that most of Torchwood is just how John Barrowman is. He insisted on having a scene with a shirtless Stephen Amell in Arrow as well.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 6 points 4 days ago

only conservatives ever think about this, same goes for movies/shows with "too much inclusivity, and diversity"

"Politics are genuinely fun and everyone wants to see them all the time, and the people who say they don't want to see it like it even more, they just wish they were seeing different politics." -hbomberguy

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 12 points 5 days ago

“I don’t want politics in my gaming” = “I stopped growing, emotionally, the first time I saw Jugga in Conker’s Bad Fur Day”

[–] HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 5 days ago

Feels kind of ironic using Chowder for this meme, but I agree with the message :P

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

they want something that won't challenge their preconceptions one iota. they don't care about artists crafting a story, they want slop that confirms their biases.

[–] riwo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 5 days ago

calvin >>>>>>>> that conservative cunt

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Politics in gaming is awesome, ham fisted writing and design wrapped up in an opinion lecturing the player so it breaks the universe ruleset is crap and does more damage to what ever message you were trying to push.

Sadly a lot of socially important messages are pushed as a selling point by people who don't really have the background to fully create a bridge that speaks to People.

This is the same for a lot of creative work our artists are increasingly coming from privileged and protected backgrounds that we're losing the depth and edge of the art. Indie games as usual are the standard games like Star dew address so much about humanity in a beautiful way.

I play crusader kings for the plot not the politics😄

[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

If it has a story it’s political

If it involves people it's political.

load more comments
view more: next ›