this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2026
211 points (99.5% liked)

World News

51887 readers
2324 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 90 points 6 days ago (6 children)

This admin doesn't give a shit. They are testing the world. Respond with force now, or more countries fall. The American I knew and loved is dead. If the world unites and invades, you will have millions on your side in the states.

[–] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 17 points 6 days ago (2 children)

And millions will be pissed and counter attack or at least try to maintain their position (looking at you southern states.)

It’s unfortunate but an invasion is more likely to start Civil War 2 Electric Boogaloo.

The better option would be boosting the military force in Greenland & Canada (geography and annexation desires.) to basically show that yes invading other countries is not acceptable.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

We're heading to balkanization one way or the other. The US cannot survive in its current state. States can't decide to fight or flight, it's fight or die

[–] DokPsy@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Is it bad that I'm partly hoping the US pokes the Canada polar bear and they go full Geneva checklist on the administration? Wouldn't be the first time they've burned the white house

[–] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 3 points 5 days ago

But late for that. The Ballroom is bound to demolish more than the West Wing given Trump’s obsession of size

[–] freebee@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Exactly this. EU shouldn't issue hollow statements, France/UK should just send nuclear armed vessels to the greenland area and declare they are an alliance with Denmark...

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago

This is an actual shit post. Come on man

[–] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago

Yep, I'm an American but I'll be damned if i let anybody know it. So fucking ashamed of this country right now

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 days ago

California would literally pick up arms and start fighting against the US in a situation like this.

[–] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I find it unfathomable that an invasion would be attempted. IMO Trump has put himself at the center of a potential Who Shot Mr Burns situation.

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 41 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I forsee the largest proliferation of nuclear weapons since the cold war.

[–] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 12 points 6 days ago

I think that's accurate.

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 33 points 6 days ago (3 children)

If they were interested in defending Greenland they would base support troops there so any American action would require direct engagement with EU military personnel.

[–] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 13 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I agree. But that would also trigger Trump into action, so they may be hoping diplomacy will still hold out, futile as that may be. Hopefully they're building a joint task force in the meantime.

[–] freebee@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You think he still requires triggers?

[–] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Yeah. It seems part of why he pulled the trigger on Mudaro is that Mudaro was dancing in a mocking fashion while Trump was trying to put the pressure on. He overreacted and sent in delta force with no plan for what to do after they got him... The US is likely putting a bunch of options in front of him at all times as they would any president, but he just gets pissed off and picks an option while he's angry and sundowning rather than considering what's strategically best for literally anyone else, not to mention feeling desperate as his power diminishes into lame duck territory. It's starting to seem more and more like he's bored of the game and just picking the most cataclysmic options, because he's demented, so the whole fucking world has to walk on egg shells around the shit-pants fucker. He is probably also being encouraged to pick bad options by bad people that he trusts like the fucking moron he is, like Putin, so he's always teetering in a shitty direction.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 days ago

There are a bunch of non-US units on the US base already.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world -3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The US military would see that coming before they even left European ports.

Yeah, that is the entire fucking point of doing it.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

Hmm I didn’t see a commitment to respond with force. Just a statement of what is “right,” as if Trump gives one shit about that. Fail.

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Cool, cool, cool. Hey, any particular reason you're putting out this statement? Or, just, y'know, because whatever?

[–] dyathinkhesaurus@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Trump's probably willing to make A Deal. Something like, "Give me your minerals or I will find a pretext to invade, and take them anyway".

Or something like that.

Miller's gonna spank himself into a coma at the thought.

[–] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 11 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

They already could have negotiated a win win deal. This is as much about projecting strength as it is anything else. Trump's (and Miller's) power is diminishing. He's in lame duck territory and he's basically bored of the affordability crisis. The Epstein files are part of it, but more than anything it's about how he's losing his grip on power. He's trying to spark a flame that's run out of fuel by rubbing two sticks of dynamite together, and it was probably Putin's idea.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The question is, will there be any action if Trump invades

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 3 points 5 days ago

Spoiler alert, no.

The General Public is going to have find ways to get back at the US. Strikes at ports to prevent goods leaving for the US or US made goods coming in, boycotts, etc.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

The Turd Reich will do as Shitler commands until they are stopped.