i thought they already did this in 2016. i downloaded it, looked up what it said about my family, laughed at how effective my digital disinformation campaign had been. it was fun.
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
It's not gonna make a difference.
Trump is going to answer for fucking children.
No matter HOW many countries he invades to try and deflect the public from it.
Keep your eyes on the Epstein.
I wish I had your faith.
He's going to be president until hes no longer fit to stand trial, then some loyal idiot will replace him and pardon him and he will live out his days in his Mara lago suite.
By then, the USA and the rest of the world will have much bigger problems.
Then we should wait until he's in it and then burn it to the ground
I believe even despite the article I posted that we will win big in the midterms but we must keep pressure up and fight everyday for a future we can believe in.
How did I upvote both of you? Damn this world is alarming and confusing right now.
Because at this point both timelines are equally possible. It's Schrodinger's justice.
I’ve been hearing “he’ll answer for it” for a decade now. Believe it when I see it.
People have been saying that about him since the goddamn 90s.
Who is going to make him answer for it?
Trump is going to answer for fucking children.
Do you have a particular plan on how you're getting close to him? Because he's pretty well guarded most of the time.
Actually you know what, don't tell me if you do, that would be counter productive
If not through a legal system, then through the court of public opinion.
That "answer" may lie in the history books yet to be written.
My thoughts are that it should be a repurposing of every Trump creation made during this administration. Ballroom where the East Wing once was? Naah, a museum commemorating Presidential corruption, starting with the most recent and going back through US history.
Arch of Truimph? Hmmm. It becomes a memorial to women and children that survived sexual abuse at the hands of those in political and economic power.
Hall of Presidents? Just Trump's name and a plaque with the years he was in office and an asterisk with a footnote to see the East Wing Ballroom Museum for the facts of his administrative corruption and that painting he hated as his official portrait.
Thing little Don-don wants to be remembered fondly.
Don't and don't let stand any insistence he was anything other than a pedophile who burned the country to the ground and used the US Constitution as his own personal toilet paper because he was to chickenshit to face the consequences for fucking children..
Keep your eyes on the Esptein.
Hitler called this 'list' the Black Book. It had all the enemies of the State on it. In America, they are called Voters.
Electioneering is not a power expressed to the federal government through the constitution. So, its reserved to the states via the 10th Amendment such that the right to vote is equally provided to all races and genders above the age of majority. There is neither a legitimate nor constitutional reason for the federal government to put together a voter roll.
This is how they destroy the Republic for good
“States rights”
America doesn't have an electoral roll?
They have state wide ones. As their Constitution delegates elections to individual States.
Historically the fear has been that attempts to centralize a complete national voter roll would be used to target citizens with…undesirable voting patterns. It’s similar to why we don’t have a national gun registry. The irony shouldn’t be lost that it is the Republican Party that has historically opposed such registry’s on privacy grounds.