this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2026
220 points (98.7% liked)

politics

27097 readers
2625 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The US has no moral authority to attack Venezuela, regardless of Maduro’s authoritarian nature. Both can be true: Maduro is a dictator who caused immense harm to his people, and US military intervention is an illegal act of aggression that will not resolve the crisis of democracy in Venezuela.

The region’s future must be determined by people themselves, free from the shadow of empire

all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] witty_username@feddit.nl 74 points 1 week ago (2 children)

"If the US can unilaterally launch military strikes against sovereign nations at a whim, then the entire framework of international law becomes meaningless. This tells every nation that might and power trump legality and sovereignty."

Although I agree that this is bad, it is unsurprising. The states have been devolving towards this for a long time. I'd argue that the patriot act was one of the more audacious steps in this direction. I suppose there were earlier ones, I am not very knowledgeable about this topic

[–] TheDrunkard@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

You're right, despite your confessed ignorance.

The US has been doing it since the beginning, including the invasion of Quebec in 1775. The only difference now is that everything gets broadcast, especially on social media.

[–] redlemace@lemmy.world 54 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Trump just sent a very dangerous message to ~~Latin America~~ the world

[–] TheDrunkard@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He just said to China, go ahead and invade Taiwan, we aren't going to stop it.

[–] BoJackHorseman@piefed.social 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The entire world is going to turn into 3 or 4 monopolies, just like American corporations

[–] SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Central/South America would be well served from establishing something like the EU. The US has too long been able to act with little impunity in their back yard and the world suffers for it.

[–] GutterRat42@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

The moment they start even trying to organize themselves, the US will bomb them. So many US-backed coups in Latin America, and they still have the audacity of complaining about immigration.

[–] TheOctonaut@mander.xyz 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean even if it was, I don't think Mercosur has the teeth to prevent this sorta thing.

[–] TheOctonaut@mander.xyz 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm confused about what you think the EU is if you think it has "teeth".

[–] ngdev@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

surely they can do economic sanctions right?

[–] FrenchGameDev@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

its not only latin america. i hope we remove all their military bases in europe, ban all air charter from us and let the demographic of a failed state with missmanaged economy do their work.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Europe doesn't have the stones to ask Trump politely to stop, much less anything else on that list of fantasies.

[–] BoJackHorseman@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

You can vote on it right?

Europe is a democracy unlike China.

What's the point of democracy if you can vote only once every 4 years? That's like 15 times in a lifetime.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

I'd say it would be perfectly fair if some country wanted to come to the US to kidnap a despotic leader and hold them accountable in an international court of some sort. You know, now that the precedent is set.

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago

All the oil, cocain and rare earth's are mine!

[–] falseWhite@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I got banned on ml instance for saying the exact same thing - both are bad. Apparently, over there they think Maduro is a good guy.

[–] ngdev@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

i got banned on ml for saying "rich coming from a tankie lol" on a post about usa being bad for the kidnapping

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago

They can't do anything about it. So what's the point?

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Say what you will about Trump but it's a well calculated move.

If democrats step in, he'll accuse them of supporting rigged elections. Meanwhile the hidden lesson in allowing this to happen is that Trump is above the law.

It fits Trump perfectly, and the purpose is of course to get incredibly rich.

[–] BoJackHorseman@piefed.social -2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Democrats would have done the same. Obama invaded 8 countries in 2016.

Elections are for entertainment for show for the masses. The people who actually run the Western world are the billionaires and the 3 letter organisations.