this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2026
152 points (94.7% liked)

Apple

20390 readers
2 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tyler@programming.dev 36 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I don’t think M1 has anything to do with the topic except as an advertisement. Title could literally be “MacBook Air takes a direct shrapnel hit” (air is relevant since it’s the thinness that matters) and it would be just as effective of a title.

[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 months ago

There are minor differences in the internal components, from 2019 to 2020 MBAirs, and a notable case change in 2021.

The 2020 model IS pretty tough, though. It’s the last iteration of 11 years refining an already pretty durable form factor.

M1 Model is outdated and no longer sold.

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

dang, his screen craced on his macboo?

[–] tiny_hedgehog@piefed.social 22 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I’m glad he’s O_.

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Apple should switch him to a new model without charge (money, not battery). The advertisement can't get any better.

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Why would they though? They already got plenty advertisement without paying for it.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago

Because it’s nothing to them and a lot to some Of their market. Also, it would make Trump squirm.

[–] AllYourSmurf@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I wonder if he has AppleCare?

[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 months ago

For real, if there was apple’s extended warranty on it, they might have replaced it after the first explosion, but not the 2nd (unless PR opportunity involved).

But it’s a five year old computer, that warranty ended two years ago.

[–] Karjalan@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

"sorry, by modifying the hardware you voided your warranty"

[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 11 points 3 months ago

Anti school shooting measures meet the actual war

[–] r8KNzcU8TzCroexsE2xbWC@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

He was saved by a bible.com tab

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

who the fuck let Fox News in here??

[–] essell@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Can a shrapnel hit be direct?

[–] eleijeep@piefed.social 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Can a shrapnel hit be indirect?

[–] essell@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I think so, coz shrapnel is the stuff flying out randomly from the first "hit" 🤔

[–] ozymandias117@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Would that mean a grenade rarely causes direct damage? The explosion is really only designed to throw shrapnel

[–] essell@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I guess that comes down to frame of reference..

You don't have to hit a guy with the grenade itself, the indirect shrapnel will do the work.

[–] ozymandias117@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, just a thought experiment, because we do consider shrapnel ancillary in the case of a bullet...

I'm not sure if a grenade is a direct or indirect hit

Rockets are similar where we call it a "direct hit" but realistically it's just blowing up a large enough area that the target happened to be in the vicinity...

[–] essell@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Can definitely pick this apart, reminds me of examining forces in secondary school during physics exams.

My thinking on the original point is that shrapnel is never aimed, even if deliberate, as you say it's just there, it comes alongside the attacking action.

Then again, in the sense that shrapnel typically goes directly from one place to another, it's pretty direct

[–] nyctre@piefed.social 2 points 3 months ago

Sure, but even tho it's random, it's still a direct shrapnel hit as opposed to a grazing hit, I think.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Maybe it would be if the shrapnel itself was going to hit his heart or spine?

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago
[–] finallymadeanaccount@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Must've been a 'surgical strike' ... by a doctor ... that the Apple kept away.

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 2 points 3 months ago

The missing K is being used to count the MacBook kill.

[–] B0rax@feddit.org 1 points 3 months ago

The m1 logicboard is tiny, so the shrapnel likely did not hit it. And the MacBook will work without a functioning battery.

[–] enbiousenvy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 months ago

cases like this made hardware sometimes doesn't look very fragile. while I had my laptop shorted and dead during power outage.

though granted maybe the sharpnel doesn't hit vital parts and maybe more modern laptop have better shortage protection compared to my 2015 laptop that was shorted.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 0 points 3 months ago

Years ago at uni my sister beat the shit out of a would-be mugger in a uni carpark with her macbook titanium. If nothing else, respect them as weapons

[–] PoisonPunk@lemmy.blahaj.zone -4 points 3 months ago

thank the 1000 or so chinese slaves on $2 a day who produced that #apple laptop. #JoinTheFediverse, #linux & #FOSS hard- & software