this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2025
769 points (99.7% liked)

Political Memes

2065 readers
1325 users here now

Non political memes: !memes@sopuli.xyz

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 163 points 1 week ago (3 children)

If it would "destroy the global order" then the global order needs to be destroyed.

[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago

It also just wouldn’t and that basically makes no sense at all other than to communicate some kind of incomprehensible fear

the only relevant technicality is that the global order wont destroy itself when it needs to. we gotta do it

[–] Bullerfar@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Thw global order died when America turned "America first" aka. Maga 9 years ago.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 50 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] marcos@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

Nobody ever bothers to clarify if "tanks on the streets" is a prediction or a threat...

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 39 points 1 week ago (3 children)

There is a scandal brewing in Sweden about this.

Apparently Princess Sofia had contact with Epstein through a Swedish businesswoman (who looks like a clown/hag, see attached), Sofia is keeping a very low profile due to this, and did not attend the Nobel Prize Party this year...

The Swedish businesswoman in question, Barbro Ehnbom who had ties with Epstein:

https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.bonniernews.se%2Fba%2Fa3e6b203-937d-4ff1-bf14-878d4d36673b.jpeg%3Fwidth%3D640%26format%3Dpjpg%26auto%3Davif&f=1&ipt=e78fd13acffdf2ce5fbecc80768e9e4105d240e1c9a92376bcbcd7100310c949

[–] ruuster13@lemmy.zip 25 points 1 week ago

To clarify, her appearance is the result of Mar-a-lago face.

[–] Duranie@leminal.space 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Gladys from Weapons.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 10 points 1 week ago

Looks like the lady from Weapons.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Epstein was a major fundraiser for the Democratic party. Trump is the head of the Republican party. And it's a two party system.

[–] SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

Theyre the same picture

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

But but but they're closer to not being overwhelmingly evil! They'll defund ICE once they've got a supermajority in the house and senate, the presidency, and patiently wait for the Supreme Court to die.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He specifically fundraised for democrats?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relationship_of_Bill_Clinton_and_Jeffrey_Epstein

Epstein's interactions with Clinton can be traced to the early 1990s. After donating $1,000 to Bill Clinton's presidential election campaign in 1991, Epstein donated $10,000 to the White House Historical Association in 1993 and, accompanied by Maxwell, attended a donors' reception hosted by President Clinton and First Lady Hillary Clinton.

...

Clinton and Epstein appeared to be on friendly terms; a photo from 2002 shows them together during a stop in Brunei, and in an interview that year Clinton praised Epstein as a "highly successful financier" and "a committed philanthropist".

...

According to one of his lawyers, Epstein was "part of the original group" that conceived the Clinton Global Initiative, a flagship program of Clinton's philanthropic work. This relationship extended to Maxwell as well – she and Epstein were invited guests at events early in the Clinton Foundation era, and Maxwell was noted as the likely social "glue" connecting Epstein to Clinton's world.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Oh, that's not at all what you implied.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Start with trump

load more comments
view more: next ›