this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2025
642 points (95.5% liked)

Microblog Memes

10088 readers
1498 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 100 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 50 points 1 week ago (1 children)

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-19418-4.pdf

Paper itself above. Need a deeper reading with my notes but on the surface the stats are so-so. They check normality, but don't confirm linearity (use of pmcc will not be valid without - there are also a few other conditions to check for hypothesis testing with PMCC if memory serves), use of a continuous test (PMCC, ANOVA, unpaired t's) for discrete (likert) data is also little controversial, but generally condoned.

As for the conclusion, not a psych phd so I'll assume they know their stuff!

[–] colonelp4nic@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

my personal rule of thumb is that if it's published in Nature, Cell, or another well-regarded journal, the statistical and experimental methodologies are almost certainly solid. Do you think I should adjust that rule going forward?

[–] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Honestly, I always poke the stats no matter how good the journal. The best way to read any article is as a skeptic (the onus is on the writer to prove their point), and any small irregularity is something to be queried.

No matter how good the journal, it's only as good as the reviewers, and reviewers are humans too. Odds are a paper in nature is all above board, but I'm somewhat of a pedant when it comes to checking test conditions.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 86 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Turns out walking through a sketchy area and being harassed are scary no matter what genitalia you have.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 82 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I wish they had tested all 8 scenarios: Male/female participant, male/female body, catcalled/not catcalled.

Because even as a man I don't feel comfortable being alone at a subway station at night. Nor can I imagine would I then enjoy being catcalled.

I wonder how much your VR body seen in a mirror affects this. My gut says not a lot but more data would've been great.

Now, if your own VR body does affect your reaction there must be bodies which maximize/minimize reactions. That'd be fun to test. You don't even have to limit yourself to human bodies, what if you're, say, a dinosaur (with body height still being the same)?

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But that would be actual science and not whatever the slop study in the article is.

[–] greygore@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I feel like if you’re going to slag off the study as “slop” you should at least follow the links to the study itself where you can see that they did in fact have a control group who were posed general questions instead of catcalling. They didn’t switch genders because that wasn’t the purpose of the study.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

While my first reaction was the same - "how would they react in male avatars?", that doesn't seem to be the point at all of this study but rather the potential of VR to change the subjects behaviour in real life by helping empathy along.

Introduction
[...]
Peck et al.13 found that White participants, after embodying a Black avatar, showed a reduction in implicit racial bias.
This principle has been extended to the context of gender-based violence.
Seinfeld et al.14 had male offenders embody a female victim of domestic violence, finding that the VR experience significantly improved their ability to recognize fear in female facial expressions—a deficit common in violent offenders15.
Similarly, other studies using 360° videos and immersive scenarios of sexual harassment have reported marked increases in empathy and changes in violent attitudes among participants16.
[...]
These findings collectively affirm the potential of VR as a rehabilitative tool for enhancing emotional understanding and mitigating harmful behaviors.

Building on this foundation, the present study utilizes immersive VR to provide male participants with a firsthand experience of catcalling.
While previous research has often focused on overt violence, our goal is to investigate the affective response to a more commonplace form of street harassment. We hypothesize that this embodied experience will elicit morally salient emotions like disgust and anger19,20,21.
By inducing this moral discomfort, the intervention aims to foster self-awareness and encourage a reconsideration of the behavior’s impact22, serving as a potential strategy to promote behavioral change.

That's fair, I only really glossed over the study.

But still, have they actually collected data to support illiciting these emotions works as a "potential strategy to promote behavioral change"? In the study, I haven't found anything like a pre and post experiment survey showing a different attitude towards catcalling. In my mind that's required to demonstrate the VR experiment is such a strategy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] yucandu@lemmy.world 53 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Did anyone study the opposite? I remember reading about a woman that pretended to be a man for a few weeks to write a book about it, and she described it as something like "soul crushingly lonely".

[–] Meron35@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Norah Vincent. She was particularly beloved by the manosphere because her experience pretending to be a man for 18 months (not just a few weeks) lead to her "conversion" from a feminist to realising that men too have their own problems.

Thought, she personally was already libertarian, and highly critical of trans people, so she reads more like a TERF imo.

Sadly passed away via assisted suicide a few years ago.

Norah Vincent - Wikipedia - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norah_Vincent

[–] msage@programming.dev 12 points 1 week ago (13 children)

Which is super ironic, as feminism acknowledges mens issues.

load more comments (13 replies)

I don't know of any studies, but I have heard anecdotes from trans men that say the same thing.

I once read a very well put together comment by a trans man on the subject of their experience with this before and after transitioning, and basically, because men are never supposed to show emotion, their relationships lack a level of emotional intimacy at a fundamental level. They said that their relationships with other men felt hollow and largely superficial.

It's also why men seemingly mistake friendship from women as flirting so frequently - because women can have a true emotional connection in their friendships with other women, but men can only get that same level of connection in romantic relationships or life or death scenarios such as war. Women also often treat men more coldly than they do other women as a result of this to avoid being mistaken for flirting with every man that they talk to (or because they view men as dangerous).

[–] placebo@lemmy.zip 49 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Regarding fear, our results show that this emotion is higher in the catcalling situation, however, there is no significant difference with the control condition. This suggests that experiencing an urban underground environment at night from a woman’s perspective is inherently fear-inducing, independent of explicit harassment.

Does it, though? It would be better if they had a control group where participants used a male avatar. My understanding is that both groups used female avatars:

In the experimental condition, the avatars used typical Italian catcalling expressions (documented in newspaper articles and sociological research on the topic of verbal street harassment), while in the control group (condition), the avatars posed general questions to the participants.

I have no doubt that it can be scary for a woman to be in this setting in real life. However, I'd like to see scientific proof that this feeling can be specifically induced in men who are controlling female characters in VR. Right now, it's more of an assumption, isn't it? As a gamer, I know that the location itself can be scary, that sound design (music, ambient sounds, voice acting) can be frightening, and that trying VR for the first time can also be uncomfortable.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 46 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

My guess is that the men who don't think they'd be bothered by cat-calling are imagining a scenario where there are lots of other people around and the risk of being physically attacked is very low. (Something like the stereotypical image of construction workers whistling at a woman walking by them on a busy sidewalk.) Being on a nearly-empty subway platform with the only other guy nearby accosting you is a genuinely risky situation even without pretending that you're a woman.

One time I was walking on the sidewalk when a car with several young women drove by and one of them leaned out the window and yelled something at me. I didn't hear what she said but I like to think that it was positive and it made my day, but the caveat is that I did not feel like I was in any physical danger at all from them.

[–] Wren@lemmy.today 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You said it. I compared notes, once, with my partner at the time, who occasionally dressed a bit flamboyant. Being shouted at made him feel annoyed and sad, which sucks, but he thought that put him on the same level as me.

The difference was he could recall each time he was catcalled, and was surprised to hear it happened just about daily to me. Even more surprised to hear that sometimes when I didn't respond, guys have followed me and kept shouting. Sometimes in groups. Extremely surprised to hear that on a few occasions I've actually had to run from these groups.

Catcalling is easy to ignore, but considering I literally had to run from strangers, I still slide my keys between my knuckles and get ready to sprint whenever I hear it.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Half Life 2 graphics for maximum immersion

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

"You. Pick up that can."

[–] 5gruel@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] binarytobis@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (3 children)

One time I was one of the very first people to play an MMO so my friends and I all grabbed up some really good names that are always taken before we start. I made six characters, two female, one of which I named “Beyonce” and put effort into making it look as much like her as possible.

On five of the characters people pretty much ignored me entirely, as usual. But when I played Beyonce people wanted to talk to me all the time. They would constantly invite me to stuff, give me things, name drop me in chat. Just kind of gather around me in town. Even other men who were playing female characters just assumed I was a woman.

I don’t know what it was about that character specifically, but it was a valuable insight into the life of women.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I had an extremely similar experience. It was astonishing how quick people assume you are a woman simply by having decent enough grammar and aren't a shitty person.

At least in an MMO it's not dangerous feeling. If anything, it kind of makes it easier to lead groups since you can get people to just do stuff with you. Not great insight into being a women though, people don't generally accept female leadership irl.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 7 points 1 week ago

I know what we are doing today, Ferb.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] udon@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Kind of unfortunate, that even here on lemmy most comments immediately flip to "but as a man I also feel scared". True, but it's not what this study is about. Maybe in 2026 we can try to just read something like this and take it as a prompt that, maybe, some things are not about us. Maybe we should do something about catcalling. We can talk about violence against men and loneliness at a different occasion.

Living in Japan, the country famous for being completely safe for everyone, this gap recently became clearer to me. As it turns out, when people talk about safety in Japan, they primarily mean that you won't be beaten up and nobody steals your wallet. But there are so many weird creeps around here. I'm really quite happy I don't live here as a woman.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RumorsOfLove@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 week ago

just a little bit empathy and imagination... and creepy video game textures

[–] Pippipartner@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I looked at the comments.

I knew it was a mistake, I did it anyways.

It sure was a mistake.

[–] starelfsc2@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I would look at the study, while the problem is 100% real and anyone with any empathy should realize is real, to say the study supports it is a bit far fetched. Looking at the scenarios they created and the avatars, it's all a bit uncanny valley and backrooms sort of feeling. Sort of ps2 graphics but in vr.

E: I think the conclusion puts it best, vr is a good tool for showing people what a lot of women have to deal with, and how terrible it can feel. It's like rp for people who have trouble empathizing or don't get why it matters.

[–] Makhno@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I just had surgery and have grown a new appreciation for the fear women can feel. Im a taller dude and lifted 4-5 days a week, so im fairly bigger than other guys my size, but since my surgery im so fucking fragile and have no ability to defend myself. I live in a city and walking around at night has become a whole new experience. Before I never worried much being out alone, but now I have a constant anxiety, a fear that someone will come and overpower me. Hurt me.

I know its not entirely the same, but the fear of others in this capacity definitely makes me much more empathetic towards what I used to view as overreaction.

Ladies, I apologize.

[–] Wren@lemmy.today 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Lady here.

You don't have to be sorry, just stay safe and keep trying to be a good person. I wish you well on your recovery.

edit: It's not so much about being overpowered, though that is a thing, as the mental exhaustion from having to deal with so many people who think you owe them something. The book "Verbal Judo" helped me way more than self-defense classes, I recommend it, it's the art of de-escalation by being snarky and delightful.

[–] Wren@lemmy.today 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Interesting experiment.

The article on Phys.org

The paper on Nature.com

Some very condensed info:

Women disproportionately experience gender based violence and aggression in the wild. Researchers wanted to see if the experience of men being harassed and catcalled in a woman's avatar could promote empathy and understanding. This experiment on 36 male students (average age of 23) was based on other studies that found similar results, including a study on male offenders of gender based violence — to test if first-person VR experiences as women could increase pro-social behaviors.

The students had "no prior experience" with interpersonal aggression or catcalling as victims or perpetrators, measured on a scale with a maximum threshold.

The scene began in a bedroom, where participants were able to move and see themselves as their avatar in a mirror.

In a control group, the participants were asked innocuous questions instead of being catcalled.

Edit: For anyone asking: Why didn't they study why men don't feel safe? You can look up and post those studies. Nothing is stopping you. This is about the prosocial effects of this VR scenario. Need more support? !mensliberation@lemmy.ca and !mensmentalhealth@lemmy.world are two great communities to discuss men's issues.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (26 children)

Oh this is such nonsense.

They basically decided "what if we tested a scenario that has been happening in ChatVR for about 10 years."

When I play a shooting game in VR I don't think I'm going to die, I do not experience fear. Any claims along those lines are at best overstated and at worst straight up lies.

Also what's this research supposed to prove anyway?

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Ah yes, the ever popular "I've never experienced it, so it doesn't exist" argument.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] plyth@feddit.org 11 points 1 week ago

Turn your logic around. If men feel the fear when it is just a simulation then real life for women is much worse.

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Male American here. Always had a hard time internalizing women's fear, hard to truly put myself in their shoes. My first wife really woke me.

At the major hospital she worked at, the female nurses often needed escorts through the parking garage. There were alerts about shady characters hanging around. She clearly got roofied one night, and when her friends compared notes, it had happened to many of them at that same restaurant (a really nice one!).

I was a small guy, little punker in the late 80s and early 90s. There were places we couldn't go or the skins or rednecks would get us. And yet that doesn't even begin to compare with the fear women must deal with.

I've had a pretty fucking wild life, but I've never been stalked, drugged or raped.

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I haven't read this study but what matters to me is, are these same men catcallers themselves? Most men I know don't catcall and already understand it's unpleasant so I'm not surprised this is their reaction

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

There’s a numerical asymmetry to stuff like this. You could have only 1 in 1000 men be catcallers yet a single catcaller could catcall thousands of women on their way to work (stereotypically from a construction site as they walk by).

[–] Breezy@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Having done construction with temps who did this, they indeed catcall anything that looks like a female. 2 different people were like this and i yelled at both to no avail. They were also just ahitty people to even talk to. I had both of them black listed after one day.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

I do kinda think everyone should have to Freaky Friday swap with anyone they disdain or don't have empathy for, and also one random swap.

I've never been bothered by catcalling but haven't had it happen in a dangerous feeling situation.

[–] sol6_vi@lemmy.makearmy.io 6 points 1 week ago

Welcome. Welcome to our study. You have either chosen or been chosen...

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (5 children)

This looks more like sexism dressed up as science, rather than science.

If the men really felt that they were in the body of a woman, then I would expect the overwhelming emotion to be gender dysphoria.

If not, then they answered whatever they felt they should. That's a well-known problem in such studies (eg Social Desirability Bias). Maybe they answered what they felt the interviewer wanted to hear. Or maybe they just regurgitated sexist stereotypes. Imagine putting the avatar in a dirty kitchen and asking: Don't you feel an overwhelming desire to clean?

But suppose that this is a good "empathy building" exercise. What is the take-away? Say, some years down the road, these men are hiring employees. There are qualified female candidates, but the job requires working at night, or maybe being alone with male clients. Hmm. Benevolent sexism is still sexism.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›