this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2025
303 points (99.3% liked)

News

35749 readers
2280 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Puddinghelmet@lemmy.world 57 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

Trump has been hinting for several weeks at carrying out attacks in Venezuela. In October, he acknowledged that he had given the foreign intelligence agency, the CIA, secret orders to plan attacks in the country.

And for months, the United States has been attacking boats it claims are linked to drug trafficking from Venezuela, but it has not provided evidence that these “narcoterrorists” actually pose a direct threat to the U.S. The government argues that this threat justifies military force. However, many critics and legal experts point out that there is no proof of a direct threat to the US, thus no formal armed conflict, meaning these operations amount to illegally killings in international waters. At least 105 people have already been killed.

In fact, relatively few drugs come from Venezuela into the U.S. The synthetic opioid fentanyl causes the most fatalities in the US, but is mainly produced by Mexican cartels from Chinese raw materials, NOT Venezuelan cartels. The US seems to want to see leftist authoritarian leader Nicolás Maduro leave. Wth? So Trump is just like Putin attacking Ukraine?

[–] petrjanda@gonzo.markets 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It seems the whole point is to provoke Maduro to respond in order to escalate into a full blown conflict. Maduro needs to go but let's not forget about Cuba, the immoral embargo on the poor Carribbean country and what did it achieve ? Nothing, the regime hasn't changed. The reason is not drugs, the reason is oil. The trump administration thinks it owns Venezuelan oil and oil is all that Trump can think about.

[–] Puddinghelmet@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

So America ensures 'peace by enforcing it' (from the national security strategy) on Venezuela, why even have a democracy?

[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yes, Trump is exactly like Putin attacking Ukrain

[–] Puddinghelmet@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Putins wants Ukraine for resources and to have Zelensky out and is bombing them, America wants to bully Maduro out AND for the largest oil reservoir in the world in Venezuela so they also bomb them... Ok?

[–] zebidiah@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The only reason trump hasn't attacked Canada is because we are demographically uncooperative with standard US bombing campaigns....

[–] Alaik@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

Pretty sure its because you guys could fight back

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Alcohol and tobacco are by far the worst of any drugs ever created.

[–] Krono@lemmy.today 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There have been many studies on this subject (none in the US, since we are under strict prohibition). They calculate both harm to user and harm to society.

Almost all these studies are in agreement that there are three classes of 'hard' drugs that are significantly worse than the rest- opioids, amphetamines, and alcohol. Many rate alcohol as slightly more destructive than the other two.

Tobacco is rated significantly less harmful, mostly because of the amount of tobacco it takes to do harm. No one dies from a single night of heavy smoking; many people die from a single night of alcohol, amphetamines, or opiates. Second-hand smoke is dangerous, but not nearly as dangerous as a drunk driver.

Personally I think these studies underrate benzodiazipines, they should be considered the fourth class of hard drugs imo.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is a great response.

When harm to society is considered, does that include such things as health care, legal/criminal, and damages to property? Death would obviously be a more weigghted category.

The single use danger makes sense.

I wonder, is length of horrific suffering and toll it takes and trauma it leaves, a factor?

(My dad was a drinker, his many medical issues attributed to drinking were not much fun to witness over the 7 months I had to stay with them til he died.

I am not ok.)

[–] Krono@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sorry to hear about your father.

I believe the study considered everything you mentioned, you can see the categories in this graph:

PDF of the study is available: Drug harms in the UK: A multi-criterion decision analysis

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Thanks for these stats. Its nice to see actual data.

It's not exactly a revelation. Seeing the drugs that were all the rave in the 90s/00's at the bottom end of the data and remembering the UK gov and police going hard against the love, all the while docs are prescribing the worst and pubs are serving the king of the worst.

Also, Imagine if alcohol were illegal.

And thanks for the sentiment.

Its been years now but I still have flashbacks and it makes me want to drink. I don't drink, seing what it did to his body. He was otherwise an upstanding and very well respected member of community and society. He just liked his beer and whiskey at the end of the day. Every day.

Though I have done every other drug on that list aside from khat. I don't anymore.

Just the best 7 or 8 of them.

[–] MML@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Uh there's Krokodil (actually it turns out most of what you read is the production not the literal chemical desomorphine causing most of the issues you hear about)

[–] Puddinghelmet@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Also "relatively few drugs come from Venezuela into the U.S. The synthetic opioid fentanyl causes the most fatalities in the US, but is mainly produced by Mexican cartels from Chinese raw materials."

[–] BlackVenom@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] chunes@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In terms of mortality it's not even close. Alcohol alone kills nearly twice as many people as all other drugs combined.

Tobacco, 5x as many.

[–] nyctre@piefed.social 8 points 1 month ago

Sure, but isn't that just because anyone can buy them in the supermarket? Start selling opioids in the same way and I'm pretty sure those stats would change.

Is the AK-47 the worst weapon we've created just because it's killed the most people? I don't think that's how those stats are supposed to be used, imo.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

Trump is like Bush Jr attacking Iraq over some nonexistent "WMDs."

[–] Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

Because Trump wants to look just as tough guy as Putin. He needs to start a war which he can win.

[–] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 43 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

A dock? Such a rapey “just the tip,” approach. “Hey Venezuela, if you don’t fight back, it’ll hurt less.”

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 19 points 1 month ago

It's all he knows.

[–] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 39 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Here is a source from a media company that isn't the mouthpiece for DJT. That source has on the ground video footage in Venezuela. Fuck Trump, and fuck his entire administration.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 month ago

ABC isn't a government mouthpiece. I would trust the right-wing Telegraph even less.

[–] Insekticus@aussie.zone 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This regime is leaving a massive steaming pile of shit in its wake that it won't care about if it wins next election, or know the repercussions will absolutely savage the next democratic government into really hard positions to make reparations.

[–] n0respect@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I think they do know. They want it, because they want the US government to fail. If not from direct takeover, by the method you suggest

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 37 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Imo Maduro should cut a security deal with china and fuck up trump's whole game. I'm tired of this forever war bullshit over oil.

[–] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Many yankistanis are already gushing over this, if china gets involved, they would be signing up in droves to kill "communists" escalating things even more.

The rest of the west should be putting pressure against this, but they are proving themselves to be spineless once again.

[–] zebidiah@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Can you name a time "the west" wasn't spineless cowards?

... Asking for a Polish friend in 1939

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes, before the illegal immigrants in the big wooden boats showed up.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

The ones with guns looking to pay off debts?

[–] Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago

Better a one-time bang than constant whining.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I start a war, I ended that war. Where is my noble peace prize?! 🫲🍊🫱

[–] Puddinghelmet@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You get: mass strikes until the dissolution of the whole government. 🥳

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Rape some children then start a war to distract.

About as obvious as it gets.

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I hope he seriously overextends the military, and needs a draft. We will get to see how big and tough the MAGAs really are.

[–] eletes@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think it'd be a while before they did a draft. Money would be pumped into Palantir/Oracle/Lockheed/Raytheon first

[–] VoodooAardvark@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

That’s probably the plan.