this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2025
269 points (98.6% liked)

News

33796 readers
2407 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

For me, this is the most depressing part.

So many of the technically competent individuals I know are just gleefully throwing their competency and credibility into this ‘AI’ grift chipper with utter abandon.

I can’t see a viable path through it, and whenever they’ve articulated what they see on the other side, it is beyond repugnant and I truly don’t see any benefit in existing in that world if it ever manifests.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

We're cooked. Gotta fight back

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 44 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

That’s actually a pretty good idea. What if we started putting tech billionaires through the wood chipper? It could be like the American guillotine

[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 6 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

There's is nothing too awful to happen to sundar Prichai.

No horrible fate could befall that man that would not cause me delight.

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 10 points 8 hours ago

I’m imagining the next viral video trend on the order of “will it blend”.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 0 points 7 hours ago

Do they make a 2-stroke wood chipper? The planet can dank the damage and it’ll get the chuds on board /s

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 61 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

What do you call a private jet full of billionaires crashing into a mountain?

A good start.

[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

They’d never agree to share the jet.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 101 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

And just how are you suffering, Mr. Billionaire?

[–] unphazed@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

For the first time ever, his assets only warranted stealing 20 0% interest million dollar loans instead of hundreds. He's becoming a Poor!

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 21 points 10 hours ago

“I was only able to buy 2 yachts and one jet. Last year I got 4 yachts and 3 jets.”

[–] dnick@sh.itjust.works 8 points 9 hours ago

Well, can you imagine being given a million dollars and someone coming along and saying 'oh, sorry, you didn't withdraw that in time and now it's no longer there, and you owe use a $100 transaction fee'. That would really suck, wouldn't it?

Now imagine that happening 10 times a day, and you can start to imagine how horrible some of these billionaires feel every day!

Of course to make it more realistic, your job wouldn't require you to actually ever come into the office or do anything, they would occasionally double or triple your salary based on the stock market, and instead of it being a million dollars, it would be a dollar or so every once in awhile and you wouldn't know what the transaction fee was because it is effectively less than a rounding error on your current balance. Also banks will loan you money and just write it off if you don't pay it back with no impact to your credit score.

[–] JiveTurkey@lemmy.world 82 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

I think we can all agree, we should put people like this in the wood chipper and unboubtedly the world would be a better place.

[–] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 29 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

The billionaires want to build industrial wood-chippers to get rid of us en masse, meanwhile individual sized wood-chippers already exist.

[–] JiveTurkey@lemmy.world 9 points 11 hours ago
[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago (2 children)
[–] SARGE@startrek.website 6 points 10 hours ago

I've got about $100 I can afford to fund this endeavor.

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

I don't see a stat for how many billionaires it can shred per minute. Any idea?

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

Agree. AGREE?!
Well, firstly, I want to know are you a namby pamby "make it quick, put them head first in to the woodchipper" person.
Or a steely eyed "make the parasites suffer and go feet first and make them watch it happen" type.
If we are going to agree on anything then we need to agree on these fundamentals!!

[–] applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 28 minutes ago

Why don't we compromise and put them in arm first?

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I am for head first.
There is no benefit for other's suffering. Just make it quick.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 4 points 10 hours ago

That's one thing I really liked about the first John Wick movie. No drawn out revenge torture, just a quick bullet and walk out. No need to take some kind of sick pleasure in it, there's a job to be done.

Now that's not to say I won't enjoy some feel-good thoughts about the whole thing, but I just don't take pleasure in making a death slow and painful.

[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 hours ago
[–] dnick@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 hours ago

Head first, but the line up to the top has a really good view.

[–] markz@suppo.fi 114 points 13 hours ago

I'm sure he's suffering through it.

[–] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 15 points 9 hours ago

Not if the people trying to force it on us go in to the chipper first.

[–] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 8 points 8 hours ago

As long as the tech Bros and the CEOs suffer first and the most I'm okay with it.

[–] The_Blinding_Eyes@lemmy.world 37 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

This type of stuff is exactly why I am moving all of my accounts away from Google. Google is now as bad or evenworse than Microsoft.

[–] BaroqueInMind@piefed.social 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] rollerbang@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

For me - self-hosted.

[–] Mk23simp@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

That ascribes far too much agency to AI. It's people like him who are putting society through the woodchipper.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca -3 points 8 hours ago

It actually ascribes too much agency to individuals.

The technology is out there, there's no shoving this back in the box. No matter what individuals decide to do, only laws will regulate this, and only laws that can be enforced.

Even if the US decides "no AI" a bunch of other countries are going to laugh at them, and then use AI to beat America at pretty much anything that can take advantage of AI to improve it.

It would be no different than a country refusing to use electricity or automobiles.

[–] etchinghillside@reddthat.com 30 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Where is Alphabet at on creating robot infantry? Not sure if ads are going to save them from societal woodchipering:

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 22 points 12 hours ago

Google sold Boston Dynamics to Hyundai a few years ago. I wonder if they regret it...

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 12 points 11 hours ago

I'll suffer if he goes through the woodchipper

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 14 points 12 hours ago

2 steps ahead of you, boss. Locked and loaded ready for the Terminators already.

I’d love for him to have to suffer through… everything, really, if I’m being honest, given what he’s helping to do to humanity.

[–] Cnote5@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

I'm just giddy with excitement. /s

[–] TheJesusaurus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 hours ago

Nope. Not all