This is why unions are usually better, especially the trade unions.
Antiwork
Date Created: June 21, 2023
This community supports labor, with an aspiration for it to cease to be required to live our lives. Members of this community want to end work, are curious about ending work, want to get the most out of a work-free life, want more information on anti-work ideas and/or want personal help with their own jobs/work-related struggles.
Anti-Work Library π
Essential Reads
Start here! Some of the more talked-about essays on the topic.
- The Abolition of Work by Bob Black (1985) | listen
- On the Phenomenon of Bullshit Jobs by David Graeber (2013) | listen
- In Praise of Idleness by Bertrand Russell (1932) | listen

c/Antiwork Rules
Tap or click to expand
1. Server Main Rules
The main rules of the server will be enforced stringently. https://lemmy.world/
2. No spam or reposts + limit off topic comments
Spamming posts will be removed. Reposts will be removed with the exception of a repost becoming the main hub for discussion on that topic.
Off topic comments that do not pertain to the post at hand may be removed if it is deemed they contribute nothing and/or foster hostility at users. This mostly applies to political and religious debate, but can be applied to other things at the modβs discretion.
3. Post must have Antiwork/ Work Reform explicitly involved
Post must have Antiwork/Work Reform explicitly involved in some capacity. This can be talking about antiwork, work reform, laws, and ext.
4. Educate donβt attack
No mocking, demeaning, flamebaiting, purposeful antagonizing, trolling, hateful language, false accusation or allegation, or backseat moderating is allowed. Donβt resort to ad hominem attacks against another user or insult other people, examples of violations would be going after the person rather than the stance they take.
If we feel the comment is uncalled for we will remove it. Stay civil and there wonβt be problems.
5. No Advertising
Under no circumstance are you allowed to promote or advertise any product or service
6. No factually misleading information
Content that makes claims or implications that can be proven false or misleading will be removed.
7. Headlines
If the title of the post isnβt an original title of the article then the first thing in the body of the post should be an original title written in this format βOriginal title: {title here}β.
8. Staff Discretion
Staff can take disciplinary action on offenses not listed in the rules when a community member's actions or general conduct creates a negative experience for another player and/or the community.
It is impossible to list every example or variation of the rules. It is also impossible to word everything perfectly. Players are expected to understand the intent of the rules and not attempt to "toe the line" or use loopholes to get around the intent of the rule.
9. No posting links to Twitter/X or Meta owned properties
Social Media products such as Twitter/X and Meta Properties (e.g. Facebook, Instagram, Threads) are known low quality information sources - they actively spread misinformation without sufficient moderation, hate speech. These platforms each have billionaire owners working actively to eliminate labor protections through direct action, lobbying, performative large scale layoffs and attacks on institutions that enforce labor law.
You are not encouraged to do so, but you may post screenshots from these sites IF THE INFORMATION IS NOT AVAILABLE ON ANOTHER VALID PLATFORM. Screenshots must include info to support a relevant conversation within this community and must show a VISIBLE time/date stamp for posterity. If you are caught manipulating content of a screenshot, your post will be removed and you will receive an indefinite ban from this community at the discretion of the moderator(s)
No pass through/archive services are allowed as they potentially feed traffic back to these services, directly or indirectly (e.g. Services like Xcancel or Nitter)
Antiwork Suggested Communities
Server status for big servers http://lemmy-status.org/
Active stats from all Antiwork instances
When I transferred to a particular department, I was very open about salary. I never asked anyone else to be too, but it got people talking and a year later half my team quit to get a 25% salary increase at a competitor. Oopsie!
I donβt regret it. 10/10 Would do it again.
what's funny is that while the institutional gender pay disparity is mostly gone (at least where i work) - there's still a couple of dozen ways women get screwed out of money for doing the same work.
my favorite case from this year was with data engineer position - simple middle level position Pandas Airflow Databricks stack, 3k median. two candidates hired - same skill level, salary - male 3,5k, females 2,7k - why? if you look strictly at the skill assessment reports - you wouldn't even be able to tell where is who. so what the fuck is going on? well, if you look at the HR report - dude been showboating and oversharing about his skills all the way for the ladies and that's good thing that should be rewarded while the lady just laid down the facts as she was asked during the interviews and was deemed distant and not very personable, "she doesn't seem happy to be here" so to speak therefore she is not that good. fucking literally. and then the very same recruitment and human resources specialists wonder why people leave.
Definitely don't disagree with the feeeeemale in the meme but also:

Also it's illegal for them to stop you, talk away.
https://www.nlrb.gov/about-nlrb/rights-we-protect/your-rights/your-rights-to-discuss-wages
Out of college, I got my first job at a decent salary. A woman I interviewed with saw the salary offer they gave me, and then promptly went to HR to demand that she at least make as much as I was offered. She had been at this company for 3 years. It shouldn't be this hard. Women shouldn't have to fight to make as much as men. Normalize discussing salary.
Socialize the information
I was pulled into a meeting with my director and told we're not allowed to do this. I told her it absolutely was allowed under the law and she looked me in the eye and doubled down, stated that it has been like this at every company she's ever worked at.
My complaint to HR resulted in the HR person telling me that while it wasn't allowed, it was discouraged; which is also against the law.
My ethics report on both of them was "investigated and concluded".
My call to the NLRB resulted in an overworked federal employee telling me I could make a complaint but it was unlikely to amount to anything against a company that size.
The rule with discussing salaries is that you can do it (and you should do it), but you shouldn't let your managers know you're doing it. The law is on your side, but nobody with actual authority wants to support you doing it.
So, if you're on your way out in a contested wrongful termination case, there's definitely leverage in pointing to your employer firing you for discussing salaries with your coworkers. But in every other case, you gotta play those cards close to the chest. Nod and smile and agree with every manager who says you shouldn't discuss salaries. Then do as thou wilt.
I was one of 3 people aty office who got any sort of raise this year. It was based on merit. I'm thrilled about the raise, but I feel bad for my coworkers because management sucks. I discussed the raise with my work besties and one is pissed about it and the other is hyped for me.
I'm also faced with the dilemma of being important at work.
Being important can be tricky.
I work in a very small city, and I wear a lot of hats. I do plan review, permit processing, GIS, Open Records, vested rights determinations, some code enforcement, am the in-house IT guy, city photographer, and more.
What makes me valuable is my ability to multitask, and if I left it would be very hard to fill all those roles. But I'm also kinda a specialist in keeping plates spinning. My role is essential where I am now, but it's fulfilled my specialists in each of those duties in other cities. My skills etc isn't in high demand because there's only a few cities in the country that have the the extreme development complexity we have while also having a municipal staff of fewer than a dozen people due to the city's size.
In the same way, I discovered that everyone got paid. Except me. For a month. I left the job, best decision ever made.
Yep, that's why companies try so hard to intimidate people into keeping that info secret. I think most if not every company I've ever worked for has had some version of
- It's against company policy
- It's illegal
- It will just create jealousy
And of course, my responses have always been
- Too bad, it's federally protected
- Liar
- No, your payroll policies do that; same job, same pay
I used to work at a shitty company that banned discussing salaries. I never thought anything about it because it was a call center and I just kinda assumed we had standardised salary across the board. One time when having drinks at a friend's house who worked with me but had a higher position, I found his payslip lying around and I was making, I shit you not, about 70% more. Fucking hell.
I hope you told them when you left
Serious question: how do you start that conversation with a coworker if you're not 100% certain they'll be receptive?
"can you believe they only pay us X to do this shit?"
As someone who detests small talk, this is one of the few times when it is essentially.
First step is learning if they are a snitch. Second is seeing if they can be critical of workplace. Third is bringing up your own salary. Fourth is asking for theirs if they don't immediately reciprocate on step 3.
In practice there are many ways this can happen. Here is one reasonable example:
Did you see the bosses [insert anything, tie, shoes, car, your pick] today. OmG!
[Wait a day or two for any sign that made it back to your boss. Prepare a convincing cover up story in the event he/she/it is a snitch.]
2-4
Our health insurance is terrible isnt it? I swear its like they pick the cheapest option. [Replace the above with any other unpopular opinion depending on how critical the response is of your workplace you can jump immediately to steps 3-4]
I heard a lot of employers like to pay people differently for the exact same work and I dont think thats right. Thats why I want you to know I make Y. If you make less I can help you argue for more. Do you mind sharing your salary too?
You can sometimes just jump straight to step 3 or 4 if you are feeling confident. But do be aware. You can save someone's job and the boss will corner them in an office and some of them will still rat you out. Happened to me personally. The above isnt without risk. But do not be afraid of humans, especially middle management humans. They are usually the weakest people I've ever met.
When you're running a place I want to work for you
In the US, not only is it completely legal to openly discuss compensation with anyone you like, it is also illegal for your employer to tell you not to, or to retaliate against you for doing so. It is a highly protected activity.
If youβre in an at-will state, they can fire you this without saying this is why, and itβs very hard to prove this was why.
Montana is the only state where an employer needs "good cause" to terminate.
Though everywhere I have ever worked (in tech, in the US) it was highly discouraged to talk about salary.
Weβve been programmed to consider it rude to encroach the subject.
Ironically, the public sector makes salaries available to everyone to view.
Now you know that that is illegal.
Employers have all the power, though. It is they who may reliably hide behind the law for protection. Laws that protect employees are rare to be passed and rarer to be enforced.
You're not wrong, but it's worth contacting DoL if you need to on this one.
Worked for a payroll firm and 99.75% of lemmy would be astonished at how powerful the state labor board is. And this was in Florida! Hardly a bastion of labor rights.
"waGe TheFT!"
"Have you called the state labor board and inquired?"
"NOAWW! I'm a victim and I make memes!"
Only our worst client, and only 1, wasn't scared shitless of a call from the state labor folks. And these clients were rock-bottom, minimum-wage employers like restaurants, churches and thrift stores. Part of our payroll service was protecting the employer from fucking over the employees!
While I'm on about knowing your rights, a $26 legal insurance plan can save you 10's of thousands with a single use. I call mine every few months.
"Can they do this? What about this? What are my rights? What if I do this thing? What form do I fill out and how?!" Mostly super-simple stuff, but my divorce and child custody cases alone saved me far than I will spend in the next 40 years.
The difference between rich and poor is legal representation. $26/mo.
I am terrified everyone in this community doesn't comprehend the actual problem.
If you're working for a salary, you have already been robbed.
Ah yes, Marxism. Never fails to deliver interesting but impractical concepts about value creation.
Dividends are impractical?
Is that what they taught you at the NYSE?
Unethical LPT: tell the colleague you find most difficult to work with, that you make far more money than you do. If they succeed in getting a raise, youβll have an easier time getting one, too. If they fail, you know not to bother, and the difficult person will likely leave or be fired soon.
If they succeed in getting a raise
How are you supposed to know if this is the case? Just hope they tell you?
Just hope they tell you?
No, no. That is too unreliable. You can tell whether they got a raise by the odor of their farts. Itβs unmistakable.
What? Hahahaha
Seriously discuss salaries. My coworker was making half of what I was making for doing the same job.
I have several stories on this I like to tell.
I worked at a startup in NYC that was doing job-search related stuff. Find job postings, get resume advice, that kind of stuff. Someone in the customer service department found an article online about salaries, shared it, and then people were talking about how much they got paid. Management came down hard on this, and said it was a fireable offense to talk about salary. Everyone got real quiet on the topic after that. Was it illegal for them to do that? Maybe! But laws only matter when they're enforced, and a bunch of entry level people making $30-50k a year don't have the means to launch a legal challenge. That's even if there's enough solidarity to try, and the effort won't be scuttled by scabs and bootlickers.
For extra irony, a couple years later the company launched an "Are you getting paid enough?" salary comparison tool.
I worked at a different startup in NYC. This one loved data. Data data data. They had t-shirts made that said stuff like "Data doesn't care about your feelings" or whatever.
People started agitating about salary transparency. They wanted to know how much people were being made, because there was a sense that not everyone was getting paid the same for the same work. Also, some of us had in secret started comparing notes, and found some wide gaps.
Well, the CEO wasn't having it. He said "we have salary bands", but wouldn't provide more detail on the range of the bands, who was in what band, and how it all worked. Just we have salary bands and they're fair.
People didn't like that, so he tried changing tactics. He said, "Who here thinks they're being paid too much money? No one? No one wants a pay cut. Right. So that's why we're not going to release the specifics." As if the only solution to Amy being paid too little is to lower Bob's pay.
This is the same CEO, at the same "we love data" company, that when people brought up studies about four day workweeks being more effective, just shut it down with "We're not doing that."
Management and ownership don't care. They don't care about what's legal or just. They care about power, and profit as a close second. I knew a guy that worked in a factory, and the owner reportedly would say stuff like "If you assholes unionize I will burn this place to the ground, and I don't care if you're inside or not."
There need to be institutions, with teeth, to stop these kinds of things. If ownership even whispers an anti-union sentiment, they should lose everything.
I did this once for an executive assistant. A few months after I was hired me and the assistant were talking and I told her how much I made because i was excited (it was a lot for me at the time). She mentioned she made like half the amount and had worked for 20 years for the company. I coached her on how to ask for a raise and showed her all the other people in the area making more than her and with that ammo she went and got a huuuuuuge raise. I was so happy for her.
Always talk about how much you make. The only reason it's a taboo is because the owner class don't want us to know how much everyone else makes because it's easier to rip people off when they're ignorant. Especially people who are mild mannered since they might not ask as many questions or fight back against pushback.
sometimes it doesn't even benefit the company
as an example, I used to be partially responsible for my team's hourly rates. we hired a proper manager though, and I am no longer responsible for that, and seemingly no longer even involved in that discussion.
as a result, I don't know what some of my team members are paid, which means that I don't know how to properly evaluate them and set expectations for their work output. if somebody is making $5 less an hour than somebody else, I'm going to expect less work product from them, and judge them according to that expectation. but I can't do that without knowing their wage.
America seems strange for this salary secrecy and individual negotiations. But in my work place in the UK, a group is negotiating higher salaries, and another group (unaffected) is actively talking shit about them and trying to undermine their efforts. This other group speaks of how terrible it is to affect a multimillion Β£ organisation to strain its finances. Workers holding back other workers is complete bullshit.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crab_mentality
Crab mentality, also known as crab theory, crabs in a bucket mentality, or the crab-bucket effect, describes the mindset of people who try to prevent others from gaining a favorable position, even if attaining such position would not directly impact those trying to stop them. It is usually summarized with the phrase: "If I can't have it, neither can you".
Assuming your manager has the authority to increase your salary. Iβm a manager and have 0 power in any say and very limited in what I can do. Iβm just paid to babysit my staff to make sure the job is jobbing.
It's all relative. Is your manager trying to get you a raise? Or, are they getting a bonus by denying you one? If you aren't sure, maybe it's the latter.
Same. You gotta go like 2-3 levels up in management to get someone with authority to raise wages. I think it's by design at this point.
100% by design. I know people who will say "but my manager can't get me it" as reasoning. Which is strictly correct but also like, man.
Discussing wages is constructive in general, but I am afraid many workplaces remain lacking in adequate solidarity for the tactic to be successful.
Beware of those who will try to bring down others instead of helping to lift everyone together.
I always talk salary with coworkers, but I've discovered that it can occasionally be a liability as some people lack class solidarity and lean into resentment before considering collaboration. Do talk salary, but look before you leap. Reach out the the coworkers you know you can trust first.