this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2025
669 points (98.3% liked)

Political Memes

2041 readers
676 users here now

Non political memes: !memes@sopuli.xyz

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 3 points 55 minutes ago

Food insecurity isn't always about lack of food, more like lack of logistics.

[–] discocactus@lemmy.world 1 points 29 minutes ago

I call it The Treadmill. If you're white, able-bodied, educated, motivated to play the game, etc. you can keep from falling off with what feels more or less like an easy walk. Until they speed it up. Or you get sick. Or stop playing the game.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 hour ago

All that old growth wood furniture.... It always makes me so sad knowing that it's essentially a semi non-renewable resource

[–] Semester3383@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I live in a very, very rural part of the country. Land is CHEAP; you can buy 100+ acres of forest for under $2000/acre. There are a lot of vacant houses. Why? Because no one wants to live here. (Obviously not no one, since I chose to move here, but still.) There aren't jobs locally; part of the price I pay for living where I want to live is spending 3+ hours in a car commuting each day. The vacant houses are vacant because the people that lived there either died, or moved because they couldn't get work. They're not vacant because some venture capital real estate company is buying up rural homes just to hold on to them as they rot away.

The issue isn't vacant housing; the issue is where the housing is, and whether it's actually habitable or not.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Can you live on that land without having to pay taxes or anything?

Because in my country, any cheap land in a place with no employment isn't viable due to needing employment to maintain 'ownership' of the land through fees to the state.

Also even if the issue is location, there is huge amounts of abandoned empty housing in cities with jobs. Squatters are constantly trying to live in such places and getting chased out by cops.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 3 points 1 hour ago

You have found the rub, there is always taxes. The issue is you need internet or local jobs and guess what outside of starmlink there was nothing in the places you can afford. The extra fun part is there are people who move to low COL areas after selling their property when retiring just to make it work. This is a reason that these locations sometimes have a lot of elderly people. Now the real fucked up part is that even this strange retirement tactic does not work if you never are able to buy a place.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 1 points 4 hours ago

It's fueled by greed and the desire to control others.

[–] AppleTea@lemmy.zip 5 points 9 hours ago

how much food gets thrown away just because it isn't picturesque?

I've tried growing tomatoes, and bub let me tell you, they look nothing like the pristine samples you find in grocery stores

[–] Saprophyte@lemmy.world 13 points 14 hours ago

https://www.misfitsmarket.com/

Buy food that was rejected because of its appearance. It's super cheap, it slows food waste, and it helps out a small company.

[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I hate it here. We have answers to all of life's problems, and yet we humans continue to choose the hard way.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Because the rich will lose profits, greed is the corruption we deal with. Enough is never enough.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 1 points 7 hours ago

It’s infuriating because we out number them to such a scale that it’s not funny, but so many of us are trapped into the system that they would never dare do anything about it.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 14 points 21 hours ago

What’s also weird is that if you want to get rid of perfectly good things nobody wants it or anyplace that might be able to use it makes it prohibitively difficult to get it to them. Got a functional fridge? Sure, you haul it out of your house, rent a truck, take it to the receiver - oh, and it can’t be more than 10 years old.

I find these posts that complain about waste kinda performative. While they’re not wrong, they ignore the logistical issues, both deliberate and indirect, of getting those things to the people that actually need them.

FWIW I’ve found that putting a “curb alert” for free good items with pictures and a location works pretty well. Some industrious person will usually pick something decent up 75% of the time.

[–] solidheron@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

We should be intercepting the landfill

[–] discocactus@lemmy.world 1 points 33 minutes ago

dumpster diving is a thing. food not bombs.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

Capitalism working as designed

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 98 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

The liars who pushed “there isn’t enough for everyone” aren’t pushing it much anymore. They’ve moved on to saying “not everyone deserves basic human needs”—which is what they really thought all along.

[–] state_electrician@discuss.tchncs.de 41 points 1 day ago (11 children)

If you cannot pay for it, you don't deserve it. The basic tenet of capitalism.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] for_some_delta@beehaw.org 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The abundence argument seems written by people who do not produce anything.

I don't think abundence arguments help the left. I raise fruit. I lose fruit to animals and weather. There is variability in the amount of fruit I produce. I often produce more than I can consume, but the logistics of getting the fruit to someone else doesn't work out and the fruit rots. Some years I lose my fruit blossoms to frost.

I have family that work potatoes for a commercial operation. There were a bunch of potatoes that were too big to sell commercially. The operation left the potatoes to rot in the field. My relative bagged potatoes and brought them to family in the old gift economy fashion.

What is the abundence economy argument really about? Are you going to buy bird pecked fruit or C'thulu looking potatoes? Country folk trim off the bad spots. City folk often haven't gotten their hands dirty.

I'm all for anarchy and communism. That means doing some real work and not just reaping the surpluses of capitalism. Chop some wood, it'll do you good and be a good neighbor.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 3 points 19 hours ago

Yeah, you want waste in the food system.

If you don't have waste in a good year, you'll have famine in a bad year.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Because the two thousand child raping and killing men who rule over us have deemed it so

We produce enough food to feed everyone, it's just that it's not profitable to do so because the rich are greedy ghouls.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Capitalism depends on violence and deprivation to keep labor desperate and exploitable.

[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 1 points 39 minutes ago

Maybe, but violence and deprivation existed long before any systems of logistical distribution or sales. Early capitalism solved some of those issues. But we're in late stage capitalism now.

load more comments
view more: next ›