this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2025
1145 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

78029 readers
3350 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 80 points 1 day ago (4 children)

As far as I’ve read, the database is largely low bitrate files, and some AI. The value here is metadata and preservation of “rare” music.

[–] hietsu@sopuli.xyz 47 points 1 day ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Nope, I would not call 160kbps Vorbis low bitrate, it’s roughly quality of 192kbps MP3. Only the ”popularity=0” stuff (so stuff with so few listens that Spotify does not keep record of) were re-encoded to 75kbps Opus, which as a modern codec is much better than it sounds like but of course re-encode is not great for already lossy stuff.

For purists there are those Tidal downloader sites available everywhere for free lossless music, even 24-bit hires FLAC.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GraveyardOrbit@lemmy.zip 74 points 1 day ago

All tracks within the top 99.6% of listens are supposed to be high quality

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RabbitBBQ@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's nothing compared to my old Napster collection

[–] SeventySeven@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Datahoarders are going to go WILD over this

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] planish@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

Sounds more like the pirate queen.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 51 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Is this new? Aren't most tracks already available in torrents?

[–] JASN_DE@feddit.org 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's new insofar as this is one big scrape. About 300TB iirc.

[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (9 children)

300tb is a lot, but its kind of crazy to think this entire company only needs 300tb storage arrays to function. I wonder how they handle things internally. I would imagine at least 1 backup server ready to go in HA. I wonder if they have multiple regions across the country that also serves up the same setup.

[–] capuccino@lemmy.world 50 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They need other 300TB to store all the ads.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rainwall@piefed.social 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Likely cloned Netflix's "netflix in a box" design, where they drop a large 200TB+ NAS in thousands of different CDN datecenters with their most popular content cached so that total traffic is minimal across the internet at large.

Spotify mainly being music with very little video likely makes this even easier.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ZombieCyborgFromOuterSpace@piefed.ca 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Let's put it all on a Funkwhale server.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] ZombieCyborgFromOuterSpace@piefed.ca 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Dang. You called me out on my bullshit.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 19 points 1 day ago (11 children)

I wish I could think anything positive about this, but I can't imagine anyone who actually cares about music needs or wants this. Instead it'll almost certainly be used as an illegal and unethical dataset to further train bullshit AI to make slop songs. As easy as it is for people to claim "preservation", I do have to question the motives of stuff like this...

Fuck AI. Support your favorite human artists.

[–] Seasm0ke@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

I mean, it seems like the perfect avenue to replicate Stremio / Kodi but for music

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Wasn’t all of this shit already available as torrents?

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 19 points 1 day ago (4 children)

You could hand pluck grains of rice out of a field or just steal a 25lb bag.

Which would you prefer?

[–] Azzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

In case of this, definitely the grains.

Most of this rice is not worth stealing :D

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

No.

Not everything got torrented after music streamers came into prominence. (Though chances are pretty good you could rip an MP3 off Youtube for whatever you're looking for.)

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 11 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Ripping Mp3s off YouTube Music Videos is without a doubt the worst method of piracy I've ever heard of.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›