this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2025
31 points (91.9% liked)

LEGO

4935 readers
4 users here now

Show off your Lego, discuss your MOC's and builds, and talk news and upcoming sets here!

Rules

1 No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.

2 Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.

3 No porn.

4 No Ads / Spamming.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I have pieces from original sets, but there are also many imitations, such as Chinese sets, which were bought for me as a child, because small Lego sets used to be very expensive at that time, while large craft sets were cheaper.

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

You know what's funny, is I think the face printing and logo on the slope piece are actually Lego decals from Classic Space

[–] despoticruin@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Honestly, with the price of lego and their own deviation from the "Lego" aesthetic in recent years I wouldn't fault anyone for sticking with the clones. I have used quite a few of the "compatible" sets from China and other than the logo on top of the studs they are identical. Even the colors are on point these days.

[–] Blaze@piefed.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Any clone brands you recommend ?

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago

I would think the issue would be for obviously non-lego pieces. Not knockoff stuff, but like, K'Nex or something clearly not interoperable.

I wouldn't clock any of the pieces in that picture as non-standard, personally.