The Streisand Effect sends its regards.
this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2025
565 points (99.6% liked)
News
35749 readers
2245 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Yes, but also... this is a kinda unique variation in that it wasn't already public when they tried to kill it.
... and, I'm not sure who "archivists" might refer to but I suspect that whoever they are may have undertaken significant risk.
The article says it was released online and if you were in Canada you could watch it. Also it doesn't say it here but another news source said the week prior it was advertised through commercials, ads, and online that it would be airing on so and so date and time.
Once I saw who stopped it, I kept thinking back to John Oliver's episode on her a few months ago and thought wow that didnt take long.
If it was posted ~~in Canada~~ anywhere it was posted everywhere. Thus is the nature of the internet.
Sounds like an "international distributor" aired the episode, so it was already public, at least in whatever country it aired in. The only risk they took is perhaps getting their "international distribution" contract cancelled.
If it aired publicly, and nobody involved in the distribution is involved in the "archiving", there may be very little that can be done about it, short of sending the USS Trump to carpetbomb their country.
Valid point, but maybe a little less unique than it seems, at least if you look at the original Barbra Streisand situation. The photo of her house was originally so obscure and hidden that realistically essentially nobody had ever seen it, until she sued the photographer to have it removed. While it was technically "publicly available" before that it was in such an obscure dataset of coastal erosion examples that it had only been downloaded 6 times, which in terms of being "public on the internet", effectively rounds down to zero.
And those 6 times it were said to be her lawyer who viewed them.
I believe the archivists are data hoarders aka pirates.
And so they're outside the USA.
Actually since my comment it's become clear that the show was aired in canada.
When I posted that comment it sounded like the show had been canned but someone on the production team had leaked it.
I don't watch 60 Minutes but I watched this episode.
“Tell Bari Weiss. I want her to know it was me.”
If you'd like a 🧲:
magnet:?xt=urn:btih:r26oym3csssgcjov7tfnlxls6m6c6ckn&dn=60minutes-cecotsegment&tr=http%3A%2F%2Fbt1.archive.org%3A6969%2Fannounce
Seems like a perfect video for Peertube.
That'll ensure nobody sees it.
It will be more than how many people will see it by being just a torrent.
If it's on peertube, you can just send a link to people and it'll stream right on the browser (granted it has enough peers which I'm pretty sure it will).
Nah, nah, someone does.
...surely. Someone does, anybody?
They always need more content. This would be a great addition.
“Goverment silence is a statement, not a VETO. Their refusal to be interviewed is a tactical maneuver designed to kill the story,”…
Couldn’t have said it better myself.
Bari Weiss Killed
damn i gotta stop reading headlines right to left
If she gets more people to watch 60 minutes, has she not done her job? 😂
They're not watching 60 minutes. They're watching a story elsewhere that 60 Minutes didn't want to air. So basically 60 Minutes did all the work and gets none of the rewards here. They don't get the ratings they don't get the eyes and they don't get the advertising dollars.
Advertising and ratings are toxic metrics to bind journalism to.
The proper way to proceed is to build systems and infrastructure that replace these vacuous incentives.
But that's what pays for the content in our current system. Publicly funded journalism is my preference but the problem is some governments bend those to their will and we don't get true reporting. I agree with you that advertisers metrics are bullshit and we should do better but I just don't see where we can go.
Get fucked Bari!
This is the best advertizing they can get to spread it wide and far.
Bwahaha. Love it. More of this!
Where can I find it? They put so much effort into hiding it. Gotta watch it
Posted to YouTube a few hours ago, by the office of New Jersey senator Cory Booker:
Make it famous!