this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2025
161 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

77795 readers
2290 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] b_tr3e@feddit.org 17 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

building the taskbar from scratch meant that they had to cherry-pick things to put into the feature list first, and the ability to move the taskbar didn’t make the cut, for several reasons that Microsoft values.

Translation: Nobody really knows (or wants to take the blame), we probably just forgot to put on the feature list. Anyway, I'll just use the usual vague weasel-words that don't really mean anything.

[–] Bluefruit@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago

"Window's is built on many layers of shit and we dont know what will or won't break things.

Also co pilot was really expensive"

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 hour ago

Is this what hearing Vogon Poetry is like?

[–] Rooty@lemmy.world 1 points 37 minutes ago (1 children)

Honestly, at this point Microsoft should do what Apple did, and build a completely new OS on top of the BSD kernel.

[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 2 points 32 minutes ago (1 children)

Or just Linux. Why even bother with BSD?

[–] Rooty@lemmy.world 1 points 10 minutes ago (1 children)

Because they would (for some reason) never open their source code.

[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 1 points 8 minutes ago

They only need to open source the kernel. They can build whatever proprietary stuff they want on top of the Linux kernel.

[–] xeekei@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 hours ago

This almost makes me want to move my panel in Plasma just because I can.

[–] SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 hours ago

If it takes so much effort to move the taskbar, why did it need to be fully rewritten in react native when everything worked before?

[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Microsoft UI "designers" need to be beaten with frozen braids of 3 foot long licorice ropes.

[–] yetAnotherUser@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 hours ago

It really seems like Windows really needs KDE to come back to the platform...

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 16 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Tali Roth, the then product manager working on the core Windows user experience, including the Start menu, taskbar, and notifications, took up the question and talked about how building the taskbar from scratch meant that they had to cherry-pick things to put into the feature list first, and the ability to move the taskbar didn’t make the cut, for several reasons that Microsoft values.

WHY WOULD YOU DO THAT?!

If you have working code, why would you rewrite it from scratch? Refactor, sure. Overhaul, maybe. But why rewrite the whole thing?! You're gaining nothing but unnecessary bugs.

I know all the joke answers. To justify a product manager's salary, because Microsoft gonna Microsoft, whatever. I want to know the real reason. Why would you ever rewrite working code from scratch if you don't have to?

[–] BuckenBerry@lemmy.world 1 points 16 minutes ago* (last edited 15 minutes ago)

I assume the code was just too old and convoluted to maintain properly. I'm a bad coder so I've definitely redone parts of my scripts from scratch rather than trying to refactor them.

Then again I'm not a small billion dollar indie company who's main focuses are spying on users and helping to commit genocide.

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 9 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Probably to add something terrible for the user but good for MS. Ad integration? Easier to spy?

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

That's fair, but even with that, it's got to be easier to shove it into existing code. Especially if you're trying to do it in a way that people don't notice!

And actually, the Windows 10 start menu infamously had ads, too. So it can't be that.

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 hours ago

Could be that refactoring the code for Windows 11 compatibility, and new features, would have been roughly equivalent in effort to rebuilding. If the code has been poked and probed for years already, still follows old patterns, and have devolved into a tightly coupled mess of scattered system dependancies… maybe it just becomes easier to justify rebuilding it as a way of clearing out technical debt?

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 39 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Microsoft’s data shows such users are really small when compared to the number of users who are asking for other newer features in the taskbar.

Asking for things like AI integration everywhere?

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 15 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Wouldn't it be cool if you could have AI on the desktop clock so you could ask it what time it was in different places in the world?

[–] Rooty@lemmy.world 1 points 29 minutes ago
[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 12 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I was going to make a joke that they could also replace the taskbar search bar with an AI chat bar, but after reading the article, it turns out that they're planning on doing that for real:

Windows 11 taskbar is now being “upgraded” with AI-first features. Microsoft is working on the Ask Copilot bar, which may replace Windows Search in the taskbar.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 hours ago

Your best sarcastic self is prime Microsoft material.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 25 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Let’s be real, it’s because it makes it easier to train AIs on the Recall screenshots if it always has the taskbar in the same position as a reference context

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago

Four years ago, Recall wasn't a thing. Microsoft was caught as off-guard by the AI hype machine as the rest of us. So I doubt this was originally the reason.

Might be now, though.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

This is such a weird take. Recall wasn’t even a glimmer in M$’s eye when this limitation was introduced. And it would take virtually nothing to add positions to the training, never mind the fact that they could just completely ignore the taskbar since the OS always knows where it is.

[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Further the containers contain the info, so the position on the users' screen is rather irrelevant.

[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 11 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

No exaggeration, this was my breaking point for switching to linux exclusively.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 21 points 6 hours ago

My wife was given a new work computer. Windows 11 and not enough RAM. She has been finding a new reason to hate it nearly every day, starting with how every change made to windows has fucked up her workflow in some way.

Me just nodding in acknowledgement as my little Dell Inspiron 15 purs along on Mint with Cinnamon.

[–] Janx@piefed.social 23 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

"We specifically made the product worse, because that saves us money we don't need and gives us additional control over users' computers, since so many are locked into our ecosystem."

Seriously, read the article. That's basically it!

[–] b_tr3e@feddit.org 1 points 2 hours ago

I think you're overinterpreting a bit. Actually the MS-droid doesn't really say anything. Just that the taskbar is not movable. Which was exactly the question.Typical evasion strategy.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 92 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (6 children)

In Windows 10, you could move it to the top, left, or right of the screen.

In every version of Windows up until now which has contained a taskbar and start menu, as far back as Windows 95. Not just Windows 10. Let's not sell short the full extent idiocy on display, here.

"Pouring its engineering resources," my ass.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 1 points 40 minutes ago

In every version of Windows up until now which has contained a taskbar and start menu, as far back as Windows 95. Not just Windows 10.

Sadly not true. Microsoft removed the Start button in a version of Windows before. It was in Windows 8 (and Windows Server 2012 for some godforsaken reason) with the cursed "metro" interface. MS did it for the same stupid reason they're citing here "tablet and touchscreen users". The uproar caused MS to release Windows 8.1 a year later where they returned the Start button.

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 27 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

In the launch version of windows 11 and for over TWO YEARS it didn't even support drag&drop. It was working fine even on windows me

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 18 points 6 hours ago

Drag and drop worked on windows 3.1. That was like the whole thing. "LOOK WHAT YOU CAN DO NOW!"

At this point, I'm fairly sure pissing people off is the point with Windows 11. It's full of AI no one wants, refuses to officially run on most hardware that people already have, despite running just fine on that same hardware UNofficially, dropped support for drag and drop, doesn't let you move the taskbar.

And thats not even to mention the fact that it monitors you, and reports back to HQ with screen grabs and usage activity.

Oh look, ZorinOS, just one singular distro, had 1.6 million downloads in the past 2 months.

Wait, is there any special thing that happened 2 months ago? Oh right. Windows 10 support ended, and microsoft told its userbase "fuck you, you can't get support for windows 10, and this computer can't update to windows 11. This computer is now trash!"

Suddenly all these youtube videos pop up "Is your PC unable to install windows 11? Try linux!"

And these videos don't try to sway you to one distro or another. They point out a few big hitters like mint or ubuntu. I can't imagine them specifically naming zorin, unless it's a zorin centric video. But I'm talking about the flood of "try linux" videos that popped up in October.

And that 1.6 million is JUST zorin. That's the runoff. I don't have numbers, or sources, but gut instinct tells me that if Zorin had 1.6 million downloads, Mint must have had like 5 million minimum. Every video always reccomends Mint. It's probably overtaken Ubuntu at some point as most used distro.

And all of this, every single bit of user loss has NOTHING to do with linux. Users are angrily switching. Not happily. They feel abandoned, and forced to switch.

If Microsoft either extended Windows 10 support, or allowed Windows 11 to be installed on reasonable hardware, this linux boom DOES NOT HAPPEN. This is Microsoft saying "Yeah bitch, money is tight! Go buy another computer, loser! You'll do what we say, and there's nothing you can do to stop us!"

That's when users switched to linux. This is pure hubris from Microsoft. It would be interesting if somehow we could get a combined number of EVERY distros doenload numbers.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] TootSweet@lemmy.world 172 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Because fuck you, that's why.

  • Microsoft

Saved you a click.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zak@lemmy.world 37 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

The bit about apps having to reflow seems nonsensical. They have to reflow any time the user resizes their windows.

I'm not accepting any excuses from MS about limited resources when Linux desktop environments built by hobbyists have the feature in question.

[–] Undearius@lemmy.ca 22 points 7 hours ago

They have to reflow any time the user resizes their windows.

The whole operating system is even named after that concept.

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 8 points 6 hours ago

Yeah, sounds like bullshit. I don't even see why that particular concern would create more work on the OS's part.

If an application fits "wonderfully" into the space it's given, Windows did nothing but telling it the dimensions it needs to fill. And as you said those dimensions can vary wildly.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FireWire400@lemmy.world 33 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (4 children)

I'd guess it's for the same reasons why we can't have a local account

it’s safe to assume that the company isn’t interested in pouring its engineering resources into pursuing something that won’t benefit a majority of users

I mean, they could just let their awesome Copilot vibe code it, couldn't they? Another reasons why I love being on Linux; you can do whatever even it it doesn't make sense to the majority of users.

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 6 hours ago

Like half of open source is just devs trying to satisfy their very specific needs

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 39 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

When you think about having the taskbar on the right or the left, all of a sudden the reflow and the work that all of the apps have to do to be able to have a wonderful experience in those environments is just huge

It was working fine in windows 95. Suddenly all programmers became incompetent and can't handle something like that?

[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 16 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

This makes no sense to me what so ever. Why do any apps care about where the taskbar is? How's it any different when a window isn't maximised and the user resizes it? Either I'm seriously misunderstanding this or it's a completely made up excuse.

I'd rather they just say "we completely rewrote the taskbar, but we know that less than 0.01% of users move their taskbar so we didn't prioritize it".

To me the bigger issue with the taskbar is that you can't make it compact. Instead it has to be a big chunky mess.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

https://www.stardock.com/products/start11/

Costs money but works with only minor quirks when switching between iGPU and dGPU.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

just saying, if I have to install some sketchy software to restore functionality that has existed on the platform flawlessly for almost four decades then it's not a viable platform anymore.

[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 57 points 9 hours ago (13 children)

Microsoft applied a data-driven approach to find out which features to add now, which features to add later, and which to completely avoid.

WHAT DATA?!

[–] pulsey@feddit.org 51 points 9 hours ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] andyburke@fedia.io 33 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Please, consider trying out linux if you haven't: you can usually make a "live usb" and take it for a test drive without having to actually reinstall (if you don't like it, just take the usb stick out and reboot back to windows).

I would dearly love to never again have to hear about the latest bullshit Microsoft is foisting on people.

Do your part! Switch. Everything just works better over here.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›