this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2025
40 points (100.0% liked)

World News

51361 readers
2127 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] randomaside@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 hours ago

Its basically illegal to be young. I don't think this is going to change anything. Kids are on the internet because they cant legally express being anything but a minor until they're a third through their life. They're constantly monitored, censored, and scrutinized. I think large tech corps are exploiting a real need kids have to participate. Sometimes ::tin foil hat:: I believe this is by design. Thanks for coming to my tedx talk.

[–] low@lemmy.today 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I started using social media when I was around 12 and I can say with confidence it brought me significantly more harm than good.

For those opposed: should we let them have cigarettes as well?

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 1 points 12 minutes ago

Fuck off nazi

[–] MonkeyDumpster@lemmy.org 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not a teenager but getting off Instagram and twitter has been amazing for my wellbeing

[–] non_burglar@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

That's all well and good, but getting kids off those platforms is neither the goal nor the outcome of this new law.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 1 points 11 minutes ago

It never applied to corpo slop factories in particular

[–] prex@aussie.zone 0 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Anecdotally untrue from my own kid, their school friends & my sisters kids.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 3 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

It won't. Hurting teenagers is in the entire point, especially certain vulnerable groups like LGBT teens.

[–] AntOnARant@programming.dev 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

What? How did you come to that conclusion? Most teens would be far better off without the constant barrage of content these websites push to us. Instead of having these laws, parents should be doing their jobs and protect their kids rather than letting their brains rot on the internet.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 1 points 10 minutes ago

That's a dishonest talking point

[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I’ve watched the debate closely and hurting teens or anyone else is definitely not the objective. Whether it succeeds or not is another question.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 1 points 11 minutes ago

Isolating LGBT terns us the admitted goal. That and Gaza related censorship

[–] Suffa@lemmy.wtf 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Yup, it’s going to cut off so many kids from their support networks.

Our government cares more about making baby steps to greater digital control and “protect the kids” packaging always sells well.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 1 points 12 minutes ago